GO ON AND HIDE IF THAT’S WHAT TURNS YOU ON!

no TERFs no Radqs no Zionists 🙏🏾

[edwardsallow]

Guess who’s doing writing commissions!

So I moved to the top percentile of most expensive cities in the US unexpectedly, and find myself doing the squidward spare change gif 24/7. As such, I’m now doing writing commissions! Some finished works are up on my ao3 if you’d like to sample them: fandoms I’m already familiar with include Outlast, Far Cry, Fallout, TF2, IASIP, Star Wars, the Yakuza Franchise, Red Dead Redemption, Grand Theft Auto, Dragon Ball, The Tolkeinverse and other such works.

Drabbles (between 500-1000) – $15

Between 1000-1500 – $20

Between 1500-2000 - $25

Between 2000-2500 – $35

Between 2500-3000 - $45

3000 and above – $55 and so on

I am willing to write NSFW, gore, whump and other such taboos. I’ll also write for fandoms I’m not apart of if asked, but I will request extra time to get acquainted with the franchise in those cases. I reserve the right to turn down commissions, though I’ll try to be polite about it. DM me on any of my accounts for info.

[rabirayrana]

Franco being demonstrably less delusional and more in control of himself/prone to constructed thinking than either Phyllis or Leland yet being positioned as the son to her mother and his father feels like it’s saying…..something about the placement of responsibility in heterosexual marriages. Coyle being jealous of his gun, getting pissy about his comparative lack of power - Franco accuses him of being jealous and for once Franco’s right! Coyle is jealous of Franco’s gun and dick stand-in. Coyle can talk about god being generous to him and stingy to Franco but Franco’s rich, and young, and sane, Franco cuckolded his father semi-consensually, Franco likes the treatment Coyle uses to scare people. Franco can’t enter the rooms Coyle enters but he also isn’t constrained by them. Franco is impotent but he’s got more theoretical power than Coyle, because Franco isn’t deeply closeted and willfully ignorant. Though it requires him to put on and put off the idea of being a child.

But like, Franco always did that? He’s less child-minded than he is child-performing. He pretends he can’t control himself. Violence is just a habit of his, though, one he’s been rewarded for, he’s got plenty of control. He’s got more of his marbles than either Phyllis or Leland leastways. He’s using Reagents as a resource while selectively pretending he doesn’t know what he’s doing. He’s “just a scared little boy.” That used to be a status that was inflicted on him against his will, but he leaned into it. If they were a real family, Phyllis and Leland would be mummified in their rocking chairs & Franco would be collecting their medicaid checks. Pretty grotesque!

[rabirayrana]

Are we ever going to confront how much the Warden looks like Otto. “Piss Drinking Simp.” Coyle do you have something to tell us. Are you mad at someone.

[insaneboop6821]

Arora is the only thing getting in their way

[rabirayrana]

Arora is getting in their way the way a whip gets in the way of the dom and the sub

[tgwdlmreprised]

"it reflects badly on your fellow fans" oh my god no not the millions of strangers i dont know how is my reputation gonna survive

[rabirayrana]

So why exactly did you feel so targeted by someone pointing out the moral failure of using women’s supposed sadness over the death of children as a justification for their continued right to abuse children? Answer, quick, since this apparently has nothing to do with you, despite you stuffing your nose into it.

[rabirayrana]

Add The Walten Files to the list of media whose fans worship at the altar of “women have special moral permission to expunge violent urges on people who abuse/kill their children, even if doing so causes further harm to those children, even if it’s expressly against the will of those children, BUT!! That special privilege to exorcise violent urges on people who abuse/kill children IS NOT!!! something that they’re susceptible to when they abuse/kill those children themselves!! You CANNOT get mad at them for abusing/killing THEIR children, you CANNOT hold them to their own standards, you CANNOT start treating them the way they were just treating others for this very crime, those are THEIR kids, it’s only a problem if SOMEONE ELSE does it, they’re ALLOWED to hurt them THEMSELVES its NOT A BIG DEAL cus they’re PROPERTY” and as such deserve every miserable second of the prejudiced drama their fandom experience inflicts on them. Because they are fundamentally the same as the people they hate.

