there’s evil in me

screaming into the void will make me feel better i think

[permahurt]

𝐏𝐞𝐩𝐩𝐞𝐫 𝘩𝘦 / 𝘮𝘦𝘰𝘸 / 𝘱𝘶𝘳𝘳 𝘤𝘩𝘳𝘰𝘯𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘦𝘯 θη

𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚒𝚜 𝚊 𝐯𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐛𝐥𝐨𝐠. 𝚒 𝚠𝚒𝚕𝚕 𝚛𝚎𝚋𝚕𝚘𝚐 𝚗𝚘𝚗-𝚟𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚜, 𝚝𝚑𝚘𝚞𝚐𝚑. 𝚒 𝚠𝚒𝚕𝚕 𝚋𝚎 𝚞𝚗𝚊𝚙𝚘𝚕𝚘𝚐𝚎𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚢 𝚖𝚢𝚜𝚎𝚕𝚏. 𝚒𝚏 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚖𝚊𝚔𝚎𝚜 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚞𝚗𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚎, 𝚕𝚎𝚊𝚟𝚎.

𝐜𝐢𝐬𝐈𝐃𝐬 𝚌𝚒𝚜𝚋𝚙𝚍, 𝚌𝚒𝚜𝚂𝙰𝙳, 𝚌𝚒𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚛𝚖𝚎𝚍 [𝚐𝚛𝚘𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚍, 𝙲𝚂𝙰, 𝙲𝙾𝙰𝚂𝙰, 𝚂𝙰], 𝚌𝚒𝚜𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚗𝚊𝚍𝚍𝚒𝚌𝚝, 𝚌𝚒𝚜𝚍𝚛𝚞𝚐𝚊𝚍𝚍𝚒𝚌𝚝, 𝚌𝚒𝚜🧸, 𝚌𝚒𝚜🍯, 𝚌𝚒𝚜𝚖𝚊𝚜𝚘𝚌𝚑𝚒𝚜𝚝, 𝚌𝚒𝚜𝚊𝚞𝚝𝚘𝚍𝚘𝚙𝚎𝚙𝚑𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚊, 𝚌𝚒𝚜𝚊𝚞𝚝𝚘𝚊𝚙𝚝𝚘𝚙𝚑𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚊 𝐭𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐬𝐈𝐃𝐬 𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚜𝚜𝚙𝚎𝚌𝚒𝚎𝚜 [𝚌𝚊𝚝 / 𝚖𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚛], 𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚜𝚐𝚎𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚛 [𝚏𝚝𝚖], 𝚝𝚛𝚊𝚗𝚜𝚙𝚜𝚢𝚌𝚑𝚘𝚝𝚒𝚌

[permahurt]

Thank god there’s someone logical around.

I know people like to go “but radqueer was meant for pro-c!!” or whatever the fuck, but GOD i’m so tired of the abuse being normalized here.

the amount of pro-c zoos ive seen recently is insane too.. tell me you don’t actually understand animal psychology without telling me.

Sorry for the small rant here, i’m just tired of it and you seemed like someone who understood.

i'm looking back at the "original radqueer" coining post and? it says nothing about radqueer being inherently pro-contact?

the creator was pro-contact, not the term itself. people saying it was "meant for pro-cs" are wrong.

the "new radqueer" coining post doesn't have a contact stance tied to it, but it clearly says that only non-offending / non-active pro-contacts are welcome. there are a disturbing amount of offending pro-cs in this community. thank god an offending pro-c coined "post-radqueer" for them so they don't feel left out. [/sarcasm]

rambling aside, i feel you, anon. they don't know shit about animal psychology or adolescent trauma, but they sure do like to act like they do.

i'm sick of seeing predators being defended and welcomed in this community. it wasn't like this before. i'm so hopeful that we can turn this around. and then my dreams are crushed by seeing a chrono adult being celebrated for openly dating and sexting a chrono kid [and seeing a bunch of other people feel jealous that they aren't being groomed by some rando pro-contact-aligned "contact stance abolitionist" furry online. holy fucking shit, i'm so sick of this.

at least i'm not alone. thank you. there are only so much of us real radqueers left. i'm not surprised people jumped ship after this... shift happened.

