using the traffic light system during a kink scene but shaking my head the entire time so the audience knows i dont support car-dependant infrastructure and its influence on the common vocabulary
Cookie Run:Kingdom Official!
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Game of Thrones Daily

ellievsbear
The Bright Sessions
NASA
Mike Driver
No title available
RMH
tumblr dot com
todays bird
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
KIROKAZE
Show & Tell

if i look back, i am lost
Claire Keane

Origami Around

izzy's playlists!

Discoholic 🪩
noise dept.
seen from Singapore
seen from United States

seen from Bangladesh
seen from Mexico

seen from Australia
seen from Germany
seen from China

seen from Russia

seen from Canada
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Brazil

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@plsstopyelling
using the traffic light system during a kink scene but shaking my head the entire time so the audience knows i dont support car-dependant infrastructure and its influence on the common vocabulary
EMMERDALE 20.08.2025
THE OLD GUARD character posters glow-up
ONE ——————————> TWO
I love logging into tumblr in the year of 2025 and see Merlin trending
Hope for the democratic party?
Ah a more practical use for this technology
she's waiting patiently for her witchy girlfriend.
whale store xoxo | milklove new series for 2025
" it's our dream "
like i'm sorry but we as a fandom have to stay firm on our anti-AI values. we cannot suddenly start giving AI a pass when it's something we "want to see" like destiel kisses. it's not suddenly fine. we're not going to start using AI to make fanfic scenes come to life or audio AI to make characters "say" stuff we want to hear. you have GOT to be firm on your anti-AI stance. if you start making exceptions then suddenly anything will fly. fandom is for real art and creations made by real people. no AI fanfics. no AI art. no AI rendered "bonus" scenes. no AI audio. none of it has a place here.
Century of Love: A gentle Trojan Horse* in Thai media.
To be honest, I've dated both women and men. But actually, I did not just date them. Well… I've had experience. Enough. I don't want to hear it. How could you say something so morally inappropriate? It's the truth. It's us people who came up with these moral values. If people change, they should change too. But I can't accept it. You don't have to. Because, even if you don't accept it, it won't change the fact that, in this world, there are men who like men, and women who like women, not… Can we change the topic?
*Author's Note: the concept of Trojan Horse, defined as "any trick or stratagem that causes a target to invite a foe into a securely protected bastion or place", has negative connotations. That said, in this essay I am not in any way, shape or form using the literal meaning of the expression, but playing with the idea of subtly hiding the final purpose of an action to avoid being rejected upfront, in order to make people understand different perspectives or ideas about a controversial subject, this case being that love is a universal feeling, neither bound to specific physical attributes nor meant only for reproductive purposes.
A bit of a backstory to understand where we're coming from and where we're trying to get to: One31, the company producing COL, is one of the two digital TV channels owned by GMM Grammy, which is the largest media conglomerate entertainment company in Thailand. It is a relatively new channel (2011), but it has become pretty popular in Thailand in a very short period of time thanks to its use of traditional TV and online media, being able to reach a broad audience. It offers a wide range of entertainment programmes, from Thai dramas to variety shows.
Thai dramas (lakorn) are a classical genre of Thai TV. This type of story is the equivalent of a 'soap opera' or 'telenovela'. This genre has a quite fixed structure, the story following a main character who is faced with internal and external obstacles that they have to overcome to be able to live happily ever after. Quite often, the plot is driven by a love story. A lakorn is created to be consumed by a general audience, and the best shows are broadcast in TV prime time, after the news, at 20:30. In order for a lakorn to be successful, TV channels cast the most popular actors and many times incorporate Thai history and traditions into the story to appeal to all ages.
In 2022, One31 released Khun Chai (To Sir, with love), on Mondays and Tuesdays. This show was written by the same team as Century of Love (COL). It is a period lakorn, whose main character is a gay man in Siam in the 1930s. The storyline followed Tian, the heir of a rich Chinese family living in Siam, falling in love with a poor man, and the struggles he faces because he is forced to hide his real feelings by his family because of traditions. The main character was portrayed by a very famous lakorn actor (Film Thanapat), and it attracted the attention of a wide audience, including the older generations of viewers (over 40).