[tgwdlmreprised]

hey you know how the episode literally opens up with a disclaimer of "we dont agree with the actions of these characters" so did you maybe think for a second this is one of said actions and in fact nobody has at all said in the last 3 days rosemary has special privelege to abuse any of her children. also rosemary didnt kill any of her kids so idfk what youre talking about but maybe watch the series before complaining?

edit: lmao someones mad

[rabirayrana]

[tgwdlmreprised]

wow cool arrows did you miss where i said nobody said that, and if they are they clearly cant read

yknow like you

[rabirayrana]

Jesus Christ, I just got done making fun of some anonymous twat for pulling this exact same half-assed “nobody is saying that” straw man that you are. This the fifth time someone has lied about this now!

I’m sorry it reflects badly on your fellow fans, but yes, people very much are saying that, and it’s going to be commented on by others whether you’re comfortable confronting it or not.

[tgwdlmreprised]

i got gnocchi

[rabirayrana]

The post you’re having this cutesy little joke about resulted in someone verbally abusing me, an actual real life survivor, so if we can drop the pink pastel butter wouldn’t melt in my mouth tenderqueer act and engage with the subject as it is, that would be awesome.

[rabirayrana]

Add The Walten Files to the list of media whose fans worship at the altar of “women have special moral permission to expunge violent urges on people who abuse/kill their children, even if doing so causes further harm to those children, even if it’s expressly against the will of those children, BUT!! That special privilege to exorcise violent urges on people who abuse/kill children IS NOT!!! something that they’re susceptible to when they abuse/kill those children themselves!! You CANNOT get mad at them for abusing/killing THEIR children, you CANNOT hold them to their own standards, you CANNOT start treating them the way they were just treating others for this very crime, those are THEIR kids, it’s only a problem if SOMEONE ELSE does it, they’re ALLOWED to hurt them THEMSELVES its NOT A BIG DEAL cus they’re PROPERTY” and as such deserve every miserable second of the prejudiced drama their fandom experience inflicts on them. Because they are fundamentally the same as the people they hate.

[tgwdlmreprised]

hey you know how the episode literally opens up with a disclaimer of "we dont agree with the actions of these characters" so did you maybe think for a second this is one of said actions and in fact nobody has at all said in the last 3 days rosemary has special privelege to abuse any of her children. also rosemary didnt kill any of her kids so idfk what youre talking about but maybe watch the series before complaining?

edit: lmao someones mad

[rabirayrana]

[tgwdlmreprised]

wow cool arrows did you miss where i said nobody said that, and if they are they clearly cant read

yknow like you

[rabirayrana]

Jesus Christ, I just got done making fun of some anonymous twat for pulling this exact same half-assed “nobody is saying that” straw man that you are. This the fifth time someone has lied about this now!

I’m sorry it reflects badly on your fellow fans, but yes, people very much are saying that, and it’s going to be commented on by others whether you’re comfortable confronting it or not.

[tgwdlmreprised]

yeah and you didnt give them any evidence either so

[rabirayrana]

I’m not going around collecting images of people minimizing this woman’s blatant and sustained psychological abuse into “accidents” “arguing” and whatever other shitty misapplied label you want to apply to her to make her seem less to blame for her own behavior as a thirty year old terrorizing a thirteen year old, I’m sorry.