[permahurt]

...? What's a zoo masochist

𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚎'𝚜 𝚑𝚘𝚠 𝚒 𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚘𝚗𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚢 𝚍𝚎𝚏𝚒𝚗𝚎 𝚒𝚝: 𝚜𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚘𝚗𝚎 𝚠𝚑𝚘 𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚟𝚎𝚜 𝚙𝚕𝚎𝚊𝚜𝚞𝚛𝚎 𝚏𝚛𝚘𝚖 𝚋𝚎𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚑𝚊𝚛𝚖𝚎𝚍 𝚋𝚢 𝚊𝚗 𝚊𝚗𝚒𝚖𝚊𝚕.

𝚒 𝚛𝚎𝚐𝚞𝚕𝚊𝚛𝚕𝚢 𝚏𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚜𝚒𝚣𝚎 𝚊𝚋𝚘𝚞𝚝 𝚋𝚎𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚖𝚊𝚞𝚕𝚎𝚍 [𝚊𝚕𝚖𝚘𝚜𝚝 𝚝𝚘 𝚍𝚎𝚊𝚝𝚑] 𝚋𝚢 𝚍𝚘𝚐𝚜, 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚒 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚢 𝚎𝚗𝚓𝚘𝚢 𝚐𝚎𝚝𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚋𝚒𝚝𝚝𝚎𝚗 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚜𝚌𝚛𝚊𝚝𝚌𝚑𝚎𝚍 𝚋𝚢 𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚌𝚞𝚛𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚝 𝚙𝚎𝚝𝚜. 𝚒'𝚖 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚜𝚞𝚛𝚎 𝚒𝚏 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚒𝚜 𝚜𝚎𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚊𝚝𝚎 𝚏𝚛𝚘𝚖 𝚣𝚘𝚘𝚖𝚊𝚜𝚘𝚌𝚑𝚒𝚜𝚖 𝚘𝚛 𝚗𝚘𝚝, 𝚋𝚞𝚝 𝚒 𝚊𝚕𝚜𝚘 𝚐𝚎𝚝 𝚘𝚏𝚏 𝚘𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚊 𝚘𝚏 𝚋𝚎𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚛𝚊𝚙𝚎𝚍 𝚋𝚢 𝚊𝚗𝚒𝚖𝚊𝚕𝚜.

[permahurt]

could you talk more about Dave / postrq coiner being caught committing those abuses? /gen

I've never heard of this and when I joined the community at 14 I was Semi-Friends with him.

of course haven't spoken in years.

𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚎'𝚜 𝚑𝚘𝚠 𝚒 𝚏𝚘𝚞𝚗𝚍 𝚘𝚞𝚝 𝚊𝚋𝚘𝚞𝚝 𝚒𝚝. 𝚑𝚎𝚎𝚍 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚠𝚊𝚛𝚗𝚒𝚗𝚐𝚜.

𝚒'𝚖 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚜𝚞𝚛𝚙𝚛𝚒𝚜𝚎𝚍 𝚜𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚘𝚗𝚎 𝚠𝚑𝚘'𝚜 "𝚝𝚘𝚘 𝚙𝚛𝚘-𝚌 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚛𝚊𝚍𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚎𝚛𝚜" 𝚠𝚘𝚞𝚕𝚍 𝚍𝚘 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚜𝚑𝚒𝚝. 𝚒 𝚑𝚘𝚙𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚟𝚒𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚖𝚜 𝚊𝚛𝚎 𝚍𝚘𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚠𝚎𝚕𝚕. 𝚒 𝚑𝚘𝚙𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚢'𝚛𝚎 𝚏𝚊𝚛 𝚊𝚠𝚊𝚢 𝚏𝚛𝚘𝚖 𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚎.

