Garbage Opinions and Shit Takes

[beardedmrbean]

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DVmWVOyyD2-/?igsh=MW40ZHk2dmV5MnV4cg==

Finally someone says what we were all thinking.

[reasonreblogs]

The presence of the Canadian Air Force just coming and going like this is unacceptable. How can we condone a force that shits from the sky onto CHILDREN out at recess???

[feminismisstillahatemovement]

[feminismisstillahatemovement]

Apparently the SPLC and BlueSky users are already claiming that the paid operatives were just going undercover to passively gather information on white supremacist groups. I asked Grok to read the court documents and weigh up if this defense had any merit:

It's hard to claim to donors you're trying to destroy racist groups while secretly paying millions of dollars of their money over decades to the leaders of those groups, and those groups continuing to exist.

[beardedmrbean]

Demand outstripped the supply so they had to manufacture it, apparently the tragic story of jussie smolette didn't teach them anything.

[generallemarc]

Grok. Is not. A source.

If you didn't go in and do at least a keyword search to verify that summary, it's worthless. Y'all are smarter than this, c'mon.

[yourtoradorasextendedwarranty]

Grok sites all it's sources if you ask it to. So while yes, you are correct that it's not a source, it's an aggregate. And we do not know if the sources were checked.

However this is known information that was said on an interview publically. So regardless this information is correct.

[generallemarc]

I mean, the broad strokes of the SPLC's dumbass attempt at covert ops are already known publicly, my issue was inherent with using a chatbot. It doesn't matter if we know that it didn't just invent that entire summary out of thin air, what matters is that any chatbot can never be trusted as a source due to ai hallucinations. Absent that citation, this is worthless, because aside from what we already know from public knowledge, any of those specifics could be hallucinations until and unless we go through and verify all of them. Hence why actual sources are needed that aren't just a chatbot response.

[yourtoradorasextendedwarranty]

Well that's my point. Grok is one of the better ones at not hallucinating. Mind you the picture could have been sent after the sources were checked. I know when I use Grok at all I go into the listed links and keyword search. Hell I actually have gotten to a point in which if I find information that is written weird I will tell it to go back into a certain source and correct the information based on it or use direct quotes from said source. SURE, I'm persistent like that, and I know not everyone is or does what I do. But at the very least at least it cites it sources and those can be opened from the page.

[generallemarc]

If it's less prone to that then that's fine, but my point, probably not expressed as well as it should've been, was that without asking for it to cite all its sources the info is still untrustable. But honestly even then you'd still need to go over them directly for confirmation, although maybe I'm being dense and what you're trying to say is that that's the point of asking it for sources, so that they can be included in the image and everyone reading it now has the ability to verify for themselves on the information the bot is claiming to have used.

[proai-conservative]

Keep telling yourself that and keep being a Luddite

[generallemarc]

Yeah, only Luddites insist on verifying AI summaries instead of blindly trusting them not to hallucinate.

[siryouarebeingmocked]

"New = good" is also a fallacy. Appeal to Novelty, specifically. I don't like it when anyone uses AI as their entire argument, even if I support the point they're making.

[reasonreblogs]

Always verify the sources. Trusting an AI summary is exactly how my mom got the incorrect assumption about a question and soured an auditor on us (optics were not great because she clocked it as an obvious lie too). The AI told me something different about the same question. When I checked the sources, there were outdated links that no longer had the pages it was citing and the rest never touched on the answer it gave. For both the answer my mom got and when I asked the same question where I got the complete opposite answer.

It wasn’t Grok, but it still doesn’t mean don’t check or cite the sources it gives you. Acting like it’s sources are infallible and totally backs up how it interprets the info but not citing the sources doesn’t mean any more than a human doing the same with a source of “trust me bro.”

[cheshireinthemiddle]

My job is forcing us to make new company accounts and you need to select 5 security questions from the predetermined list.

Theyre trying to make these unique so theyre harder to guess, but theyre just ridiculous. Here's a small sample.

What was the first exam you failed?

Where did your mother and father go for their first date?

What was your favorite teacher's middle name?

What is your favorite breakfast food?

What street was your mother born on?

What future job did you want as a child? (I wanted to be a chef. My job is chef. Easy guess.)

What was your first word as a child?

How old were you when you first ate your favorite food?

What was your GPA at the end of your first year in high school?

