Sprop

Owo glomps you

[slorpadorp]

This is my discourse blog ig

Call me Slorpadorp or Slorp for short. He/him. If you’re going to be rude, just know I block freely. You won’t be getting any engagement

[lonelydesolate]

oh look! something approaching actual thoughtful analysis on anti-transmasculinity from a popular transfeminist. i wonder if -

oh okay. oppression specific to trans men can manifest sometimes as them being thought of as childish deluded unserious and in need of correction. ANYWAY here's why these loony whiny corny stupid liberal tboys dont know what theyre talking about and need me to give them a Real Term to talk about their own oppression.

[therapatical]

fun reminder that tara was the main one who came up with a nickname to mock me for being a victim of SA. and then spread it to her friends. and all her friends kept calling me that nickname containing the word "rape" as a play on words for my username. to literally make fun of me for being a victim. and when confronted on this, she basically refused to confirm nor deny it but instead misgendered me in her response. :)

[therapatical]

side note, when people like this do the first screenshot (exhibiting that they fully understand transmasc issues with no problem), I think we need to start taking that as evidence that these people know what they're doing. stop giving her--and everyone else doing the same thing--benefit of the doubt.

"she's so close! she's right there! why doesn't she understand!" she does, though. she just demonstrated to you that she understands it fully. she doesn't care. she wants to be fucking evil and transphobic about it all. she wants the dopamine hit of telling internet strangers that she's better than them and superior to them. all of these assholes who act like this are the same way. stop assuming they're misunderstanding everything. when they demonstrate that they know what other people deal with, and then pivot hard to all the little radfem games they wanna play, that is an admission that the whole thing is a grifty farce.

she knows what she's doing. she is exactly as cruel as you think that would carry you to conclude based on those actions. she is not mistaken or misinformed, she is deliberately cruel and a bad fucking person. she enjoys seeing the way people fall for her bullshit and she enjoys other people's suffering. that's why she made an AI generated FBI photo and spread it online, knowing it would scare a bunch of other trans people shitless. she wants attention, good or bad, and doesn't care who gets hurt in the process.

stop assuming bigoted people are lacking agency in their bigotry. stop infantilizing radfems. for one, that's kinda misogynistic in and of itself. but ik many of us want to assume the best in people, and don't want to face the reality that some of these online figures are flat out evil. stop trying to inadvertently defend these people when they could not give a rat's ass whether you lived or died. trolls know what they're doing and they enjoy doing it.

[learn-how-to-love]

“Is my behavior towards another minority group so unpalatable that it makes other people in my community uncomfortable with being around me? No, it must be the evil tboy’s fault for fooling them into standing in solidarity” womp womp honestly

[learn-how-to-love]

There’s some really interesting context clues here that make OP look even worse than she already did (genuinely this post is such a massive self own it’s almost comical) that anyone who isn’t a similarly brain poisoned bigot is going to pick up on. Like,

“There were no trans men in the group where this occurred” why were there no trans men in your group of IRL trans friends? Were there just none around or did you make them feel so uncomfortable they didn’t want to hang around you?

“What caused this was me complaining about the lack of trans women in Pride advertising” I mean if that’s true that would be a pretty extreme overreaction but given how you talk about trans men on the internet I honestly don’t believe you, sorry. Like maybe you really do think that’s the reason why but tbh that just says to me that your bigotry towards trans men is at such a level that you don’t even realize when you’re being cruel to them, which is supported by the rest of this post. Obviously I don’t know your situation but given my experiences with irl trans groups at the very least this incident was the last straw in a pattern of behavior.

“These [trans] men don’t even have to be in the room for me to be considered a threat to them” I mean, yeah? Are you confused by the concept of bigotry still being bad even if you’re not talking directly to that group? Genuinely a nonsensical thing to bring up.

“Concerning myself with the wellbeing of transmascs is a tar pit” I think you have it backwards, considering you’re saying in this post that not concerning yourself with the wellbeing of transmascs got you ousted by a group that does. It sounds more like your worldview is the tar pit that people don’t want to be involved with, and maybe if you tried to change people would help pull you out of it.

“This is not the only time this has happened” So you’re saying that you’ve been through this multiple times and think “surely it’s everyone else who is wrong”? Like girl I’m sorry but that’s completely on you.

“Supposed hatred of trans men” then two sentences later “AFAB when convenient men” flows out of your mouth like air. Yeah, I think we know why people think that about you!

