The people who hate on and/or look down on Disney's 3D films are directing their hate toward the wrong things.
The two main reasons for that attitude are
The rise of 3D films indirectly caused 2D films to go out, and
Disney has been using the same art style for their 3D films for more than a decade now. Disney would reuse 2D art styles too, but I suppose it's more palpable with 2D than 3D
But here's the thing: none of those things are the fault of the movies themselves, the art style, or the people who work on those films. It's the fault of the CEOs and higher ups who run the company.
There is no form of animation that is objectively "superior" to another. Art is art. All forms of animation (2D, 3D, stop motion, photo-puppetry, whatever the animation style South Park uses is called idk, etc) have their pros and cons. Preferring one over the other is perfectly fine, as long as you don't try to act like it's the “superior” animation.
Don't direct your hate at the films themselves unless it's at an actual legitimate problem. Direct your hate at the shitty people who run the company with their terrible business decisions.
And this is all coming from someone who usually leans toward 2D art styles more and who's complained about Disney having the same art style in their modern movies. But the art style itself is not bad, quite the opposite. It's just the fact that Disney uses it for all of their films now that makes it feel corporate and tiring.
If there's one thing we should all agree on, it's that all forms of animation are valid. Except ai.
baratheonpilled
pixelskylines
areudirty
dededos
vaporwave
jacobvanloon
kianamaiart
