Brian McFadden: Is Google Cooked? (via Daily Kos)
dirt enthusiast
Stranger Things
Three Goblin Art
Claire Keane
Not today Justin
RMH
hello vonnie
Sade Olutola
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open

titsay
Mike Driver

Product Placement

祝日 / Permanent Vacation

oozey mess
h
occasionally subtle

No title available

izzy's playlists!

Andulka
wallacepolsom
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Singapore

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from China

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia
seen from France

seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from France

seen from Mexico

seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from Canada
@paradoxides
Brian McFadden: Is Google Cooked? (via Daily Kos)
gay sex walkthrough 100% all secrets & bonus levels no commentary
am i allowed to say kill all trillionaires or is that too specific of a threat
absolute gold on Reddit today
me legit
"there is no way you're not using chatgpt for at least a few things here and there no matter your stance on it" what the FUCK are you talking about
Life in Hell (1977-2012) Matt Groening
Facebook is NOT a game
“Because the truth is, tech doesn’t have an image problem. It doesn’t have a message problem. It has an intention problem. What’s wrong with the axe murderer who broke into my house is not that he hasn’t successfully persuaded me to buy into his narrative. What’s wrong is that he’s trying to kill me with an axe. Similarly, when you launch a product that’s designed to put millions of people out of work, block access to sources of verifiable truth, replace human creativity with slop, and lower the barriers to every sort of atrocity, the problem isn’t that you haven’t told the public a good story about those things. The problem is that you are trying to do them.”
— The 40 Most Rage-Inducing Problems in Tech
J. Drew Lanham, Sparrow Envy: Field Guide to Birds and Lesser Beasts (2021)
All of this converges on the question of VISIBILITY. Visibility was a construct that the gay and lesbian movement invented to explain and excuse the cruelty we were experiencing. We denied that it was intentional. Instead we invented the idea that it was an inadvertent consequence of heterosexuals having a lack of information about what we are really like. If they would discover how we truly are, they would not want to hurt us. And since they were doing everything imaginable—using every social institution to make it impossible for us to be truly seen—we would have to subject ourselves to extreme violation in order to force a cathartic experience for them that would make them better. This process required shock troops of certain stupendously courageous gay and lesbian individuals to “come out” and be fully subjected to the force of punishment, thereby creating the inevitable social change that we felt would accompany recognition. Some of us forced them to see us, expecting that once they would see us, they would love us, and then realize that our disenfranchisement was morally wrong, and they would then join with us in correcting these structures of exclusion, both emotional and social. The plan was that the vanguard homosexuals, willing to take the punishment, would then make things easier for other, less courageous ones looking on from the wings waiting for this battle to achieve a more equitable field. These others could then enter the process with progressively fewer degrees of loss, but filled with recognition for their brave predecessors, and what we had done for them. Looking back at the way we created the issue of “visibility” as a strategy for change is a painful confrontation with the realization that it was an engagement with magical thinking. We believed that straight people hate and hurt us because they don’t know us. If we could have visibility, they would realize that we are fine and would accept us. This theory has been disproven by history. Now we have enormous visibility and the hatred and overt campaigns against us ranging from commodification to constitutional amendments to dehumanizingly false representations in popular culture have intensified and become more deliberate. Clearly ignorance was not the determining factor in what caused homophobia. There is much more volition on the part of homophobes than we ever imagined.
Ties That Bind: Familial Homophobia and Its Consequences, Sarah Schulman. 2009.
Oh, my heart hurts.
Pokemon Crystal Gameboy Color 2000
At the moment you make a critique of patriarchy suddenly all men are black brown disabled mentally ill poor immigrant queer refugee polyamorous diabetic toothless from a developing country and all women are white rich warlord 1stworlders