But this never happens! Everybody respects lesbians’ “preferences” to not date men!

Janaina Medeiros
Cosimo Galluzzi
wallacepolsom
dirt enthusiast
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH

ellievsbear
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
sheepfilms

Product Placement

Kaledo Art
No title available
🪼
will byers stan first human second
hello vonnie

Andulka
noise dept.
Today's Document
todays bird

Discoholic 🪩
Show & Tell
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye

seen from Hong Kong SAR China
seen from United States
seen from Argentina

seen from Türkiye

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Türkiye
seen from Venezuela

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from Argentina

seen from Türkiye
seen from Netherlands

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States
@finnishrogue
But this never happens! Everybody respects lesbians’ “preferences” to not date men!
the thing about being a homeschool abolition hardliner is that people always want to come to you with some bullshit sob story about how you hate disabled people because they were bullied for being autistic and homeschooling was so amazing for them. and it's just like well unfortunately homeschooling is also a widespread tool of coercive control in child abuse used by christofascists to raise kids without the tools they need to function in the world so that they will always be afraid, dependent, and unable to think critically and discern right from wrong and truth from lies. so unfortunately i do think this is a situation where in order to prevent enormous harm to untold numbers of children those bullied kids who just don't wanna go to school are going to have to suck it up. (and in reality what i always propose is a more robust system of alternative/magnet public schooling set up for kids who are basically on grade level but who DO struggle to thrive in a mainstream setting, but nobody ever wants to hear that, they just want to guilt you for not thinking anyone who ever gets picked on should just get to stay home and play vidya and do all their lessons on zoom. and it's like honestly i don't think you're having this argument in good faith bc you are very much centering hypothetical discomfort you MIGHT HYPOTHETICALLY have experienced over, again, widespread child abuse and neglect. so.)
sandra cisneros, the house on mango street / tatyana nilovna yablonskaya - morning, 1954 / anatoly levitin- warm day, 1957 / harry sutton palmer - a cottage garden, 20th c. / phoebe bridgers, i know the end / sarah abraham - one fine morning, 2013 / theo gosselin - denver morning 5, 2015 / gaston bachelard, the poetics of space / federico zandomeneghi - in bed, 1878 / laura ingalls wilder /colley wisson- morning light kyneton australia, 21st c. / @gabi_wahl on instagram / lauren jolly roberts - cecile’s garden, 2006 / maya angelou, all god’s children need traveling shoes
men have such an unbelievable and unshakable victim complex.
It is not nearly common enough knowledge that most Native tribes in the U.S. don't actually own all of the land within their reservation. There are millions of acres of reservation land that tribes don't legally own and they have no control over how that land is used. Like, there are a lot of different concepts tied in with the land back movement, but a major one is literally just getting reservation land back into tribal ownership.
link / archive
I’m going to say something that might sound crazy. Suicide and suicide attempts are sort of a societal alarm bell that says “something is very wrong with the environment this individual was in.” A living being choosing to take themselves out of existence is the most extreme act of distress there is. The state stepping in to silence this alarm bell by funneling suicidal people into a state sanctioned euthanasia program, normalizing this act through a socially accepted bureaucratic system, is not a good thing. It goes hand in hand with the state’s interest in maintaining the status quo at the expense of the population and the psychiatric industry’s interest in individualizing societal problems to extract profit and aid the existing system. It’s saying “there are no complaints here, just people with sick brains, carry on.”
it does not sound crazy
alright I've got to do some quick math to explain attitudes towards AI to my boss.
we're looking to create an AI policy, and when we were talking about this, my boss (older millennial) was genuinely shocked to hear that younger people do not (seem) to view AI positively (a la the recent commencement speakers being booed)
please rb for larger sample size!
Question 1/3
What is your age, and do you feel AI is a net positive or net negative in our lives today?
under 18, AI is a net positive
under 18, AI is a net negative
18-29, AI is a net positive
18-29, AI is a net negative
30-45, AI is a net positive
30-45, AI is a net negative
46-60, AI is a net positive
46-60, AI is a net negative
over 60, AI is a net postive
over 60, AI is a net negative
Question 2/3
How often do you visit or interact with museums/archives (whether in person or online)?
Frequently (multiple times per month)
Often (multiple times per year)
Occasionally (a couple times per year)
Rarely (once every couple of years)
Never :(
Question 3/3
If you saw a museum was using AI in exhibits, marketing, research, etc., would you be more or less inclined to visit that museum?
under 18, more inclined
under 18, less inclined
18-29, more inclined
18-29, less inclined
30-45, more inclined
30-45, less inclined
46-60, more inclined
46-60, less inclined
over 60, more inclined
over 60, less inclined
Thank you for helping with this data collection. Please rb for as big a sample as possible!
🫶
Reblog!!!
i do have to say that no matter how shitty any sort of media is or how shitty your own creations are. always remember
rest in power Marjane Satrapi 🖤🗡️
roald dahl was antisemitic and misogynistic. george orwell was openly homophobic. edgar allan poe married his 13 year old cousin. dr seuss cheated on his wife (and was racist as well as antisemitic!). hp lovecraft was racist as fuck. anyways they’re fucking dead it’s not like you’re enabling their behaviors in the afterlife or something. then again I think they bleed into the books so uh keep an eye out for that
