Ever since the new trailer came out for the new 50 Shades of Grey movie, everyone and their brother has decided to give both the movie (which no one has yet seen) and the book series (of which most people have only read the first installment) scathing reviews. It seems to be the in vogue thing to do, like when I was in high school and no one was supposed to admit to having read the Sweet Valley High books, and if God forbid someone admitted to reading one, they were to express nothing but disdain for it. Likewise, 50 Shades of Grey is the new litmus test for whether or not you have good taste in reading material. Most of the hatred is not for the writing style, which is admittedly not top notch, but for the relationship between the two protagonists; controlling executive Christian Grey and the object of his obsession, shy college student, Anastasia Steele. The criticisms range from the series not painting an accurate portrait of the BDSM lifestyle to the novel being anti-feminist because Ana allows herself to be controlled and dominated by Christian. Here is my take on the book series, and I stress that I am referring to the series because 50 Shades is not a stand- alone book. I recently read an article comparing the 50 Shades movie to the 2002 movie Secretary starring Maggie Gyllenhall and James Spader. In the article author, Julia Pugachevsky of BuzzFeed, asserts that “Ana and Christian’s romance doesn’t ever blossom into a real, truly loving relationship” even though by the end of the series (spoiler alert) they are in love, married, have a child together, and are expecting another. Similarly Pugachevsky maintains that “Ana grows from her experience with Christian Grey, but not much beyond, Oh, this guy probably wasn’t the best choice.” She says this in spite of the fact that Ana does choose Christian again and again and even ends up marrying the guy! Apparently the author did not finish the book series. A popular internet meme has refashioned the book jacket to read “50 Shades of Abuse Romanticized” and lists signs of domestic abuse such as sexual and verbal abuse, public humiliation, and controlling where one goes and whom one sees. To the opinion of the artist/author Ana clearly must be a victim of domestic abuse. Ana, however, is a brave woman with a strong will. In the course of two weeks, she graduates college, quits her job at the hardware store, moves into a new apartment, starts a job search, and begins a relationship with a powerful and mysterious man. That is one tough woman! As you would expect of such a valiant female character, she exercises her free will on a regular basis. Christian wants to help her find a job, but she insists on doing it alone. He wants her to quit her job at various times, but she never relents. He wants her to exercise and eat more, so what does she do? She never exercises and eats only when she feels like it. The only place Ana is submissive is in the bedroom, which brings me to their sexual relationship. Ana continues in the dominant-submissive relationship because she chooses to. She is free to leave at any time. Moreover, she has her own apartment that she can go to and a support network of friends and family. People in abusive relationships are generally denied those things. She even learns to stand up to her pushy college roommate, who apparently has been bossing her around for years. Even in the sexual context of the red room, Ana is free to say “no” through a safe word. When Christian worries that it all might be too much for her, she assures him that she is where she wants to be and that she “likes rough sex.” Painting a woman like this as a victim is inaccurate at best, and anti-woman at worst. Then there are the holier-than-thou readers who pretend to be shocked by the sexuality of the book. One reader of the article mentioned above even commented that a woman who watched the movie had no right to complain about her husband watching pornography! I think most people are intelligent enough to know the difference between pornography and what the MPAA will allow in a rated R movie. So am I to suppose that this sanctimonious reader has never watched a rated R movie? Are we all supposed to be shocked that there are women who like sex or that there are women who prefer for men to take the lead in the bedroom? Or is it just their own lack of imagination that doesn’t allow them to envision anything beyond the missionary position? I read and enjoyed all three books in the series for what they were (erotic love stories about a non-traditional relationship between two deeply human characters) and not for what they weren’t (a BDSM how-to manual.) In the end it is a work of escapist fiction meant to entertain the reader, not an instructional guide or a great work of literature. If you read them with this in mind, you might find yourself delightfully entertained…just don’t tell anyone. Update: the movie has been released since the original writing of this review, and I can say that it was better than I had hoped. Gone are E.L James' cringeworthy metaphors and Anastasia's internal dialogue between her self conscious and inner goddess