[siryouarebeingmocked]

I can answer precisely two. The third one is a toss-up between 2 or 3 possibilities.

The only teacher I know the middle name of is a relative.

[reasonreblogs]

Trick is to write something more memorable to the question than an actual answer. Like “this is stupid” “like really stupid” “good luck guessing this one.” No one can really tell you those aren’t answers no one else will get. Unfortunately you’d have to remember it but it might be easier if you’re particularly annoyed.

When I get to write one of my own, I know no one is ever going to get “My fandom focus in high school.”

[not-terezi-pyrope]

It's freaky how the brain will just plasticly learn novel motor output interfaces on the fly. It's almost like instead of hard coding a control scheme for anatomy that changes every few million years the strat that brains went for was to be openly reconfigurable to fit around whatever its nerves seem to be hooked up to via observed feedback.

I think they've done tests on this by getting people to pilot novel bodies in VR. But you don't tend to notice it day to day until something weird happens like just now. I was reading a paper book and it had a line of text blacked out as if redacted. Instinctively I go to move my cursor over the black line to see if I can read any text if I highlight it.

Except it's a book and not my computer screen, so the cursor my brain thinks it's moving across my field of vision in front of me doesn't exist. At the same time, my right hand is making a bunch of small involuntary movements next to me. I didn't intend to move it and didn't even notice it was moving until I saw it with my eyes. What I intended to move was my Cursor, something that my brain had learned to understand that it has, and the way it moves this is by actuating the muscles in my right arm, an action that is entirely disconnected from any intent to move my arm, which is a different thing.

I love being a pattern atop this eldritch mess of neurons, it's great

[pfaugh]

father I cannot click the book

[reasonreblogs]

The common digital artist habit of trying to hit “ctrl+z” but then remembering that you’re drawing on actual paper with a pen.

[funbearer]

[leonidasnoir-2]

Ask can I go back ONE MORE DECADE.

[apologiesnope]

Celebrate.

[tgvqaz]

(my Thanks to: @apologiesnope blog)

[salt-n-tigers]

Buy gold

[brosef-von-dudehomie]

Fucking suffer because I was a 13 year old living with two families under one roof in "hyper poverty" chapter of my life. I have no money, no friends, no privacy, and several learning disabilities that weren't even recognized at the time.

But what I do have is 5 years to train to get a better position in the Navy and the knowledge to invest in that weird little upstart online book store.

[salt-n-tigers]

‘95 was an amazing year for me. I was 23, fit, good looking, and had a great job. I was still immortal then and oblivious to politics. I had been dating my gal for 2-3 years already and had life by the short hairs. Wages were up, rent was down, work was everywhere. If I could go back and spend half my disposable income on gold or dirt instead of whiskey and beer, I’d be wealthy now.

I’m sorry to learn that you were in an almost opposite predicament then @brosef-von-dudehomie but 1993-97 were some of the best years I’ve ever known.

[dv-doll]

I was a toddler...

But if I'm a toddler in 1995 with my now adult knowledge? Now we're cooking.

[azzy-the-christian-furry-deacti]

I didn’t even exist in 1995.

[beardedmrbean]

Invest a shit ton of money in Apple and Google

[generallemarc]

Sorry to be That Guy, but the first commercially-available cell phone was released over a decade before this. There absolutely are cell phones, just not smart phones. You can make and receive calls anywhere with service, but not much else.

[siryouarebeingmocked]

If I'm a kid again, make better college choices. If I'm an adult, invest in Sony. Then in a few years, Apple and Samsung. Then Nintendo.

[reasonreblogs]

I’d be 5 but yeah if there’s retention on some level of my life to now, that’d be a game changer.

Also to generallemarc, cell phones existing doesn’t mean it was nearly as widespread as now. My parents didn’t have cell phones until around 2000. If any kid had one, it was considered a “rich kid” thing. My earliest memory of a kid with a cell phone was literally 9/11 because he was the only one that had the vague info of “some buildings got knocked down in New York.”

Didn’t have a flip phone till 2006.

Kinda makes me think of the ep of South Park where Token was the rich kid who said he’d bring over a movie but brought over a DVD while everyone else was still on VHS. Something being available doesn’t mean everyone was using it from that moment on. Tho I do get it was to the “no cell phones” point. I think it’d be more interesting to see how many people answering this had a cell phone at the time to begin with.