Post by @critterkiddo · 4 images

💬 3  🔁 12  ❤️ 29 · ⚠️ CW: mentions of CSA, grooming, CSEM ⚠️ · A moderator of Oddballs, Dave @str1derpunk, @davetastic, @illpunk or @/turnte

[permahurt]

𝚒 𝚔𝚎𝚎𝚙 𝚐𝚎𝚝𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚟𝚒𝚍𝚎𝚘𝚜 𝚘𝚏 𝚊 𝚌𝚞𝚝𝚎 𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚝𝚕𝚎 𝚋𝚘𝚢 𝚛𝚎𝚝𝚛𝚒𝚎𝚟𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚜 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚖𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛 𝚘𝚗 𝚖𝚢 𝚏𝚎𝚎𝚍… 𝙼𝙰𝙿 𝚠…..

[permahurt]

𝚒 𝚌𝚊𝚗’𝚝 𝚜𝚝𝚘𝚙 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚗𝚔𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚊𝚋𝚘𝚞𝚝 𝚑𝚘𝚠 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚒𝚗𝚎𝚛 𝚘𝚏 𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚝-𝚛𝚊𝚍𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚎𝚛 𝚐𝚛𝚘𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚍 𝚝𝚑𝚛𝚎𝚎 𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚘𝚛𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚠𝚊𝚜 𝚌𝚊𝚞𝚐𝚑𝚝 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝙲𝚂𝙰𝙼.

𝚒 𝚍𝚘𝚗’𝚝 𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚠𝚑𝚢 𝚠𝚎 𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚗 𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚒𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚜𝚎 𝚙𝚎𝚘𝚙𝚕𝚎.

[machine-babydoll-reborn]

This is a post I’ve wanted to make breaking down something I saw. I don’t remember the exact wording of the post given that I blocked the poster. But the general idea of it was “contact stances are meaningless because anyone can be a bad person”.

Which, this is true. There are plenty of examples of people presenting themselves as “anti-contact paraphiles” who were later caught grooming children or consuming CSEM. Heck, there are plenty of cases of people presenting themselves as “anti-para” caught doing that. I don’t remember the blog’s username, but I’m pretty sure there’s a proship blog dedicated to archiving examples of antishippers who accused proshippers of being predators for simply writing dark fiction, but were later caught being predators themselves. Part of grooming is making yourself appear trustworthy, approachable, and safe at first.

This is why, despite what contact stance someone puts in their bio, it’s still important to exercise critical thinking and practice internet safety. On the internet, anything someone says could be a lie. You might think you know me because I post about my life. But any of my posts could be a lie. I could be anyone. I could be a serial killer. I’m not, but isn’t that what a serial killer would say? The point is, me posting a bunch about abuse being wrong doesn’t suddenly make it okay to drop your real-life address in my askbox and say that you want to try to meet up.

But just because someone claiming to be anti-abuse could be lying doesn’t mean we should accept people who openly profess being for abuse. Regardless what fancy terminology they dress it up in. I say this as someone who could have used this advice a while back (bad situation with an ex-friend, long story): when someone tries to tell you that they are a bad person, you should go ahead and believe them.

[permahurt]

I love your art style so much, it’s so comforting!!

It looks like it would have the texture of poprocks or nerds/pos -🔪🐾

𝚞𝚠𝚊, 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚗𝚔 𝚢𝚘𝚞! 𝚖𝚊𝚔𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚊𝚛𝚝 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚜 𝚖𝚎, 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚒'𝚖 𝚑𝚊𝚙𝚙𝚢 𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚜 𝚌𝚊𝚗 𝚐𝚎𝚝 𝚜𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚘𝚞𝚝 𝚘𝚏 𝚒𝚝.

𝚖𝚢 𝚜𝚝𝚢𝚕𝚎 𝚑𝚊𝚜 𝚗𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚛 𝚋𝚎𝚎𝚗 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚎𝚍 𝚝𝚘 𝚌𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚢 𝚋𝚎𝚏𝚘𝚛𝚎. 𝚒'𝚖 𝚏𝚕𝚊𝚝𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚎𝚍, 𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚕𝚕𝚢.