[this-is-transandrophobia]

“Actually trans women saying they hate trans men is fine because they’re both from the same marginalized group!!!!” Actually as an Asian man I’d be upset if Asian women said they hated Asian men. Actually a disabled man I’d be upset if disabled women said they hated disabled men. Why are you spreading hate within the community you should have solidarity with

This is transandrophobia

[ridafi14]

Since the ISFF clone mob has buried a lot of the evidence of exactly what she said and why people are mad about it under a mountain of tag spam, here's a recap, entirely with posts that I remember seeing myself on her blogs.

Here's a fine selection of the kinds of people she was reblogging from during her initial round of pedo apologism. Namely, pro contact pedophiles who *coincidentally* think its pretty fashy for kids to not be allowed to fuck them. Like, this is indefensible on its own. No matter how much she tried to pretty it up or claim she *really* only meant non-contact pedophiles, her digital footprint doesn't corroborate that. Theres a difference between trying to argue that pedophile doesn't *necessarily* equal sex offender, and trying to completely decouple the pedophilia from CSA.

Not to mention the whole history of NAMBLA and similar pedophile groups trying to co opt the queer rights movement as a way to claim legitimacy, but that could be its own entire post.

Here we have her after deleting Suggestrogen and remaking as Isuggestgirl, claiming that she isn't a fetish blog. In the same day she posted diaper porn and forcefem hypno scripts. Not to mention, you know, her entire deal being forcefem. No responsible kinkster, especially with a focus on consensual-non-consent kinks would lie like this. It takes the consenting part away, and suddenly you're just engaging in your kink with people who haven't given informed consent. It's predatory and it's wrong, and given her refusal to tag her kink posts or mark her blog as 18+, it paints a nasty picture in conjunction with the pedo apologia.

Oh yeah, and that time she was just real weird and gross about little alters. She tries to cover for it by saying it was a riff on the meme but, like, nothing about the "with mama" meme indicates pedophilic incest. That was all ISFF original. She can never admit to a joke being poorly considered or to making a mistake. She will only ever either double down on it, or try to hide that it ever existed (such as by deleting an entire blog because not as many people bought into the call for pedo defense as she thought)

Cherry on top, she's a transphobe. She just is. Characterizing all trans men as harassers who hurt transfems is just a plainly transphobic thing to do. It's unfair, untrue, and divisive. Gender essentialism doesn't suddenly become good because you make it trans inclusive. It will only ever harm the trans community.

[i-suggest-maiming-pedophiles]

No because like. ISFF has been going down a weird pipeline

Forcefem/force[gender] in general: Perfectly fine but. Y'know. It's a kink that needs to be consensual between all parties, else it's low-key sexual harassment.

Forceplural: What a weird way to say RAMCOA. Like, there is no ethical way to force someone to get new headmates. Emphasis on force, specifically. And by now we've already gotten into "pretending this isn't a kink" territory, so I'm taking this at face value and saying this is fucking dangerous.

Forcedisability: Depends on the disability but only semantically (mainly just because the previous and next points are both about disabilities/disability symptoms). But forcing someone to lose their mobility to some degree, or shorten their life expectancy, or fuck with their mental state, or make processing information more difficult, or be stuck unable to do anything independently for God knows how long... why would you force that on someone? ISFF is disabled herself-- why wouldn't she understand that being disabled sucks* and that forcing it on someone would suck harder?

*I don't say this to discount disability positivity, obviously. That's extremely important to do. But as someone with multiple chronic symptoms and a lot of neurodivergent and/or persodivergent traits, I wouldn't force my quality of life (especially as a poor person with all these issues) on anyone.

Force[schizophrenia]: Not possible from what I understand, albeit you could hypothetically force someone into psychosis in general, which... WHY THE FUCK WOULD YOU??? We're not schizophrenic, but we've had bad really delusional episodes before, and if someone forced me to go through those again I would FLIP THE FUCK OUT.

[i-suggest-maiming-pedophiles]

MAYBE DON'T LEAVE THIS IN THE TAGS PREV BECAUSE. WHAT. WHAT THE FUCK.