[flork-of-cows-official]

Today in Flork news.

[flork-of-cows-official]

Two hours later.

[flork-of-cows-official]

[flork-of-cows-official]

Critical update

[reasonreblogs]

”When did copper get so expensive?”

Tariffs. Since the company I work at buys some machine parts for jobs, there’s copper in some of them. There’s just one specific part we get from Canada that they stocked in huge batches at a time and they finally ran out this year. When I placed our most recent order our guy gave me the heads up that the price would double from $200 to $400 at the start of 2026. Everyone’s prices have been going up so I completely understood he had to do what he had to do.

Told him I was both glad to be putting in the order before the price increase and sorry he’s being hit so hard by the tariffs. He told me basically the real insult to injury of it is he couldn’t get any good American liquor anymore either.

[goth-queen]

[generalluxun]

This is honestly why I don't like the modern takes on How the Grinch Stole Christmas. The point of the original story is that the whos are good people, who care about the spirit of sharing. They celebrate with fun toys but without the toys the holidays remain.

When the dude who literally stole everything from their houses rolls back in, they give him the head seat at the table. There is zero animosity on their part *because they keep the spirit of Christmas*.

Modern retellings are *a* story, but they completely lack the message of the original. They make the Whos into the Grinches. Now they're the ones who lack spirit.

The original message was be like the *kind and giving* people. The Grinch discovers kindness and it makes him stronger. It makes him better.

And it did it all in ~20 minutes.

[greater-than-the-sword]

Seriously- I can't believe I have to say this, but "How the Grinch Stole Christmas" isn't about ostracism, or capitalism, or anything like that.

My Jordan-Petersonesque analysis: the Grinch is about a man who has isolated himself from all of society (except apparently one sycophant who literally can't argue and whom he horribly abuses) and went to live in a cave high in the mountains because he was so misanthropic.

There he blocks out all of society who could shame him by comparison to his badness, except once a year when he hears the sounds of joy at Christmas and he can't block it out.

It's important that when the Grinch says he's irritated by the noise, he is lying to himself. It's not the who's lack of consideration or excessive noise that is getting to him, or his hatred of materialism. He tells himself that it is a hatred of their materialism because he is envious of their happiness, which he tells himself comes from their belongings, so he tells himself that he is right to hate them. Thinking that happiness comes from belongings is an inherently materialistic impulse, so the Grinch is not anti-consumerist, if anything he is more consumerist than the Whos. And so he envies their stuff.

And he takes them for everything they have. And then when he realizes that their happiness didn't come from their stuff, but from being part of a loving community, he realizes that he's been the one responsible for his own unhappiness via his self isolation. That's why he gives all the who's stuff back, and they are fortunately good enough people to immediately welcome him into their community.

[anamericangirl]

OP read Dr. Seuss and somehow managed to miss the entire point.

[emmaubler]

This is why it's important to ignore terrible remakes (i.e., the movies, who have to stretch a picture book into an hour and half and decide to fill their time with Important Messages and modern storytelling tactics that require us to understand the villain is really the victim) and go straight to the source materials.

[reasonreblogs]

OP read Dr. Seuss and somehow managed to miss the entire point.

My dude, not even that, the story they describe is the plot to the Jim Carey Grinch. Literally nothing about a Tragic Backstory to be seen in the original.

[wildgifthorses]

We're a little past this era but when people were like "actually being more conscious of the political implications of blah blah blah could let you take this in a more interesting direction!", this was generally true but it was kind of sleight-of-handing away that (1) you can make pretty much any genre fiction more interesting by adding more sophisticated political reflections but (2) if you want this to be possible, you have to allow the reflections in question to take forms other than pure party-line tumblr leftist propaganda, i.e. your evaluative criteria have to be "apolitical". Which is to say that people who demand that you "think about the political implications of XYZ" are distinctive not in that they want you to think about politics but in that they want to stop you from thinking about politics, since "thinking" creates the possibility of an outcome not in conformance with the party platform. This also goes for any subset of "politics", i.e. "this would be better if you thought more about race", "this would be better if you thought more about homophobia", etc.

[gabelincoln]

This is also the source for the "keep politics out of X" lines that were mocked/called hypocritical. People knew that they were being preached at for political propaganda but they didn't have the vocabulary to express the idea that they didn't want to be preached at.

