People who had kids on purpose really will come home from work after the worst day ever like "there better not be any fucking kids in here."

Jimmy Eat World

PR's Tumblrdome
macklin celebrini has autism
Game of Thrones Daily
Mike Driver
d e v o n
cherry valley forever

Kiana Khansmith
tumblr dot com
Cosimo Galluzzi
untitled
KIROKAZE
Cookie Run:Kingdom Official!

gracie abrams

titsay
Fieri Frames
Fai_Ryy

No title available

Love Begins
Today's Document

seen from Ecuador

seen from United States
seen from Morocco

seen from United States
seen from Iraq
seen from United States

seen from Brazil
seen from Angola

seen from Türkiye
seen from Venezuela

seen from Türkiye

seen from United States

seen from Ireland
seen from Brazil
seen from Panama

seen from Austria
seen from Spain
seen from Brazil
seen from Türkiye
seen from Malaysia
@shyygirl
People who had kids on purpose really will come home from work after the worst day ever like "there better not be any fucking kids in here."
your problem is you think if you communicate with clarity and earnestness that people will actually understand you
Lil Nas X gives a life update.
Why is t being vegetarian enough?
First off, I want to quality by saying that between being a meat eater and a vegetarian, a vegetarian is massively better by just about every metric. It’s more sustainable, it causes less harm to animals and at least represents a conscious decision to try and do better. That is unequivocally a positive thing and should be recognised as such. I’ve absolutely no interest in the ‘vegans vs vegetarians’ thing because it’s completely unhelpful.
When we’re talking about someone who makes an ethical decision to go vegetarian instead of vegan though, there is really no good ethical argument for that. There are practical justifications, I don’t want to give up cheese, I’d find it too hard to get enough calories, I have a restrictive diet already etc. but these aren’t ethical arguments. There is really no way to maintain a consistent ethical position that involves boycotting beef but not dairy and leather, for example, since they’re practically the same industry built on the same exploitation.
The issue is that if you oppose animal exploitation or killing animals for food, vegetarianism directly funds both of those things. Calves taken from their mothers and killed by the dairy industry, their mothers killed and sold for meat or pet food when their profitability declines, lambs killed for meat every year as part of the wool industry , male chicks ground up alive and hens slaughtered once they’re spent as part of egg production. There is just no rational way to justify objecting to killing an animal for food while also being fine with exploiting and then killing those same animals a bit later on for different food.
Vegetarians are making a positive decision and I encourage that, what I’d discourage is stopping your journey there. Once you are comfortable with meat-free meals, take a look into the egg industry and ask yourself if this goes against your existing values. If it does, try swapping out eggs and see how you feel. When you’re comfortable with that, look into the dairy in industry and how inextricably linked it is to both beef and veal production. Try a few plant-based milks and see what you like. I promise you won’t struggle to give up cheese as much as you think you will, and if you do, just have a plant-based diet except for cheese, then see how you feel about that in a month or two. You don’t need to do everything all at once.
Just take it one step at a time, if you’ve managed to go vegetarian then that is genuinely great, and you should feel proud of that. But now you’ve got that down, it may be time to look at how you can do more to live your values through what you put on your plate, what you buy and what you wear. You’re already half way there, and my inbox is always open for advice.
*reading philosophy* hmm well it depends
A German regional court has ruled that Google is directly liable for the content of its AI search overviews. According to the court, previou
Let’s fucking go
This is HUGE.
1. The court holds Google responsible for statements made by its AI, considering them Google's statements (search engines have limited liability for results in their engine as they're the words of other sites/companies/people), meaning when their AI lies/hallucinates they're liable for the defamation/harm resulting from those statements.
2. Google's defense that customers are generally aware of the lack of reliability and are responsible for fact checking was dismissed. As the court pointed out, that would "significantly diminish" AI Search's stated purpose and it can't be distinguished from Google's business practices/statements as a search tool.
