Thoughts: Boyers Four Principles of Scholarly Activity
Over the past three weeks and three sessions conducted I feel it is important to reflect on the process of Scholarly Activity and the mode in which I Have thought about it and conducted it.
Using Boyers model of scholarship will help me to home down how I have been opporating as a scholar. The best way to do this is to simply go through each of the four principles.
Boyers first principle asks:
• 1. The scholarship of discovery that includes original research that advances knowledge.
What am I doing? Is it helping anyone? Yes, it is. The project is about
delivering information to an audience about something that is little know in the form of a video. The condition of Pulmonary Hypertension is little known about. Until this condition came to my attention, admittedly I knew nothing about it, therefore the output for this project, is designed to deliver information to such persons as myself who do not know or hold any prior knowledge about Pulmonary Hypertension.
With this said I am operating with this first principle as the foundations of this project and the outcome that is desired.
The second principle asks:
2. The scholarship of integration that involves synthesis of information across disciplines, across topics within a discipline, or across time;
Picking this project up again with students does fulfill this principle. Students have created images/designs from primary research. Therefore the synthesis of information has already occurred, it is not about quantifying this information and extra research into a package that can be delivery to a group operating outside of the confines of the academic institution. The PHA UK charity is the final bearer of this projects out and will be of a benefit to them. The learning from the students will benefit a social and medical issue that needs more visibility and awareness in the healthcare system.
The third principle asks:
The scholarship of application (also later called the scholarship of engagement) that goes beyond the service duties of a faculty member to those within or outside the University and involves the rigor and application of disciplinary expertise with results that can be shared with and/or evaluated by peers.
This answer was partially answered previously as the, beneficiaries of this outcome will be PHA UK and every piece of diversity in helping them spread their awareness will help. The review of peers is something that I have not had time to address. As an academic this my be classed for me as other colleagues but as students are working with me as partners they are included in the word ‘peer’. The sessions so far are working on a 1:1 basis and that has been acting as myself having the disciplinary expertise to facilitate the students desired outcome. The element of rigor would come from the decisions later on in this process of placing the video together making sure the information within it is communicating correctly.
Finally the forth principle asks:
The scholarship of teaching and learning that the systematic study of teaching and learning processes. It differs from scholarly teaching in that it requires a format that will allow public sharing and the opportunity for application and evaluation by others.
Publically facing would be this information that is being read now, and I thank you for making it this far. The purpose of this blog is to document the process of working with students as partners, all out comes and imagery are documented here and available for public viewing.
On reflection of this project so far I feel that I am working to Boyers Scholarly Model and touching upon them well. Working with students is currently working well as long as student have as much control on the process as I do.
Boyers four principles do make you think about how you create work and the pedagogy involved. My thoughts on these are that it does feel very natural to run any project through these stages, not necessarily in order but as a linchpin for a project such as this, theya re more than useful to refer to.
The part of this that I felt has surprised me is that students returning to work that is in their mind finished have been glad to do so and in the last workshop conducted my student was happy that he could see his work in a completely different light now that it was moving. It will be interesting to see how his practice now evolves.