[siryouarebeingmocked]

I actually saw a lot of people explicitly saying that they prefer more subtle, less preachy political content. Even if it disagreed with the complainer.

Some argued that the hamfisted political messaging was actually counterproductive for the women and minorities it was trying to help.

For some reason, the opposition never addresses those folks.

I wonder why.

It's also hypocritical that a lot of the opposition wanted people to be aware of "bad" Representation™ when it politically benefited that opposiition, but not when their team was doing it.

You're just supposed to shut up and go along and consume product.

[reasonreblogs]

This makes me think of the recycling episode of Rocko.

Joe Murray actually really cared about environmental issues so he was reluctant to make an episode about it because he didn’t want it to come off as preachy. Other writers convinced him that as a musical, they could be more tongue in cheek about it. Joe Murray agreed under the condition Rocko didn’t sing.

I don’t think it’d be a stretch to say it’s one of if not the most remembered episode of Rocko and for good reason. They were right, the humor and musical aspect carried the environmental essays really well. I think something that helped was directly mentioning that fluorocarbons are what destroys the ozone layer and 🎶come from a variety of places~ like styrofoam containers and aerosol cans🎶

I’d say it’s a really good example of 1. Knowing your message 2. Knowing the audience 3. Knowing the general perception of bringing up the issue you want to talk about (environment messaging usually seen as “preachy” by default) and 4. How to deliver it knowing all this

It wasn’t subtle but above all else, it was funny af, memorable, and the songs were great. It’s more making a case to the audience even when preaching rather than proselytizing.

[punkrorschach]

ive said it before and i'll say it again but carrying a weapon does not make you safer, it gives the person assaulting you a free weapon. i know we live in a time where fear is profitable and the cute pink stun guns make feminism sexy but they do not work like you think they do.

there is an extremely slim chance you will be able to deploy the pepper spray/taser/gun in a way that does not harm you at all. pepper spray blows back, guns miss, tasers slip. there is a much much larger chance things go poorly and you end up getting hurt worse than originally intended because now your assailant is pissed and more heavily armed.

im not talking out my ass here, i'm a case manager at a homeless shelter for addicts. we have a lot of violent behavior. none of our staff carry any sort of weapons. we are trained to de-escalate or remove ourselves from the situation. i have worked there over two years without being harmed despite intervening in many fights and having weapons pulled on me.

there is safety in numbers. there is safety in well lit streets and staying on your phone and knowing when to scream and run. there is no safety in "personal defense items".

[generallemarc]

"Don't try to defend yourself because your attacker will steal your weapon" is the final form of the obsession with victimhood. If you somehow have developed this as a takeaway and not "learn how to use the weapons you carry", you are not someone I would ever trust with these kinds of situations. Nobody with this kind of thought process should be.

[reasonreblogs]

Some “I don’t wear a seatbelt because they’ve broken bones” shit

Real “there’s been a steep increase in head injuries since we began using armored helmets so they must be involved. Somehow the death toll is way lower but I’m sure it’s unrelated” clownery

[sometimes-men-need-help-too]

Now I know some people get tired of seeing gender reversals online ("well if a man did this...." )

But hear me out

Sometimes it's good for us to think about how we would respond in a similar situation but with the genders reversed

Your first inclination may be to say that you wouldn't change your response, and some of you wouldn't. But others would. And I think it's important we recognize any bias we may have

[reasonreblogs]

It was kind of nice to see AITA commenters reflect on that when they realized they had given a completely different judgement and had genuinely felt differently to two posts that were exactly the same but the genders were reversed. It was the actual proof that there was a gender bias on the sub. I was kind of surprised by how many people admitted that they had been biased and started reflect rather than double down or quietly ignore it.

[girlactionfigure]

[kingofdersecest-2]

?????? Does the amazon warehouse know that the buyer of these products is jewish? does the delivery driver? I question the logistics of this, because im pretty sure the workers at amazon just pack the shit up, slap the label on it, put in the truck and the driver plops that shit on the doorstep before doing it another 8000 times that day. So I question when in this process someone looked at the shipping address, somehow discovered the person living there was jewish, and wrote this, apparently multiple times to multiple people because the caption says "friends" as in multiple people are receiving this. Though its possible its not Amazon at all and someone else is running up to the packages after they're delivered writing this, and then running away. Dunno.

[siryouarebeingmocked]

I just assumed it was some local jerk who knew that the recipients were Jewish, not Amazon.