[rabirayrana]

Add The Walten Files to the list of media whose fans worship at the altar of “women have special moral permission to expunge violent urges on people who abuse/kill their children, even if doing so causes further harm to those children, even if it’s expressly against the will of those children, BUT!! That special privilege to exorcise violent urges on people who abuse/kill children IS NOT!!! something that they’re susceptible to when they abuse/kill those children themselves!! You CANNOT get mad at them for abusing/killing THEIR children, you CANNOT hold them to their own standards, you CANNOT start treating them the way they were just treating others for this very crime, those are THEIR kids, it’s only a problem if SOMEONE ELSE does it, they’re ALLOWED to hurt them THEMSELVES its NOT A BIG DEAL cus they’re PROPERTY” and as such deserve every miserable second of the prejudiced drama their fandom experience inflicts on them. Because they are fundamentally the same as the people they hate.

[tgwdlmreprised]

hey you know how the episode literally opens up with a disclaimer of "we dont agree with the actions of these characters" so did you maybe think for a second this is one of said actions and in fact nobody has at all said in the last 3 days rosemary has special privelege to abuse any of her children. also rosemary didnt kill any of her kids so idfk what youre talking about but maybe watch the series before complaining?

edit: lmao someones mad

[rabirayrana]

[tgwdlmreprised]

wow cool arrows did you miss where i said nobody said that, and if they are they clearly cant read

yknow like you

[rabirayrana]

Jesus Christ, I just got done making fun of some anonymous twat for pulling this exact same half-assed “nobody is saying that” straw man that you are. This the fifth time someone has lied about this now!

I’m sorry it reflects badly on your fellow fans, but yes, people very much are saying that, and it’s going to be commented on by others whether you’re comfortable confronting it or not.

[rabirayrana]

Add The Walten Files to the list of media whose fans worship at the altar of “women have special moral permission to expunge violent urges on people who abuse/kill their children, even if doing so causes further harm to those children, even if it’s expressly against the will of those children, BUT!! That special privilege to exorcise violent urges on people who abuse/kill children IS NOT!!! something that they’re susceptible to when they abuse/kill those children themselves!! You CANNOT get mad at them for abusing/killing THEIR children, you CANNOT hold them to their own standards, you CANNOT start treating them the way they were just treating others for this very crime, those are THEIR kids, it’s only a problem if SOMEONE ELSE does it, they’re ALLOWED to hurt them THEMSELVES its NOT A BIG DEAL cus they’re PROPERTY” and as such deserve every miserable second of the prejudiced drama their fandom experience inflicts on them. Because they are fundamentally the same as the people they hate.

[tgwdlmreprised]

hey you know how the episode literally opens up with a disclaimer of "we dont agree with the actions of these characters" so did you maybe think for a second this is one of said actions and in fact nobody has at all said in the last 3 days rosemary has special privelege to abuse any of her children. also rosemary didnt kill any of her kids so idfk what youre talking about but maybe watch the series before complaining?

edit: lmao someones mad

[rabirayrana]

[rabirayrana]

No one is saying what Rose did was right or acceptable in any standard but you're also choosing to ignore the fact that Felix got Edd and Molly killed because he could go a SINGLE night without drinking.

And God forbid she wants to murder the man who killed her kids. Double standards indeed. Have a good day.

What the fuck is it with you people and this seemingly compulsive urge to “no one is saying” things to people are obviously, publicly saying? Cus this is the fourth time this has happened now!

They absolutely are minimizing and accepting Rose’ prolonged, intentional abuse of Sophie, reducing it to a series of ill-defined, demoralized distinctly not abusive “accidents” “arguments” and “badness,” just like all abusive mother apologists do, in every piece of media that makes the mistake of putting them on screen. I’ve had this conversation a thousand times, about a thousand other pieces of media, just like this - where a woman commits a series of blatant and deliberate crime against a child and gets infantilized & insulated from blame, assuming the child themself isn’t fit to be victim blamed, because the class solidarity kicks in and real women feel the need to make the excuses they make for themselves, and their neighbors, for her. You’re not making this about whatever ugly man you’re mad at, and you’re not falsifying a world where “nobody” is doing what they’re doing right now, right in front of your fucking eyes, just like they always do. You are unoriginal and uninspiring.

