She’s so pathetic, I love him 🫶

#extradirty
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

Love Begins
No title available
Keni
AnasAbdin
Peter Solarz

★
occasionally subtle
🪼
No title available
Today's Document
Jules of Nature

pixel skylines
Xuebing Du
noise dept.
Three Goblin Art
styofa doing anything
tumblr dot com
h
seen from Honduras

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from China
seen from Chile

seen from Lithuania

seen from Türkiye

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Austria

seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from Indonesia
seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from United States
@ontologically-challenged
She’s so pathetic, I love him 🫶
We are love Espada here
In the 1960s and 70s, it was unthinkable that the US govt would use police force to open fire on protestors. Kent State was such a turning point in he anti-war movement. It quickly changed public opinion.
We all want to go out and fight for something, to try and make a difference, to resist. But today we aren’t even sure being gunned down by police during protests would sway people that things have gone wrong.
The major media journalists are paid for.
The courts are owned.
Every semi-independent govt agency has been brought under direct control: DoJ, FBI, FCC.
sad day today
When philosophers (by and large) identify humankind with ‘rational animals’ they don’t mean “people are reasonable” or “people are thoughtful” or even “people are open to changing their minds” they mean “people think, use tools, have language, complex desires, etc.”
People are rational not reasonable.
What's the first question that really pops into peoples' minds about Ea-Nasir? I'm trying to write this history down, but I'm struggling.
After looking through the evidence, both, but moreso the second.
Ea-Nasir's tablet is dated to 1750 BC, which is coincidentally aligns to the death of Hammurabi. For context, he lived at the end of the Isin-Larsa Period, a time in Babylonia's history where it was a collection of warring city-states. Ur and Larsa were the most powerful of these, since they were farthest south and controlled most of the trade coming up the Persian Gulf. (Isin, near where Hammurabi was from, was in the North and had lost power about 200 years before.)
Right after Hammurabi's death, all the city-states he'd conquered, including Larsa and Ur, decided that they didn't give two squats what the people in the North thought, and started a rebellion.
The tablets in Ea-Nasir's house have been translated. It's very difficult to find them, but the book is called Foreign Trade in the Old Babylonian Period, Leemans 1960, and he makes a series of interpretations that still align with our understanding of the culture today:
Ea-Nasir was hot-headed. 3 tablets note him talking rudely to messengers and traders.
Ea-Nasir sold copper to private merchants AND the temple, which was the government of Ur. The receipt we found is in such a large quantity we can assume the government was likely his primary buyer. The complaint tablets are from notably from private merchants.
Ea-Nasir was an alik-Tilmun; or 'one who travels to Dilmun'.
Where is Dilmun? Good question! Archaeologists spent the next 40 years figuring it out! At this point, they're fairly certain it's in present-day Qatar. The city was used as a midpoint port to bring in copper from Magan and Meluhha (current-day UAE/Oman and India respectively.)
The reason we know this, is because Oman is an old, old copper-producing region. It's an ophiolite (rock from the seafloor that's been uplifted to the surface) that contained a spreading center (think Mid-Atlantic ridge) which forms deposits of copper and other metals as sulfides from the black smoker vents (copper-iron sulfur, lead sulfur, zinc sulfur, etc.)
To produce copper, you have to remove the iron and the sulfur. To remove the iron, you add "flux", which essentially bonds iron to silica, because it likes silica more than copper does. And to remove the sulfur, you add oxygen, which burns off the sulfur as gaseous SO2.
The copper is heavier than the iron and silica, and sinks to the bottom of the furnace. The iron and silica, slag, flow out the side. The resulting ingot looks like the bowl below. And a lot of times, holes remained from gas getting trapped at the bottom.
They measured copper by weight though, so this wasn't too much of a problem. However, if there weren't enough flux, or the fire wasn't hot enough, iron would also get trapped in the copper ingot, making "black copper"; if a merchant wanted the 97% pure copper that could be made using this process, a lot of iron would definitely be considered 'bad copper'.
Switching back to the culture!
Around 1800 BC, the same time as this was going on, the culture of Oman underwent a noticeable decline. Many of their coastal mines stopped producing copper and people moved inland. They also stopped making bronze with tin. This is notable, because tin was scarce in the Bronze Age and insinuates they might've been left out of the trade route. At the very least, they had stopped being Mesopotamia's primary supplier and started doing their best to keep up with the times.
(At this point, I'll point a finger to Cyprus, which was firing up its smelters at the same time. Cyprus is very interesting, but it pertains less to Ea-Nasir, so I'll just wave enthusiastically at their oxhide ingot copper and tin trade domination.)
So we can't know if Ea-Nasir wasn't a chronic scammer, but I think all the evidence outlines a different story.
Ur, a powerful city-state rebelling against a conqueror within Ea-Nasir's lifetime. Ea-Nasir, selling large amounts of copper to the government, and smaller sales to private merchants who complained about being given scraps; a man who was still traveling to trade copper in a state that had lost their monopoly on the copper trade and was possibly producing some less-than-ideal quality.
He mostly sounds like a person with strong ties to his city and culture. Maybe not the best copper merchant, but certainly a passionate one.
References below the cut:
Research
and u don't know it's meaning
meet each other in any world
It’s good at that.
If you truly want to understand why Federer-Nadal's bond was so unique and separate from others, after the Laver Cup they interviewed all the team players on why they got emotional (or even cried) during Federer's retirement ceremony. Almost all of them, including Novak and Andy, mentioned that it reminded them of their mortality as tennis players, and in a way offered them a glimpse of what the end of their career would look like as well.
Rafa was the ONLY person, who explicitly denied it completely when asked whether any thought of his own retirement even crossed his mind.
He said he cried that day for Roger and Roger alone. For the immense respect he had for him, to mourn the end of their 20 year rivalry together, and also to say goodbye to the most important player in his life.
The tendency of the rate of profit is to ball.
I peaked with this.
We have a new EP, friends 🐝
(also available on various streaming services)
Good stuff
Do u ever think about how dogs, who have 2 colour receptors, see an apple as grayish yellow, while humans have 3 and see it as red, and mantis shrimp have 12, and see it another monstrous colour altogether?
How none of us are necessarily correct, and the apple itself, is not really any colour, it’s just a fruit minding its own goddamn business??
Fucking fascinating
We don’t know how ANYTHING TASTES, SOUNDS, LOOKS, FEELS, OR SMELLS
If you think about it just a bit too much like I did, you’ll reach the conclusion that nothing really tastes, sounds, looks, feels or smells. It’s just your brain’s interpretation of chemical composition, vibrations, the way things reflect light, more vibrations and chemical composition again
Reality can’t be proven to exist outside of our ability to perceive it through our senses but our senses can’t be trusted so basically nothing is real do what you want
Today on Tumblr Accidentally Recapitulates Wittgenstein’s Theory of Experiential Epistomology
Tfw you shitpost so hard you accidentally write a beautiful summary of the defining breakthrough of 20th century philosophy.
when you shitpost so hard you become a presocratic
Long before Wittgenstein, John Locke helped himself to the distinction between primary and secondary qualities in sense experience as well.
Do you ever interact with someone and you realize “this person has never had to consider or think about what their place in the world is, and why they believe certain things or act certain ways, this person has never considered society at length” and it’s just terrifying
“If you desire to be good, begin by believing that you are wicked.” – Epictetus, Fragments
“The unexamined life is not worth living.” – Socrates, in Plato’s Apology