(If anyone has screenshots I'd appreciate it but genuinely what the hell)

[the-voiddemon]

My bad. Here

[transparency-bias]

hi! another schizophrenic here! this is exactly what i mean when ppl who make jokes where the butt of the joke is being schizophrenic are actively hostile/violent to schizophrenic ppl.

i would never ever in a million years wish even my worst enemies to go thru the psychotic episodes ive gone thru. i have never seen another schizophrenic person wish someone else was schizophrenic either, unless it was so that they could understand just how fucking horrible it is suffering thru hallucinations and delusions. actually, if she'd listen to schizophrenic ppl, she'd hear us complaining about how ppl don't take delusions/schizophrenia seriously at all, she'd know that schizo is a slur, and that we want ppl to stop making 'jokes' at our fucking expense bc that's how we die. ppl don't take us seriously bc our delusions are downplayed, and we die/are killed for it.

and then comparing it all to cracking eggs is infuriating. being trans is not remotely similar to being schizophrenic. at ALL. delusions are ACTIVELY HARMFUL. ALL OF THEM. even the 'good' ones ive had were not good for me in the long run! being trans is not a delusion, and idk why anyone would wanna compare the two when that sanist, transphobic rhetoric is used to hurt trans and psychotic ppl!

don't pretend like u support us or are even an ally to us if u do shit that causes us to wind up dead, end of discussion.

[isuggesttakingestrogen]

And the background post is . This . Y’know I really doubt that claim you’re making there I think you might be lying to make the giant archive of everything you’ve done wrong- the one that doesn’t respond to stuff so it can’t defend itself- look bad so that people feel sympathy for a false claim you’re making instead of looking at the actual evidence

[strawberrycheesecakehare]

Isuggestforcefem stop sexualizing mental and physical disabilities especially when people with those disabilities tell you not to challenge

[celestialgluttony]

I noticed nobody mentioning this Quite Weird post she reblogged so here it is for the archive + tags

[discoursedamaged]

this is a fucking wild thing to say. in a post #metoo world, as a supposed feminist, how do you not know at least some of the answers to your questions? This is a self report that you have no business speaking on the things you're speaking on.

Every rape case anyone's ever heard of is full of consideration for the assaulter's point of view, the assaulter's future, the possibility that something was just misunderstood. Nothing but nuance and ambiguity, and what were you wearing, and did you scream loud enough, and are you sure you didn't give off the impression that you wanted it, and are you sure you didn't just change your mind later, and and and.

Rape is considered worse than assault for two main reasons: motive and effect. There are good reasons to punch someone in the face. There is no good reason to rape someone. Rape also has severe psychological effects on the victim, not to mention the possibility of stds or impregnation. It is baffling to have to explain this to someone purporting to be any kind of feminist. And I would argue, rape is a physical act. It has consequences directly on the body, just as any other kind of assault, but with the sexual element on top of it. So it stands to reason that it would by default be worse.

There are cases where the idea of rape, "the specter of the rapist", if you prefer, is used maliciously. The racist fearmongering about minorities, for instance, or advocating for higher control of women under the guise of protection from rape. These are also feminist conversations. It says something about your contact with feminist thought if you think no one else is discussing this.

Lastly. This is the group that has shrugged off the potential suicide of a trans woman who was being directly encouraged to kill herself. "Bite the curb" is just fine to say to a trans woman, but "kill all rapists" is somehow over the line. And in the ever-changing borders of their conception of freedom of speech, why is an online blogger, someone who could be a victim themself, saying "kill all rapists" so scary? why are you clutching your pearls over words on a screen, in the same paragraph where you advocate for more leniency towards sexual assault?

[k1ttybr41nz]

trying not to reblog much discourse stuff like this but i rly wanna highlight the part where the rapist's side is always considered. like every single discussion ab this where someone is advocating for leniency and forgiveness towards predators is just completely detached from the actual reality where rape and assault are NOT seriously punished transgressions, where rapists ARE actually listened to and sympathized with. like its truly just such a slap in the face to every victim who lost friends and community after coming forward about their experience with a person who has never faced and will never face any real consequences to pretend that rapists and predators are a demographic desperately in need of protection. the very few cases you see where someone murders a rapist, whether it was their own or someone else's? that is a MINISCULE number compared to the number of rapists who wont see so much as a slap on the wrist. you simply cannot make me give a shit about someone saying "kill all rapists" when theres literally never any action followed by that. youre not gonna convince me that this is a real fucking problem, because its not. and if you try to act like it is, im going to assume that you did something that you knew was wrong and youre scared of ever facing any consequences for