[rabirayrana]

I’m letting this one go this isn’t worth my energy and it’s not worth yours either. I can’t change your mind and it’s not my place either. I don’t want to discuss this anymore so I won’t be responding. Have a great rest of your life and I mean that genuinely.

Whoops! You’ve already brought harassment to my doorstep for the crime of acknowledging the completely open & blatant abuser that you’re dead set on infantilizing and excusing to protect your own gendered entitlement to children’s bodies. As such, this half-assed expression of ungenuine goodwill is officially DENIED! I hope your life stays the unfulfilled exercise in narcissism and hypocrisy that it already is, and that the gradual acceptance of what this pasty cunt is responsible for leaves your little buddies acknowledged as the worthless abuse enabling scum that they are 🫡

[rabirayrana]

Are we ever going to confront how much the Warden looks like Otto. “Piss Drinking Simp.” Coyle do you have something to tell us. Are you mad at someone.

[weepingwidar]

Fiona Finnegan (Irish, 1979) - Tupelo (2020)

[catcadder8916]

I fear ‘The General’ is just reheating Coyle’s nachos…

If these documents are actually hinting at the next prime asset

Soooo

Another racist with a military background? I mean I understand that there is a difference between the military and police force but I feel like it’s just unnecessary when we already have Coyle

Yes Coyle is no longer an active duty member but he was a U.S. marine if red barrels wants to do military inspired maps I don’t see why they can’t just give them to coyle and instead make a prime asset with a completely new angle

I think it would kind of be a waste of a prime asset slot when there are plenty of other aspects of 1960 society they could instead focus on when coyle already focuses on state enforced corruption

I’d love to see a counter culture inspired prime asset or a civil rights inspired prime asset MAYBE A COMMUNIST prime asset considering the Cold War and all

[rabirayrana]

I remember seeing someone say something like “how dare you call ChiChi an Active Abuser™ you wouldn’t say that about Vegeta” and wondering who exactly is out here saying Vegeta isn’t an abuser because 1. they’re pretty obviously wrong 2. people have been writing Vegeta as abusive for decades now and I’ve watched them do it, because again, that’s what he is and 3. vocally seeking to replicate that obvious narrative erasure on female abusers rather than correcting it is a real mask off moment for your intentions, isn’t it! Not even “they don’t deserve to suffer,” just flat out “you need to pretend she’s innocent no matter how obviously that might be untrue just like you do for male abusers, and if you don’t give women access to the same unfair advantages that men have, you’re a misogynist.” Some people really just wanna be the boot!

[rabirayrana]

Add The Walten Files to the list of media whose fans worship at the altar of “women have special moral permission to expunge violent urges on people who abuse/kill their children, even if doing so causes further harm to those children, even if it’s expressly against the will of those children, BUT!! That special privilege to exorcise violent urges on people who abuse/kill children IS NOT!!! something that they’re susceptible to when they abuse/kill those children themselves!! You CANNOT get mad at them for abusing/killing THEIR children, you CANNOT hold them to their own standards, you CANNOT start treating them the way they were just treating others for this very crime, those are THEIR kids, it’s only a problem if SOMEONE ELSE does it, they’re ALLOWED to hurt them THEMSELVES its NOT A BIG DEAL cus they’re PROPERTY” and as such deserve every miserable second of the prejudiced drama their fandom experience inflicts on them. Because they are fundamentally the same as the people they hate.

[synthfagz]

"if yr stabbed dont take the knife out" okay so thats basiclaly cockwarming

[bilesandthesourwolf]

i can never leave this place

[rabirayrana]

Getting tonguefucked in the ear by this sexy influencer putting her botoxy lips right up against the mic to talk into it about how she used this payday loans app to keep from starving to death in the most agonizingly crispy saliva dripping top of throat valley girl accent this side of the pacific: I should write about Leland Coyle tonight