3. Studies have found about 91% of Google's everyday AI responses are accurate, leaving millions of searches per HOUR with potential liability for falsehoods. 56% of correct responses weren't supported by the sources the AI listed. Both of which mean Google is now liable for a LOT more AI "errors."
4. Google was held liable for 80% of court costs in this case and this precedent is expected to reverberate around the world. This is a massive shift from the 3rd-party search provider role Google has previously played and it comes right as they've tied ALL searches to their AI search.
TL;DR Google reeeeeally stepped in it this time.
Additional source and more details below. Absolutely thrilled to say that this is real. And yeah, it's huge.
For all the reasons above AND ALSO because this particular lawsuit is a defamation case
Privacy lawsuits are hard because most privacy laws are super super weak, and there's very rarely a lot of money or enforcement backing privacy laws for...twenty million reasons, really...
But defamation suits? Those have teeth.
(In large part because, at least in some countries and including in the US, defamation laws protect public figures the least - and "public figures" legally includes most if not all politicians, and a hell of a lot of other rich ppl too)
A Munich court ruled Google's AI Overviews are its own words, making it liable for false claims, a decision that, if it holds, could reach e
A German court has ruled that Google can be held directly liable for false claims made by its AI Overviews, a decision that could put a serious legal dent in the whole “the AI made me do it” defense. According to The Next Web, the Regional Court of Munich issued a temporary injunction after Google’s AI Overviews wrongly tied two Munich publishers to scams, subscription traps, and dubious business practices. The court treated those AI-generated summaries as Google’s own statements, not just ordinary search results pointing to third-party pages. That distinction matters. Search engines have traditionally had more protection because they index and link to other people’s content. AI Overviews changes the machinery. Google is not just showing the web anymore. It is summarizing it, rewriting it, and sometimes apparently hallucinating a tiny legal grenade into the results page... This is still a preliminary injunction, not a final ruling, and Google can appeal. But for publishers, brands, SEOs, and anyone watching AI search swallow the results page, the message is clear: if Google wants to be the answer engine, courts may start treating it like the publisher of those answers.
-via Search Engine World, June 10, 2026. Emphasis mine.
You know your drunk art post about love and personhood from 2019? Every night at bedtime my late cat would lie on my chest, and her little heartbeat would be right on top of mine, and I'd think about that piece of art you made, and have a similar sort of image in my head. Anyway, yesterday I finally put the image to paper, and idk where this is going, just that that piece of art you created means a lot to me. Have a cool day ✌️
OHHHH MY GOD!!!!! EVERYBODY SHUT THE FUCK UP AND LOOK AT THIS. ITS ALL BEEN WORTH IT
This sick bleach shirt I made. Something to showcase my undying love for prehistoric cave art.
Some of the bleach burned thru the shirt bc this was my first time bleaching anything ever, but it kinda adds to it.
Salam Akil
Didn't realize they made emergency thermal blankets for babies
It's scary to think about babies in an emergency but I guess it's a crazy world out there
Emergency baby
[Francisco de Goya]
SOUND ON.
embodying tchaikovsky every time someone ignores my text
HATE when an american has an obviously slavic last name and i have to try and force my brain to pronounce it americanly. like who the hell is dejvid surny. vole to je david černý. s nim jsem chodila do školy
Didn't realize they made emergency thermal blankets for babies
It's scary to think about babies in an emergency but I guess it's a crazy world out there
Emergency baby
[Francisco de Goya]
Art from mx_scratch_ on IG
i support universal free healthcare for one simple reason: if you are diagnosed with a terminal illness you should quit your job. quitting your job is the correct response to terminal illness. but you can’t do that if your healthcare is tied to your job
listen if somebody knows that they will be dead in a years time, and you are forcing them to continue to come into work, that’s fucked up. terminally ill people should be able to quit their jobs and live their last few months to the fullest. i don’t get how that’s a controversial opinion
Shout out to the clover, the dandelion and the daisy. The triumvirate of springtime childish whimsy. WHO is doing it like them