[reasonreblogs]

If true, I’d assume it’s anyone with an “obviously” Jewish last name.

[dryiffsrevitalizingtailholetonic]

lmao "missing money from the pentagon is why they 9/11'd it" dude do you have any idea how much money the state steals from us and sends to a black hole?

The idea the deep state needed to 9/11 away embezzlement or what have you is comical. It's an idea from someone so naive they don't have any idea how the government works.

"Oh no we put all this money into black ops, what do we do? Better 9/11 it!" Said no one in government ever. It's more like "lol those morons can't do fuck-all about it, let them eat shit."

I wish I lived in the world these people lived in, where the state had to concoct all these elaborate plots to hide stealing money and so on. It's a fucking fantasy. These ghouls proudly, loudly steal from us. Again it's simply ridiculous.

[siryouarebeingmocked]

Also, like many (most) conspiracy theories, the power, and competence you'd need to pull off the conspiracy would mean you wouldn't need to do the actual conspiracy.

[reasonreblogs]

And I mean… incompatible software between departments is not only RIGHT THERE but TRUE. Literally found out the IRS runs on DOS when I asked the poor lady apologizing or how slow the system was. I asked if it was a money or security thing and before I even finished the question she said it was a money thing.

Incompatibility of software is both how a lot f money goes unaccounted for AND becomes a very convenient cover for any money intentionally. The simplest solution is usually the easiest and something boring like “office issues” is a lot better than like… the biggest terrorist attack on the US.

I’m not saying I believe this is what 9/11 was, but when you’re orchestrating some kind of conspiracy, a massive attack on the public is what you pull off as a pretext to take some kind of drastic action like invading other countries. There’s likely multiple underlying motives that are determined can’t wait longer for something to ACTUALLY happen. Anything else is just not letting a tragedy go to waste.

[dracula61]

[bite-sized-morsels]

So I put this up to see if it would draw the criticism I expected. (Hoped for?) That it’s obviously fake. That all I got was crickets could be a function of my 4 followers. But I now return to point out some of the inconsistencies that should have raised eyebrows.

First, what gorilla enclosures have four foot fences?

Second, what mother is going to patiently wait for the big gorilla to hand their baby back instead of hoping over the fence and putting the baby on the other side away from the gorilla? I mean maybe some freaks would be curious, but….

Third, what is that noise it makes? That doesn’t sound like s gorilla noise.

Fourth, and more visually conclusive, the mother’s hands melting into the gorilla’s arms.

“AI” should require a warning label. Because the younger generations already have a hard enough time differentiating between fantasy and reality. Also you can’t complain about older people being grouchy when they have to be suspicious of every video shared on social media.

[feminismisstillahatemovement]

It's crazy how many people reblog something like this and never notice it's fake. Unless they're AI too.

[siryouarebeingmocked]

I figured it was fake when the gorilla stood up. Something seemed off.

[reasonreblogs]

Gorilla’s hand phases right through the lady’s arm when handing off the baby.

[eurodynamic]

[twinflamedreams]

While i am all for the potential of AI for good (which so far we aren’t seeing sadly)

This is crazy. We should absolutely acknowledge the fact it is shameful not to be able to think 600 words by yourself. Someone deserves to fail so they can learn to do better if they cannot write a few paragraphs.

They want people to be helpless, drooling, slaves.

People today literally cannot do anything for themselves and trusting chatgpt for everything is going to make that so, so much worse.

Many of us are out here typing that on our phones, you can write or type that up in a few minutes. Quit being lazy. 😂

[999888777999-deactivated2025100]

“Yet im still failing” hmmmm its a mystery

[yourtoradorasextendedwarranty]

It's weird. These people are without critical thought at all. It's weird with this, "I can't write 600 words about anything". Really? I could write circles around some book writers about pointless nonsense. Would a lot of it be circular? Yes. But I could still very much do it. Some of my longer posts on here probably come close to 1000 or more. These people need to learn critical thinking and creative writing.

FUCK the Department of Education. And good riddance.

[cookingwithroxy]

I'm going to put this out here. ONE of my OC posts is 2128 words, and I wrote it for an adult RP site. And it's only PART of my Mage profile.

My rather simple one for my gothbot? 801 words. My Dullahan? 854. Vampire? 468.

These are all just things I do for fun! But if I can write up some nonsense for my characters and hit 600 with little to no problems in far less than an hour?