the difference between these old white guys and jk rowling is that the former group is all dead. jk rowling is alive and using your money to oppress trans people
hello i am a deltarune pfp fandomite and i compared a woman who wants bathrooms to be accommodated based on genitals people use to pee and not pronouns, to a fucking rapist pedophile. 10000 people believe this is a normal thing to say
no matter how much OP tries to justify their hatred of jk rowling, it isn't helping. you all come across so misogynistic that it's fucking breathtaking at this point. like we can see right through your bullshit, just admit you want women to stop writing books altogether and go back to kitchen, you fucking coward. why do you even care to do the lip service?
clearly OP doesn't hold a strong hatred towards women, or even want them to stop writing books. JK Rowling is actively anti-transgender and likely uses the money from her sales to fund those anti-trans activities. If we were saying this about the books of a famously prejudiced person from history, you'd all be agreeing with us, so I'm not sure why the person still being alive makes this any different?
some people don't want to fund anti-trans violence
sorry for unnecessarily joining the argument.
there is no such thing as her funding anti-trans violence. that is the fucking point. you are all just misogynists who JUMPED at the opportunity to hate a woman who is writing books the SECOND she did not agree with one thing in your activism (which is that trans women are not females and that women's spaces are for females).
upon further research, she doesn't fund anti-trans violence, but she owns and funds a charity dedicated to sex-based womans rights and TERFism, which is transphobic in itself.
A legal fighting fund for women protecting their sex-based rights
yes, what she is funding goes against the basic belief within trans ideology where trans women claim that their desire for self-expression and validation should override other people's safety and human rights. that is indeed what she is trying to address and dismantle, and in my opinion, it makes her a perfectly reasonable person. you are still free to not support her or her work for this reason, obviously. but to compare her to an actual fucking pedophile? yeah, that is where you just become a classic old misogynist. it's only possible to see these wrongs as equal things if you think that her being a woman somehow worsens her sins.
this is the funniest fucking billboard possible. who the fuck paid for this
discovering radical feminism has made me fall in love with being a woman again. a common smear campaign against the movement is that we only "trauma bond" and believe womanhood is only suffering etc etc but literally no other group of people has made me feel comfortable with my body, proud of my natural skin and unashamed of being a woman.
even though i'm not a radical feminist, radical feminism is literally the only movement i support. no other actual movement restored a sense of womanhood and what it is and means to be a human female. all of us are just so brave even if the entire world hates us under a guise of "bigotry." i appreciate the movement so very much, it's a bit insane. thank you so much for existing.
i was fine with it when i thought it literally means what it sort of implies: that three (or theoretically more but in practice just three) people fall in love with each other in equal amounts and then they have sex/live/date together, all of them at once.
but apparently, i was laughably naive. there is no such thing as actual polyamory, there are only people who don't want to wait for their old relationship to end before they start a new one, and that's it.
certainly it sounds kind of spineless, and very similar to something like being so addicted to smoking you can't stop even for the sake of your own child.
found this revolutionary paper that analyzes every single case of transgender violence across 25 years in Britain, using data from Trans Day of Remembrance. it is the first study that has ever counted trans perpetrators, and the researchers found that trans people were more often perpetrators of violence than victims of it in Britain.
this paper is very comprehensive and has a ton of sources if you wanna do further research on this topic. i recommend reading it and forming your own conclusion.
the actual pride month rundown
- marsha p. johnson repeatedly identified as a gay man and drag queen and survived into an era where the language did already exist if he chose to identify as transsexual. he explicitly stated that he was not transsexual and claimed that all transsexual people were also homosexual.
- sylvia rivera did identify as a transsexual woman (and made disparaging speeches about lesbians). she was not an ally to lesbians. lesbians and transwomen have not always been allies.
- neither of them were there when the stonewall riots began, according to marsha’s own testimony. sylvia was sleeping off a drug trip on a park bench, and by the time marsha arrived at stonewall, the riots were already in full swing.
- storme delarverie, a mixed black gender-nonconforming lesbian and drag king, may have been the one who incited the stonewall riots. she never identified as a transman despite surviving into an an era where the language was made accessible to do so. accounts differ as to who started the riots.
- stonewall was not a special haven for trans people and drag artists, it was just some bar where gay people met up. by all accounts, it wasn’t even a good bar.
- pride as a festival and parade was invented by gay men, lesbians, and bisexual people. fred sergeant is one of those gay men, and he has been beaten (in recent years, as an elderly man) by trans people and their allies due to his views on medical transition. non-homosexual trans people were unheard of in this era.
- this is just united states history, and not even the beginning of gay rights activism in the united states alone. the rest of the world didn’t necessarily base its gay rights activism on stonewall.