The show has a happy ending where the main character ends up with his loved one and is accepted by his family, and he hopes for a better future for all, no matter who you fall in love with. It positively resonated with its target audience, mostly older women who have been raised in a traditional environment with certain moral values.
The success of the show created a curious outcome: the fanclub for the actors is mainly composed by older women (over 40), contrary to the general BL shows fans, who are mostly younger women (under 30).
Khun Chai isn't a BL. It has all the features of a traditional lakorn. And it was perceived like that by the audience. That slightly changed the game, because it showed how older people raised with traditional values and customs could accept a 'modern' view of love without feeling attacked in their beliefs.
After Khun Chai, in 2023 the same team wrote and filmed Laws of Attraction (LOA), with the same actors but in a modern setting. It was also well-received by the audience.
Soon after LOA finished, the writing team started creating COL. They used the same concept (a male/male love story), but this time they took some risks: they decided to cast new young actors, barely known by the older generations but well-known by the youngest ones, which made the show resemble more a BL than a lakorn. They also placed the show in the prime time slot. And they even made a deal with an international streaming platform (Netflix) to broadcast the show in other parts of Asia. They created a setup for the show to be successful.
And here is where the Trojan horse metaphor comes in.
Century of Love begins as a typical lakorn. Our story starts with San, a poor man of Chinese descent who falls in love with Wad, a rich girl, and whose love story is cut short because the girl's father wants her to marry a rich suitor. When San and Wad try to escape, Wad is killed by her spiteful suitor when she tries to protect San. In despair, San accepts to make a pact with a Goddess to live 100 years more in order to find Wad's reincarnation and be able to love and protect her.
There we have all the elements of the genre to interest the audience: the tragic hero facing obstacles, the cultural and moral values, the star-crossed lovers.
However, once the audience is engaged, comes the plot twist: a 100 years later, San seems to find the person he is looking for... in Vee, a young man.
The writers have smartly shaped the characters to resonate with a general audience: San is a 124 year old man and, although he hasn't aged due to the curse, he behaves and thinks as an old person. His personal values and beliefs are very traditional and set in stone. He is shown to be religious, strict and follows a high moral compass.
As he says to Vee, "he cannot accept" certain new ideas because they are "morally innappropriate".
Uncomfortable? Why would I be uncomfortable? You are a man. And you had to marry me, even though it's a just a fake wedding to negate bad luck. You must feel uncomfortable. Oh, P'San. This is it? I don't mind at all. Why not? If people know you married a man, they would speak ill of you.
Even so, San is not a villain, he is the hero of the story. He is a relatable character and the audience is led to feel compelled by his tragic fate. And a very important point to understand how to reach the older generations: the script never mocks his beliefs or values, it shows that thanks to those, San is also compassionate, kind and fiercely protective of those who he loves.
But, for the story to advance, the script has to make the audience understand how and why San changes some of his beliefs (the moral inappropriateness of loving another man). What's the best way to do that? Using comedy.
I'm screwed!
And a very basic type of comedy: slapstick and innuendos.
Thus, the older audience can feel more comfortable when watching what, in the end, is a 'non-traditional' love story.
This premise applies to Vee's character as well. Vee is a young man with a difficult past, and the caretaker of his dying Grandma. He is a devoted grandchild and, despite his misfortunes, deals with his problems with a smile.
Vee touches the audience's heart because we feel what San feels: the protective instinct to shield him from harm and give him a better life.
Therefore, if the audience is able to warm up to both main leads separately, would they be against them endind up together? It wouldn't seem so.
In addition, the show also uses the traditional customs and culture in its favour. The Goddess approves and encourages the relationship between San and Vee by all means. And we all know that religion has a very fixed set of rules and principles. If the Goddess accepts this type of love, why would her believers do quite the opposite?
