About Gaza Funds

PR's Tumblrdome

ellievsbear
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Keni
Sweet Seals For You, Always

Discoholic 🪩

tannertan36
occasionally subtle

blake kathryn
Claire Keane

No title available

Andulka

No title available
Cosimo Galluzzi

titsay
No title available

Product Placement
ojovivo
No title available
I'd rather be in outer space 🛸

seen from United States
seen from Bangladesh

seen from Switzerland
seen from Tunisia
seen from Peru

seen from United States
seen from Saudi Arabia
seen from Vietnam

seen from Bangladesh
seen from T1
seen from Türkiye
seen from Mexico
seen from France

seen from Finland
seen from United States

seen from Italy
seen from Mexico
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Bangladesh

seen from United Kingdom
@puka-reblogs
About Gaza Funds
tumbblr should add a function where during your birthday every single instance of your pfp should have a party hat on top of it
someone tell OP i did it, i spent about 3 hours on it
I don’t know much about the world, but it seems like if you take #misinformation and add it to #truths, you end up with #misinformation.
noobnouns - pronouns - hackernouns - godnouns
bwaow
hi this drives me crazy
canon is what happens in the text. e.g. merlin tries to poison morgana
a headcanon is a fact that you have personally made up as an elaboration of canon. it is your invention. e.g. i think morgana and gwen had a teenage lesbian situationship before the events of canon. or, i think modern morgana would love evanesence.
an interpretation is how one reads the existing text. it is not an invented fact nor is it a headcanon, it is a reading. e.g. i think merlin tries to poison morgana out of misplaced self-hatred. or, i think that one line was delivered with suppressed malice and shows a nuanced relationship.
fanon is the general fandom’s accepted headcanons and interpretations that elaborate or recontextualize canon. e.g. merlin is a badass waif and morgana is a bitch.
these are all different words with different meanings.
Also! Terms that are related to this, but are mostly used on TV Tropes:
* Word of God: The author made a remark about the work's lore that isn't in the book. Can generally be considered canon unless something in the text refutes it.
* Word of St. Paul: An editor or voice actor or actor has made a remark about the work or a character therein that they believe to be factual. Can also be considered canon unless contradicted by the text or Word of God.
* All There In The Manual: supplementary materials give information on the lore. This can fall under either of the above categories if a person relevant to those worked on them.
* Word of Danté: The fans are the only source of this idea, but nothing contradicts it, nostly because the above does not exist for the work in question. Is very similar to "fanon."
Thirsty wunk
QUIZ TIME!! Take this quiz, then come back and answer the poll!
100 Different 'Pokemon' will be shown to you. Choose if you think they are FAKE or REAL. Goal is to get a high score so you can brag to ever
What Was Your Score?
0%-20%
20%-40%
40%-50%
50%-60%
60%-70%
70%-80%
80%-99%
100%! (You're one smart cookie!)
Can anyone explain wtf is going on here especially a Korean speaker
someone on reddit explained 😭
That is one of the most astronomical fuck up translations I have ever seen.
OKAY SIT DOWN SHUT UP, WE’RE GONNA TALK COLORS
THIS IS SAPPHIRE
THIS IS TEAL
THIS IS PERIWINKLE
THIS IS AZURE
AND THIS IS TURQUOISE
WONDER WHY THOSE ALL DON’T LOOK LIKE THE SAME COLOR? BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT
OTHER THAN BEING PART OF THE SAME FAMILY OF BLUES, THEY ARE NOT ALL THE SAME FUCKING COLOR! WHY WOULD THEY ALL BE THE SAME FUCKING COLOR! DO YOU THINK WE JUST NAME NEW COLORS FOR KICKS!?!?!?
WHEN DESCRIBING A CHARACTER’S GOD FORSAKEN EYE COLOR, PICK ONE YA GODDAMN HIPPIE
As someone who is colourblind this post is fucking hilarious because they are in fact all the same fucking colour
things heating up in the fuckin uuhhhhhhhhh BLUE fandom
So uh….. fun fact about turquoise
They come in varying degrees of blue and green.
THIS IS TUMBLR
More of you need to learn about these ☝️
venting on main
my guy
mind the folds
Suddenly struck with a need to explain to you how boat pronouns work (I work in the marine industry).
When you're talking about the design of the boat, you say "it".
When the boat is still being built, your say "it".
When the boat is nearing completion, you can say "it" or "she".
When the boat is floating in the water you probably say "she", unless there is still a lot of work to be done (e.g. no engine yet) then you say "it".
When the boat is officially launched and operating, you say "she". If you continue to say "it" at this point you are not incorrect but suspiciously untraditional. You are not playing the game.
If you are referring to a boat you don't really know anything about you may say "it" ("there's a big boat, it's coming this way"). But if you know its name, it's probably "she" ("there's the Waverley, she's on her way to Greenock").
If you are talking about boats in general, you say "it" ("when a boat is hit by a wave it heels over")
If you speak about a boat in complimentary terms, it's "she" ("she's a grand boat"). If you are being disparaging it may be it, but not necessarily ("it's as ugly as sin", "she's a grotty old tub").
If she has a boy's name, she's still she. "Boy James", "King Edward", "Sir David Attenborough"? The pronoun is she.
If it's a dumb barge (no engine), you say it. But if it's a rowing boat (no engine), you say she.
I hope this has cleared things up so that you may not be in danger of misgendering floating objects.
Hit "view post" and lost it