"you only like her because shes a woman" yup "you let female characters get away with too much" yes "if a man did this you would hate him for it" indeed
Show & Tell
will byers stan first human second

Andulka

Origami Around
🪼
YOU ARE THE REASON
we're not kids anymore.

pixel skylines
occasionally subtle
The Stonewall Inn
EXPECTATIONS
Xuebing Du

No title available
Mike Driver
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
official daine visual archive
Cosimo Galluzzi
Cosmic Funnies

PR's Tumblrdome

@theartofmadeline
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United Kingdom

seen from Malaysia

seen from Denmark
seen from United States

seen from Colombia
seen from Vietnam

seen from India
seen from T1
seen from Germany
seen from Philippines

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Malaysia

seen from Austria
seen from Venezuela

seen from Mexico
seen from Austria

seen from Romania
seen from Austria

seen from United Kingdom
@radfemmll
"you only like her because shes a woman" yup "you let female characters get away with too much" yes "if a man did this you would hate him for it" indeed
Ute Knüppe at Venice Carnvale 2012
photography taken by Ursula Kuprat
One way people have normalized kink/fetish is calling every type of attraction a kink/fetish. You think people who wear glasses are attractive? You have a glasses kink. You find some people's hands attractive? You have a hand kink. You want to have children with your spouse? You have a breeding kink. These people will call anything a kink. And it's because of porn. Sex is no longer a mutual act of attraction and desire, it's deconstructed into specific actions that you play out on another person. That's what porn is like: you watch a "genre" of porn, where a specific action is done to a person (usually woman), or the person has a certain trait. It doesn't matter who that person is, they are just embodying an attribute or action. So these porn consumers aren't attracted to individual people, they're attracted to these attributes or actions, they have fetishes. And they project that onto other people. I once was talking to two friends very casually after we had seen a movie together. There was a scene where an attractive man was barefoot. I mentioned that I thought the guy was hot, and listed reasons why: his long hair, nice pecs, defined hands, nice arms, and cute feet in that one scene. And one friend was like, “You have a foot fetish??” At first I laughed, and explained that no, I don’t have a foot fetish; I don’t have a sexual fixation on feet. But he continued to insist that I had a foot fetish, and that pissed me off. My other friend also joined in and said there’s no shame in having a fetish, no matter how many times I explained that I’m not sexually attracted to feet, I just thought that someone had nice feet - the same way one would think someone has nice hands or arms or legs. I don’t want to suck on someone’s toes, or watch someone step in mashed potatoes and squish it between their toes, or have anyone’s feet come anywhere close to my genitals during sex. I just thought someone’s body looked nice. If I think someone’s hair is attractive, does that mean I have a hair fetish? No. If I was obsessed with hair to the point where I only wanted to focus on someone’s hair during sex, or was only attracted to people’s hair instead of their entire person, that would be a hair fetish. A fetish/kink isn’t just “liking a specific attribute of someone”/“liking a certain action during sex,” it’s a fixation on an attribute or action. I’m tired of people trying to normalize fetish and kink by pretending that everyone has their own fetishes and kinks. No, it’s not normal to obsess over an attribute or sex act to the point where you are using your partner as a vehicle for your fetish or kink instead of being wholly attracted to them. I’m not gonna pretend there’s no nuance, maybe you and your partner just loveee being mutually sexually fixated on each other’s armpits and are still super healthy and love each other or whatever but most fetishes and kinks are dysfunctional and when left to develop usually lead to dehumanization of other people (usually by men to women, or in women’s case they dehumanize themselves for the purpose of kink). The normalization of fetish and kink in this way is insidious and honestly has groomed many young, sexually developing people of my generation (and gen alpha sadly…). Is it any surprise that of the two friends who were insisting I have a foot fetish, one of them was a zoomer male, who frequently would casually mention fetish lingo in jokes, and the other was a zoomer girl who identied as asexual? they have obviously been exposed to porn, fetish, and kink on the internet. It's almost impossible for a young person with internet access to not have been exposed to porn. Throughout my childhood and teenage years I was exposed to absolutely horrific, stomach-churnning sexual content on the internet, and I’m not alone. This shit is affecting people's entire perceptions of sex. They think fetish and kink IS sex. And you either lean into it, or think you must be asexual for not wanting to participate in it.
I’m the eldest lesbian daughter, of course I’m up for the fight
File for printing available at my Patreon
jkr is literally posting upskirt photos to her social media. when will it finally get through to harry potter fans that their support makes her feel confident and correct enough to do things like this
Here is a link to the original panel.
Notice how this is a public space where this person is speaking to an audience. Notice how at about the 50 minute mark, when the camera is facing toward the speakers, you can see this guys entire thighs and parts of his ass. This is a male intentionally exposing himself to an audience and the camera.
Here's the picture in question, btw