[permahurt]

𝚍𝚘𝚡𝚡𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚖𝚢𝚜𝚎𝚕𝚏…. 𝚒'𝚖 𝚜𝚘𝚛𝚛𝚢. [/𝚜𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚢]

𝚒𝚝'𝚜 𝚖𝚎… 𝚋𝚞𝚝 𝚒 𝚠𝚒𝚜𝚑 𝚒𝚝 𝚠𝚊𝚜𝚗'𝚝…

[averycutebat]

ped bear as a wifu

[permahurt]

𝚒 𝚗𝚎𝚎𝚍 𝚝𝚘 𝚛𝚎𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚍 𝚖𝚢𝚜𝚎𝚕𝚏 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚒 𝚌𝚊𝚗'𝚝 𝚑𝚎𝚕𝚙 𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚢𝚘𝚗𝚎.

𝚒𝚝 𝚠𝚒𝚕𝚕 𝚋𝚎 𝚊 𝚕𝚎𝚊𝚛𝚗𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚎𝚡𝚙𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚖, 𝚓𝚞𝚜𝚝 𝚕𝚒𝚔𝚎 𝚒𝚝 𝚠𝚊𝚜 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚖𝚎.

[permahurt]

for the sake of clarification, I wanted to say that by "Yeah! I wanna groom kids!" I wasnt necessarily talking about sexual fantasies, I was referring to people who actively and openly search for AAMs, who respond to vulnerable minors who are looking for partners

𝚘𝚑 𝚘𝚔𝚊𝚢, 𝚜𝚘𝚛𝚛𝚢 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚖𝚒𝚜𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚢𝚘𝚞. 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚋𝚎𝚝𝚠𝚎𝚎𝚗 𝚠𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚘𝚗𝚎 𝚜𝚊𝚢𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚍𝚘𝚎𝚜 𝚒𝚜 𝚟𝚎𝚛𝚢 𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚝, 𝚜𝚘 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚗𝚔 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚌𝚕𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚏𝚢𝚒𝚗𝚐.

[permahurt]

its also crazy to me that in the radqueer community, as long as you sprinkle enough queer language on it, you're allowed to be as abusive as you want.

The fact that people will jump up and down and go "Yeah! I'm a cisgroomer!" or "Yeah! I want to groom kids!" and even some anti-cs wont bat an eye

i don't think someone saying what they want necessarily reflects what they'll do, which is why some anti-cs won't jump on someone saying that they want to do something that would be unethical to act out. i think everyone should be able to express fantasies without the fear of being seen as a danger. attraction and fantasies do not equal action. i support transgroomers, transabusers, and everyone under the transharmful umbrella. by using the trans- prefix, there's reassurance that you're not actually a groomer / abusive.

i do have a more nuanced take on cisharmfuls (ignoring the fact "cisharmful" as a label was coined by a bad-faith, self-proclaimed "pro-abuse" shithead): ex-abusers and ex-offenders take solace in the label, and as one myself, i understand why to an extent... but i agree that we shouldn't accept people parading around the fact that they're--for a lack of better word--"active" cisharmfuls. god, what am i saying, they're just abusers that hide in our community by perverting our good-faith labels. we should not be okay with people willingly advocating for and celebrating causing non-consensual harm*. this is also why i fucking hate xenosatanists and people aligned with them even breathing in the direction of our community. they don't belong in our spaces, and they never will.

*i hate that i have to elaborate on what non-consensual harm means because who can consent is a highly debated topic for some fucking reason: anyone chrono under 16 years old cannot consent to a sexual relationship with chrono adults, and animals (no, i'm obviously not talking about therians / headmates / bodily humans who identify as animals) cannot give consent. anyone chrono 18+ who knowingly go out of their way to sexually engage with chrono under 16 year olds, and anyone who willingly has sexual contact with animals are abusers, and they have no place in the radqueer community.