[reasonreblogs]

Just wanna push backs little on the statement we aren’t seeing any good from AI for a sec here.

It’s all about what applications of it you’re looking seeing. This vid changed my perspective on the use of AI because my exposure has mainly been generative text and images rather than the actual scientific applications. This would probably be what most average people will encounter and base their opinions about AI on rather than something like mapping hundreds of millions of proteins in a fraction of the time it took humans to map 150,000.

[reality-detective]

Repeat the lies often enough and people will believe them. 🤔

[unpopularpolitics]

In the past they've had to turn off their sensors so they wouldn't be damaged by the radiation. Now they want to study the radiation, which means leaving the sensors on. That's the problem they need to solve this time.

[siryouarebeingmocked]

Reminder that the astronauts left reflectors on the moon that have bounced back photons, and the Russians had ever motive to expose a fake moon landing.

[beardedmrbean]

We have photographs of the landing sites that were taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, pretty sure countries other than the US have satellites that have gotten pics of them too.

How to see all 6 Apollo landing sites on the Moon

Locate all 6 landing sites of Apollo 11, 12, 14, 15, 16 and 17 on the Moon, including interesting lunar features to observe with a telescope

[siryouarebeingmocked]

One denier claimed that the reflectors and samples were actually placed/collected by drones.

Okay, but if you have the capability to send a drone, it's not much harder to send people. Possibly easier, because you don't have to cover it up.

[querulousglare]

I think the claim that we had the technology to send drones back then (even as recently as 40 years ago) is way, way more far-fetched than the claim that we sent astronauts.

This is one of the tells of a false conspiracy theory: in order to account for all the facts, as well as new facts that get discovered, the theory has to grow more and more convoluted until it's way more far-fetched than the supposedly false reality

[marinemas]

And all for what?

The people purporting this conspiracy never actually explain why it was done (and never revealed)

It’s not like the US was shy bragging about other ways it got one over on the USSR

[reasonreblogs]

You also literally cannot fake the photo lighting without the photos themselves being doctored and I’m guessing the reason the major criticism ISNT that they are doctored and the SETTING is faked means the photos are verified as not being doctored enough that isn’t the leading argument the deeper you get.

[thememedaddy]

[cryoverkiltmilk]

It was really bad.

[mooncustafer]

Cartoon from the 1990s:

[jenroses]

So bad. We take local smoking laws into account on deciding where to travel not because we smoke but because we don't.

[earhartsease]

we remember going to a gay club in cambridge (england) just after the smoking ban kicked in, and it turns out there are Other Smells (mainly sweat and cologne and poppers)

but at least we lasted more than 20 minutes in there, which had been our previous limit when everyone in there smoked

[reasonreblogs]

I grew up with a bunch of smokers which makes the smell of the smoke itself kind of nostalgic for me…

That said, when I was being shown houses a couple years ago, there was one place where she opened the door, I got within a couple feet and was SLAMMED by the smell of many a cigarette smoked inside without ventilation for what I oils guess DECADES.

We didn’t go in. She looks at me and goes “we’re done here?” and I go “we’re done here.”

[siryouarebeingmocked]

Video: Here’s a Tesla in winter, with the door handles stuck in the door. Comments: Wow, Teslas are terrible! Other comments: Regular cars also freeze up. Also, Teslas have remote defrosting for exactly this problem. First comments: Well, what if your battery is dead, or you lost your phone? You shouldn’t need to do this for any car! Me: That certainly is a principle you just made up, about a problem that’s existed about as long as cars have. Me: I feel like y'all just want an excuse to hate Tesla. Me: And that’s coming from someone who doesn’t like e-cars.

[reasonreblogs]

Thing is the handle is flush with the door and it’s not quite as obvious this is how you fix it. I can at least get a firm hold on the handle of my car door to pull without having to look it up. I think the problem is more this seems to be a “hidden feature” than straightforward. Tho if there’s an upside I suppose this means Tesla owners will know where to find the owner manual for their cars… once they can get in.

My dad recently on a walk ran across some folk trying to find the jack for their car but instead called AAA and he’s like “you check the owner manual?” and they didn’t know where that was. So I guess enough hidden features and people might start being aware of that again.

Not a fan of the cars either but looking to dunk on literally everything is embarrassing when there’s actual legit things to dunk on.