Not only did this man chose that outfit knowing he was going to be on stage, in front of an audience and cameras, he chose to cross his legs like this and hold that position. He could have crossed his legs the normal way, which wouldn't have exposed his underwear. He could have worn a different outfit, knowing he was going to be on stage, in front of an audience. He exposed himself like that because he's a pervert who gets off on forcing other people to participate in his fetish with him.
Picture evidence of him forcing other people to participate in his fetish with him isn't sexual assault, it's evidence. TIMs just don't like being called out on their bad behaviour.
follow my feminist meme page on IG here xo
This is extra funny considering how many men foam at the mouth to blame women for the wage gap by claiming the only degrees women get are literature degrees.
Women can’t find well paying jobs because they only study ancient literature and history but they don’t really understand it like men do because men play Assassins Creed.
PSA: don't blame yourself for feeling aroused by pornography and misogynistic kinks. First of all, the fact that you consciously dislike it already means you don't want it — everyone who tells you otherwise thinks like a rapist. And also we live in a society oversaturated with images of female sexual degradation — it would be more surprising if you actually weren't influenced by it in one way or another. Where are you even supposed to get an idea that it doesn't have to be that way? Even fem"dom" is hardly about women being dominant over men. You are not to blame for not developing a healthy sexuality in a world that desperately doesn't want you to. This can be fixed, but with a deliberate effort and power of will, because it requires going against the current.
Always remember that it’s very easy to condition sexual arousal, and it is never your fault for being groomed! Even if you sought it out, even if you used to like it. Whatever reason, it was never your fault.
Especially with the rise of girls being exposed to the internet at increasingly younger ages, we need to try and break the cycle for those girls.
You cannot help others if you have not helped yourself! Practice self love and self forgiveness. Be kind to your past self!
It's absolutely insane that you can say something like "if you watch hundreds of hours of videos of women being beaten, choked, and raped, that says something about how you view women" and people on this website will categorise you with nazis doing book burnings or christians doing witch trials.
"If you are female, expressing hatred for your own body is not just acceptable, it’s practically de rigeur. Failure to indulge in the requisite amount of self-flagellation – my thighs! my skin! my face! – isn’t just negligent, it’s unfeminine. Self-hatred is fundamental to how femininity is constructed, more fundamental than any of the more obvious external symbols (dress, make-up, shoes). What matters is not that you are beautiful, but you know your place in the beauty hierarchy (and since every woman ages, every woman’s place will eventually be somewhere at the bottom).
Young women are encouraged to bond over their dislike of excess body hair, surplus flesh and “uneven” skin. They are meant to do so in a jovial way, egged on by perky adverts informing them what “real women” do: worry about having underarms beautiful enough for a sleeveless top, celebrate curves with apologetic booty shakes and cackle ruefully over miserable Sex-and-the-City-style lunches of Ryvita and Dulcolax. It’s a gendered ritual; men get football and booze, women get control pants and detoxes. We are supposed, of course, to be grateful. Hey, you don’t have to be perfect! Just know you’re not perfect and act accordingly, with the appropriate levels of guilt and shame!
Fairy tale after fairy tale tells us that what matters is being beautiful “on the inside” but what does that really mean? It means submission, obedience and the suppression of one’s own desires. Don’t be haughty and proud. Clean the hearth. Kiss the frog. Love the beast. Suck it up when you’re replaced by a younger model. Sure, you may look fine, but you mustn’t feel fine. You mustn’t be vain. You mustn’t be angry. All fury and pain must be turned back on itself. That way you’ll be a real princess: silent, fragile and never threatening to challenge the status quo."
– Victoria Smith, Almost Famous, real women and the normalisation of self-hate
learned today that one of the hosts of a podcast I occasionally listen to was in the epstein files because of an incident wherein she was being sexually harassed/abused by a man who worked in her field -> she created a google doc for other women in said field to anonymously submit the names of men who had harassed/abused them -> one of these men sued for her for defamation even though she didn’t know him & didn’t even know who his victim was -> he couldn’t afford lawyers & reached out to epstein for funding -> epstein gave it to him -> after 5 years she was forced into a settlement & had to pay him over $100k. the way these predatory men find solidarity with each other is so so so profoundly evil
moids can't cope with the fact that women don't have to get tons of plastic surgery, put on makeup, wear expensive clothes etc. just to be seen as a woman from 10 meters distance with squinting eyes
and when you actually meet and interact with “masculine” women irl they are always the most confident at-ease people, just immediate positive vibes just from being around someone so comfortable with their own identity. that’s the beauty of an identity based in reality and not based on other peoples perception of you 🫶
the most masculine terf still has her pussy with her wherever she goes, like what's the point
girl, get up - doechii 🎵
when a woman makes a thousand disclaimers in order to state an opinion that’s quite embarrassing to me