In summary, COL is a lakorn in its content and format and therefore reaches a very wide and varied audience. And it also serves as this gentle Trojan horse I alluded at the beginning because it subtly challenges part of its audience to ponder about what love means and entails: can we deny love to people we don't agree or don't share our beliefs with?.
If love changes people, can people change for love?
"Love is simply just love, and has nothing to do with anything else."
Worawit Khuttiyayothin (director of COL)
Saturday marks one year since Minnesota became a refuge state for transgender people. The state’s status has reached far beyond its borders,
So happy this man and his husband are safe now but good God he experienced some horrific shit.
Something that is really striking to me is that they had to get divorced for Erik to persue gender affirming care (while it was still legal) and for all intents and purposes continued to live as husbands together, including fleeing the country together, but because they do not have the legal status they were coerced to give up, their cases are being treated separately.
This highlights the extreme vulnerability of LGBTQ asylum seekers and in particular I think it highlights the vulnerability of bisexual asylum seekers (though I do not know if that is how Ivan would define himself). Bisexual asylum seekers are held to higher standards than gay asylum seeker and are more likely to have their claim denied, particularly if they've had meaningful opposite sex relationships. I don't think there is much data about the outcomes of partners of trans people in asylum seeking (and the relationships of trans men partnered with cis men during their transition is an understudied topic to begin with). Hopefully, Ivan will be able to claim refugee status, join Erik in Minnesota, and they will be able to remarry.
This fundraiser is for two members of the LGBTQ community, Erik and Iva… Joe Briol needs your support for Erik and Ivan, a Russian LGBTQ cou
It's a bit buried in the article, but the Bedas also have a GoFundMe to help cover living and legal expenses while they work to be reunited
As of April 27, they are just $636 shy of their $15,000 goal
Erik and Ivan Beda were forced by the Russian government to divorce when Erik transitioned in 2023. It led to their separation at the border
They have been reunited & are finally legally married again :)
Look at the happiness and joy and love!
Time for the memes
I’m sorry, but aren’t we collectively tired of all our clothes being made of polyester?
"microfiber. viscose. rayon blend. ripstop. fleece. jersey knit. pet. vegan leather. polyurethane vinyl. lycra. vegan shearling. acrylic yarn. dacron. performance velvet. organza. china silk. broadcloth. flannel. sateen. elastane. taffeta. moisture wicking. antimicrobial" - so pretentious. it's plastic.
For the record, some of those can be real natural fiber fabrics. China silk, jersey knit, broadcloth, flannel, sateen, and taffeta are weaves of fabric, not fibers themselves. Fleece can be a form of wool, too. I have a skirt made out of wool flannel and evening gowns made out of silk taffeta. I lined my winter coat with 100% silk habotai a.k.a. china silk. My favorite sheets are made out of cotton sateen. Etc.
And I think part of the issue is that people are often just… Not taught about fabrics anymore. a lot of the terminology has completely gone by the wayside and we don’t know how to recognize different fibers (or, as seen above, know the difference between a term for a fiber and a weave). I research 19th century clothing and textiles as part of my job, and there are terms even I can’t fit to a certain weave or fiber in my mind. Just the number of different types of natural fiber textiles that used to be in people’s lives is absolutely mind-boggling considering that now it’s all just different forms of plastic 99% of the time
People don’t stand up and demand better because they simply don’t know another way, most of the time. And that’s so sad
Yep, pretty much.
"Microfiber" refers to a variety of different essentially plastic fabrics which all use a very fine thread.
"Viscose" is related to "rayon" and "acetate". All are made from cellulose fibers, most often wood pulp, through a chemical process. They are not plastic, although they are heavily modified.
"Ripstop" is a kind of nylon used for rugged outerwear and luggage.
"Fleece" is a weave, not a fiber. It most often refers to sweatshirt knit, which can be anything from 100% cotton to 100% polyester.
"Jersey knit" is a weave, not a fiber. It's the sort of plain knit fabric they make t-shirts out of. It can be made from any fiber.
"PET" is ethylene polyester fabric made from recycled plastic bottles. It's sold as eco-friendly, but it really is not.
"Vegan leather" is most often pure plastic. There are plant-based imitation leathers but they generally have to be bonded with plastic for greater durability and thus are neither compostable nor recyclable.