[permahurt]

One of the most subtly dangerous intracommunity behaviors pro-c radqueers exhibit is the obfuscation of contact labels. Even beyond the gaggle of radqueers who're trying to claim that "pro contact is basically the same as anti contact UwU" before turning around and advocating for animal marriage, you have stuff like the label "pro-consent" or "complex consent" which allow for extreme plausible deniability. Either label can mean anything from "I think therians/transage teens are able to consent to sex" to "children are basically just adults UwU. They can totally understand the ramifications of consent! Just dont look at anystudy about just PLEASE dont check any study about childhood sexual abuse please dont-"

𝚒 𝚑𝚊𝚟𝚎 𝚗𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚘 𝚊𝚍𝚍. 𝚢𝚘𝚞'𝚛𝚎 𝚛𝚒𝚐𝚑𝚝, 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚒𝚝'𝚜 𝚒𝚗𝚏𝚞𝚛𝚒𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚜 𝚒𝚜 𝚊 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚋𝚕𝚎𝚖 𝚏𝚘𝚛 𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚖𝚞𝚗𝚒𝚝𝚢 𝚊𝚝 𝚊𝚕𝚕.

[permahurt]

the day people learn what pro-contact actually means is the day i know peace.

no, it has nothing to do with your opinion on contact for ALL paraphilias. that's misinformation.

here it is from mapresources.info, a site i've seen many MAPs of different contact stances use, so you know it's not biased:

can we finally be on the same page now? contact discourse isn't as complex as it's made out to be.

[permahurt]

instead of vagueposting about me . maybe reach out if u have a genuine fucking issue

𝚜𝚘𝚖𝚎𝚘𝚗𝚎 𝚊𝚕𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚍𝚢 𝚊𝚙𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚊𝚌𝚑𝚎𝚍 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚊𝚋𝚘𝚞𝚝 𝚠𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚍𝚒𝚍 𝚙𝚞𝚋𝚕𝚒𝚌𝚕𝚢.

𝚢𝚘𝚞'𝚛𝚎 𝚊𝚙𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚎𝚗𝚝𝚕𝚢 𝚞𝚗𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚎 𝚝𝚘 𝚜𝚎𝚎 𝚑𝚘𝚠 𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚝𝚛𝚒𝚋𝚞𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚜𝚎𝚡𝚞𝚊𝚕 𝚊𝚋𝚞𝚜𝚎 𝚖𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚊𝚕 𝚒𝚜 𝚠𝚛𝚘𝚗𝚐 𝚍𝚞𝚎 𝚝𝚘 𝚢𝚘𝚞𝚛 "𝚕𝚊𝚌𝚔 𝚘𝚏 𝚎𝚖𝚙𝚊𝚝𝚑𝚢 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚊𝚕𝚜". 𝚝𝚊𝚔𝚎 𝚜𝚘𝚖𝚎 𝚏𝚞𝚌𝚔𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚊𝚌𝚌𝚘𝚞𝚗𝚝𝚊𝚋𝚒𝚕𝚒𝚝𝚢. 𝚒𝚏 𝚢𝚘𝚞'𝚛𝚎 𝚞𝚗𝚠𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚘 𝚌𝚑𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚎, 𝚝𝚛𝚢𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚘 𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚒𝚜 𝚊 𝚠𝚊𝚜𝚝𝚎 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚒𝚖𝚎.

𝚙𝚎𝚘𝚙𝚕𝚎 𝚕𝚒𝚔𝚎 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚐𝚒𝚟𝚎 𝚞𝚜 𝚊 𝚋𝚊𝚍 𝚗𝚊𝚖𝚎, 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚖𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚊𝚕 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚞𝚎𝚜 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚌𝚢𝚌𝚕𝚎 𝚘𝚏 𝚊𝚋𝚞𝚜𝚎. 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚌𝚕𝚊𝚒𝚖 𝚝𝚘 𝚋𝚎 𝚊𝚗𝚝𝚒-𝚊𝚋𝚞𝚜𝚎 𝚠𝚑𝚒𝚕𝚎 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚊𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚎𝚕𝚢 𝚙𝚊𝚛𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚒𝚙𝚊𝚝𝚎 𝚒𝚗 𝚜𝚑𝚊𝚛𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚊𝚋𝚞𝚜𝚎 𝚖𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚊𝚕 𝚊𝚛𝚘𝚞𝚗𝚍. 𝚒'𝚖 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚜𝚞𝚛𝚎 𝚒𝚏 𝚢𝚘𝚞'𝚟𝚎 𝚗𝚘𝚝𝚒𝚌𝚎𝚍, 𝚋𝚞𝚝 𝚠𝚎 𝚍𝚘𝚗'𝚝 𝚕𝚒𝚔𝚎 𝚊𝚋𝚞𝚜𝚎𝚛𝚜. 𝚙𝚎𝚘𝚙𝚕𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚗𝚔 𝚠𝚎'𝚛𝚎 𝚕𝚒𝚔𝚎 𝚢𝚘𝚞, 𝚋𝚞𝚝 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚜𝚑𝚘𝚞𝚕𝚍𝚗'𝚝 𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚗 𝚋𝚎 𝚒𝚗 𝚘𝚞𝚛 𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚖𝚞𝚗𝚒𝚝𝚢.

