~*so prity*~

yes hello this is quime ('96, he/him) i'm just another silly gay bitch i guess! also texas from motorcity is my husband

[quimeshine]

it's me and my dearest cartoon husband texas!!! <3 <3 <3

left is a gift by my buddy posduroo (warning: 18+/NSFW art) and right is a commission by my pal @toydrill!!

that's it, that's the pinned post

[segamascott]

[256gb]

currently cackling & wheezing after imagining a video game titled Penn & Teller’s Shithead Basketball

[256gb]

[256gb]

[256gb]

in case you need further proof re: penn & teller’s shithead basketball

[256gb]

i still think it's insane that penn's son showed them my dumb joke and then immediately they made this video on the spot

[zmpl]

[caramelizard-deactivated2025122]

tomorrow im really gonna give it my nothing

[marxism-transgenderism]

tomorrow im really gonna give it my nothing

[xeppeli]

Call of Duty World: Dat War

[xeppeli]

[staryiu]

uncertain abt where i will be sleeping tonight. ive tucked a smallish dog into my bed. i guess i will curl up in the corner..as an action of love

[ethically-sourced-pizza]

[fairycosmos]

no one is coming to save you its true its true someone might be coming to hang outttttttttt though. someday

[dittography-direwolf]

Totally normal for a legitimate for-profit company to refuse to reclaim or stop running their products even after they're no longer being paid to do so. I'm sure it's very normal to just keep running your service for free when your contract's been terminated. Spending money to continue running cameras that supposedly no one is looking at is definitely not an indicator they are just run by the federal government to spy on everyone and only a wacko conspiracy theorist would think so.

[pagliacci2]

If the woman that JK rowling posted an upskirt photo of had been a cis woman snopes wouldn't have said this was "mixed" and you know it.

[vexatiousvic]

Not that it was necessary, but I looked up definitions, and yeah, obviously "taking a photo under someone's skirt" is literally it. Fuck Snopes so fucking hard. I need them to explain to me how it doesn't fit the definition to a fucking t:

And what the FUCK do they mean, "public setting"?? Yeah, upskirts are mistly taken in public fucking settings! That's not an eycuse, that's part of the fucking issue

[pagliacci2]

And truly what do they mean it was in public? Does that mean that the upskirt photos people take on subways dont count because other people are around? OF COURSE IT WAS IN PUBLIC THATS HOW THE PHOTO GOT TAKEN IF SHE HAD BEEN PHOTOGRAPHED AT HOME IT WOULD HAVE BEEN BREAKING AND ENTERING

[doe-eyed-disaster]

what do they mean "it wasn't taken surreptitiously"? there isn't any implication here except that because Freda Wallace was in public, she consented to any pictures that might be taken of her? this is just "look at the way she* was dressed". snopes is doing rape culture.

[estrogenesis-vaporeongelion]

https://archive.is/Nv1K1

according to archives the first version of the snopes article listed it as "true," but it seems to have been changed. given rowling's widely known history of extreme and aggressive litigiousness i'd be willing to bet her legal team probably objected and snopes caved

[whencircuitsshort]

why do people need to be domesticated animals for petplay,. u r my lion i bought you illegallu and you are trying to kill me. go

[thehistorychannel]

[ivy-saurs]

randomly remembered this tweet and had to stop myself from bursting out laughing

[64mpg]

ads targeted to women: omg you are thirtyyyy. kill yourself

[flannelgirlfriend]

I love this post so much my friend put it on my 30th birthday cake

[theconcealedweapon]