A few quick 134 thoughts or else I will actually burst …
I’ve been consumed with real life so talking about Attack on Titan and responding to online friends has taken a backseat, but I am eager to talk about the chapter as soon as I have a moment. Since that keeps not happening, I thought I’d drop just a few quick thoughts now.
I’ve long hoped for a “cruel yet beautiful” ending but with this chapter I’ve giving up hope on anything other than cruel. This chapter was game over. Nothing can repair the damage that’s been done. The world has been rumbled and millions of innocents have been mercilessly slaughtered. No matter who, no matter where. The devout offering prayer at the temple, the urban and affluent in the city, the rural families running with no escape all met the same fate.
Meanwhile those who actually bear some guilt in this are being shown to have a change of heart. While the natural reaction would be anger, they are instead expressing remorse and vowing to do better. None of that matters either. If innocents and those having a change of heart are instantly slaughtered, what’s the actual point?
It makes me wonder about the overall messaging here. Everyone including the 104th, the Alliance, Kiyomi, the General, and the crowd gathered at Fort Slava are willing to accept blame for the rumbling, yet there’s been very little blame assigned to the person doing the rumbling and surprisingly little anger towards him. I don’t know if that’s clumsy messaging on Isayama’s part, or if we are supposed to at least partially recuse Eren from this horror. That bothers me. I dropped that thought in a discord and my friend Kingsgrave shared his thoughts. I’ll end with those because it provides a lot to think about.
I think the narrative supports Eren a little too much. His ideas and rationalizations are treated as inevitable and not really pushed back on by the main cast, the main cast just laments about how terrible the world is.
We also never really had anyone in the narrative actually support alternatives, often they were proposed by some 3rd party and then they went nowhere. Isayama seemed to make it a point that those who supported alternatives were seen as fickle, indecisive, and weak compared to people like Floch and Eren.
It also doesn’t help that the only major alternative proposed, the 50 year plan, was never an actual plan because it was proposed by a guy who was later revealed to want the extinction of Eldians. Making the plan a farse.
I think the biggest thing that confused/upset me was in 123 at that conference that Eren walked out of. That character seemed to exist to yet again remind us and Eren that there is no such thing as peace.
So maybe its a cautionary tale but honestly it feels more like Isayama is constantly justifying Eren. The text of the manga supports Eren’s side far more than it does the other side, which makes arguing about it when you aren’t on Eren’s side incredibly difficult. Which might be the point but I hesitate to give Isayama credit for that.
Again those are not my words but I share the concern. Thank you @kingsgrave for permission to share them. Also thank you (and sorry) to everyone in my inbox. I hope be discussing the series soon.