[learn-how-to-love]

“Is my behavior towards another minority group so unpalatable that it makes other people in my community uncomfortable with being around me? No, it must be the evil tboy’s fault for fooling them into standing in solidarity” womp womp honestly

[ridafi14]

"All i did was ask for more transfem rep, honest!" *Spends 3 paragraphs whining about how inherently evil and selfish trans men are, literally calls "concern for their emotional wellbeing" a tarpit*

[i-suggest-maiming-pedophiles]

If she's dead then I hope all of y'all shut the fuck up forever at this point. If the fact that you're all obsessed with suicide baiting people wasn't enough, then maybe the fact that someone is most likely dead will change your minds. Your lives, even.

And I doubt you're gonna see this, but hey, ISFF? This is the stuff your defenders like to get up to. The absolute least you could do is denounce this. Denounce the fact that your fanbase is willing to kill somebody (multiple people, actually, this is just the only likely success) over disagreeing with you.

[what-if-a-dog]

If i wanted to listen to a white woman who jumps through hoops to protect pedophiles, speaks in passive agressive riddles and has a weird pathologically insecure hatred for trans men talk, id unblock my mother

[panicatthecriscodisco]

I absolutely don’t have anything against forcefem and understand why so many trans women are into it/attached to it but my problem is absolutely how people seem to forget that it’s a kink and will say/do inappropriate things due to that (making jokes towards newly out trans women that aren’t okay with that, say it about children in a way that makes it clear they forgot that forcefem is a kink, etc)

The kink itself is fine as long as it’s being engaged with and discussed AS A KINK

REAL!!! i have said this before (and ngl i myself am into forcemasc but that's a whole can of worms this blog is not for) but kinks are NOT for everyone!!!! and kinks are especially not political praxis!!!! you are not more woke than anyone else for getting your jollies out of having your gender identity validated through sexual play and under no circumstances should you treat sexual play as integral to your identity???? i'm a very sexual person but i regard my sexuality and tastes as a Facet of myself that i share w people who consent to it and not the Whole of my being yk? like if you cannot meaningfully separate sexual gratification from othernaspects of your life you are going to miss out on so much and make so many people feel you're unpleasant if not outright unsafe to interact with because you can't take shit serious unless it gets you off and i don't know why more people can't understand n accept that

[wokerevolverocelot]

Hey, so did u know that if you intentionally dont label your kink content under the appropriate content label, like isff did, content filters become useless??? Victim blaming ass mentality

From @/thecomplainerrr, clown who appeared in the notes of my "they not like us" isff joke post. Very big supporter of isff, block them

[slorpadorp]

Not to mention that she wasn’t just simply on tumblr minding her own business. She was actively suggesting her kink to people. You didn’t consent to strangers telling you to do something that turns them on by being on a website

[sacred-pro-fiction]

Im so tired of noncon fantasies being defended exclusively from the standpoint of women who fantasize as the victim

"Accusing ppl with rape fantasies of wanting to be raped is disgusting apologism!"

I fantasize as the rapist. I like imagining scenarios where someone isn't attracted to me, because I'm used to being treated as an object and it pisses me off. The only fantasy that feels empowering is one where I'm 100% sure the other person isn't using me for their pleasure because they aren't experiencing pleasure at all, because I'm in control, because it's all about what I want and nothing else.

That doesn't make me a rapist, and most of the people condemning rape fantasies have people like me in mind, so it would be nice if that was acknowledged more.

[callahan----callahan-again]

wow the blog that took the "i suggest" gimmick (famously being one that applies itself to many different posts without pretense) and made it a kink thing while also doing the typical i suggest format and not being just a kink blog turned out to be all for proud pedophiles on tumblr (famously people who want to have sexual activity with a party that cannot consent(proud part, not inherently pedophilic disorder/paraphilic disorder part)). who wouldve guessed.

[i-suggest-maiming-pedophiles]

Keep Emmett Till's name out of your goddamn mouths. Fucking jackasses.

Even if she was innocent (she's not, but I know y'all pretend she is, so even if she was), do you really think someone losing their social media is equivalent to be brutally murdered and disfigured? Because it isn't. It really fucking isn't.

Grow the fuck up and learn about real life lynching before you compare a teenage victim of Jim Crow to a white woman losing a fucking Tumblr blog.