"Polyurethane vinyl" is a kind of plastic.
"Lycra", a.k.a. "Spandex" a.k.a. "Elastane" is a stretchy plastic fiber. In the US and Canada "Elastane" is called "Spandex".
"Vegan shearling" -- Uhh, I don't know what this is, sorry. If it's the combo of faux suede and fake fur that it sounds like, it will definitely be made from plastics.
"Acrylic yarn" is a form of plastic.
"Dacron" is a trade name of polyester (plastic) fiber.
"Performance velvet" is a polyester fabric chemically treated to be water-repellent and stain-resistant, used for upholstery.
"Organza" is a weave, not a fiber. It is stiffly-spun threads in an open weave and has a texture sort of a cross between a veil and a soft window screen. It's very common in silk, although there are poly versions too.
"China silk" is silk. Of course. What the heck. It is a very fine, thin, plain weave lightweight silk. (The only thing called "silk" that is not silk is "art silk" which is short for "artificial silk" and means "rayon" (see above). It was big time illegal to call rayon "art silk" for a long time because of deliberately misleading advertisers, but I have seen the term creeping back in online discourse.)
"Broadcloth" is, again, a weave, not a fiber. It's a densely-woven smooth medium-weight plain cloth mostly used for shirts. Historically it was always wool. More recently it was made from cotton. Nowadays poly-cotton blend broadcloths are most common, though you can still get pure cotton and wool broadcloths.
"Flannel" is a weave, not a fiber. It's a soft fabric brushed to have a nap on one side. Flannels used to be all wool or cotton. Microfiber is depressingly common these days.
"Sateen" is a weave, not a fiber. It's a satin weave, but not using silk, popular for bedsheets. Historically it was cotton. These days you can find it in polyester.
"Taffeta" is a weave, not a fiber. It's a crisp, plain, lightweight, tightly-woven fabric. The nicest taffetas are silk. They also come in nylon and polyester, sometimes rayon if you're lucky.
"Moisture-wicking" just means a fabric acts a certain way. It's neither a weave nor a fiber. Wool is naturally moisture-wicking. The term is mostly used these days to describe artificial fibers.
"Antimicrobial" is a chemical finish. It's not a kind of fiber.
I think it's a common misconception that domesticating animals is somewhat like enslaving them. It really is more of a symbiotic relationship. No wild animal would have willingly put up with early humans if they didn't get something out of it. Wolves wouldn't have stayed with us and become dogs if they weren't getting food and safety out of it. Many large herbivores that are now domesticated could and would have easily trampled their early human captors or broken their enclosures open if they didn't have a reason to stay. Sometimes individual animals still do if we don't give them what they need.
The animals that have stayed with us for thousands of years have evolved to cooperate with us better. Dogs have additional facial muscles around their eyes that wolves lack in order to mimic human facial expressions. Sheep grow their wool perpetually while their wild counterparts don't because a bigger fleece means they're more likely to be allowed to breed and be kept around. Domestic dairy cows produce much more milk than wild bovine species and domestic hens lay more eggs. Do you know how energy costly producing eggs or milk is for an animal? It's pretty intense! They wouldn't be able to do that if we hadn't given them the food and safety from predators and the elements to.
And we really need to show these animals respect and gratitude for what they give us by taking excellent care of them. They gave up a lot to be with us, often including the means to take care of themselves in the wild. That's a huge reason why I'm not against using animal products, but I hate factory farming. They are still living, breathing creatures with needs and feelings. They deserve a comfortable life and, when the time comes, a humane death.
The blatant and constant exclusion of Henrietta Wilson not only as a queer character but as a main character in articles following up on Buck’s coming out is disgusting. She has been a proud lesbian since the very first episode, serving as authentic rep on the show. It’s striking that the media’s interest seems to have peaked only with the revelation of a masculine, white character as LGBTQA+ (who they consistently mislabel as gay instead of bisexual, going against the actor’s own words and the network’s public statements). It is telling, but alas, not utterly surprising, considering sometimes they don’t even bother to learn Aisha’s name. It is a disappointing act of erasure that contradicts the show’s message of inclusivity and undermines the very essence of its commitment to representing a wide spectrum of experiences.