𝚢𝚘𝚞'𝚛𝚎 𝚌𝚊𝚙𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚎 𝚘𝚏 𝚌𝚑𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚎, 𝚓𝚞𝚜𝚝 𝚕𝚒𝚔𝚎 𝚊𝚗𝚢𝚘𝚗𝚎 𝚒𝚜. 𝚊𝚍𝚖𝚒𝚝 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚍𝚒𝚍 𝚠𝚛𝚘𝚗𝚐 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚑𝚘𝚕𝚍 𝚢𝚘𝚞𝚛𝚜𝚎𝚕𝚏 𝚝𝚘 𝚗𝚘𝚝 𝚍𝚘𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚒𝚝 𝚊𝚐𝚊𝚒𝚗. 𝙱𝙴 𝚋𝚎𝚝𝚝𝚎𝚛.

𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚜𝚑𝚘𝚞𝚕𝚍 𝚊𝚕𝚜𝚘 𝚎𝚡𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚘𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛𝚜 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚌𝚕𝚊𝚒𝚖 𝚙𝚘𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚍 𝚜𝚎𝚡𝚞𝚊𝚕 𝚊𝚋𝚞𝚜𝚎 𝚖𝚊𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚊𝚕 𝚊𝚜 𝚠𝚎𝚕𝚕. 𝚓𝚞𝚜𝚝 𝚋𝚎𝚌𝚊𝚞𝚜𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚢'𝚛𝚎 𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚘𝚛𝚜 𝚍𝚘𝚎𝚜𝚗'𝚝 𝚖𝚎𝚊𝚗 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚢 𝚜𝚑𝚘𝚞𝚕𝚍 𝚋𝚎 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚝𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚎𝚍. 𝚊𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚜 𝚕𝚒𝚔𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚝 𝚍𝚎𝚜𝚎𝚛𝚟𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚜𝚎𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚗𝚌𝚎𝚜. 𝚍𝚘𝚗'𝚝 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚝𝚎𝚌𝚝 𝚙𝚛𝚎𝚍𝚊𝚝𝚘𝚛𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚊𝚋𝚞𝚜𝚎 𝚎𝚗𝚊𝚋𝚕𝚎𝚛𝚜. 𝚒𝚏 𝚢𝚘𝚞 𝚍𝚘, 𝚍𝚘𝚗'𝚝 𝚋𝚎 𝚜𝚞𝚛𝚙𝚛𝚒𝚜𝚎𝚍 𝚠𝚑𝚎𝚗 𝚠𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚒𝚗𝚔 𝚢𝚘𝚞'𝚛𝚎 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚖.

[permahurt]

You're cool

𝚝𝚑𝚊𝚗𝚔 𝚢𝚘𝚞. 𝚕𝚎𝚝'𝚜 𝚋𝚎 𝚌𝚘𝚘𝚕 𝚝𝚘𝚐𝚎𝚝𝚑𝚎𝚛, 𝚊𝚗𝚘𝚗. 𝚒 𝚗𝚎𝚎𝚍 𝚖𝚘𝚛𝚎 𝚏𝚎𝚕𝚕𝚘𝚠 𝚌𝚘𝚘𝚕𝚜 𝚒𝚗 𝚖𝚢 𝚕𝚒𝚏𝚎.