𝖘𝖒𝖊𝖊𝖋𝖎𝖓𝖌𝖙𝖔𝖓 @smeefington - Tumblr Blog

art for my beautiful and beloved scrongel...

kianamaiart

real life college losers

akashicrecord

Affirmations:

- I do not feel well and I am probably going to die

- I am sick and dying

- Girl it is Thursday

segamascott

parachim

inat's email game is wild

a-very-cute-snake

I get notifications from the US Geological Survey because I do geography stuff and they'll be like "volcano may explode in [area]" and I'm like "oh. okay."

sunshineface

Wind Farm 12”x12” acrylic on canvas

#BEAUTIFUL ANIMALS!!!!!!!!!!

punkitt-is-here

so I had an interesting time yesterday

punkitt-is-here

me and the bad bitches i pulled by being autistic

trashcangimmick

ace-disgrace-on-the-case

I think “gamers” don’t deserve Early Access, tbh

ace-disgrace-on-the-case

Is early access an excuse to release an unfinished product sometimes? Yea, for sure

But like. Functionally it serves as a way for live experience testing to be done on a game. It’s a way to dial it in on what people want, and on how to best make the game.

This means that, stars above, you don’t need to fucking review bomb it the second there’s a problem, you have avenues for giving feedback, stop saying the game is doomed because there’s been one bad update ffs

This brought to you by the embarassing state of people talking about both Slay the Spire 2 and Deep Rock Galactic: Rogue Core

im-a-luxury--few-can-afford

the average person's opinion can now reach media Creators with unprecedented ease and holy fuck does the average person have terrible game dev opinions

fleshengine

hang on where's the

sztupy

A German regional court has ruled that Google is directly liable for the content of its AI search overviews. According to the court, previou

ayeforscotland

Let’s fucking go

made-in-manetheren

This is HUGE.

1. The court holds Google responsible for statements made by its AI, considering them Google's statements (search engines have limited liability for results in their engine as they're the words of other sites/companies/people), meaning when their AI lies/hallucinates they're liable for the defamation/harm resulting from those statements.

2. Google's defense that customers are generally aware of the lack of reliability and are responsible for fact checking was dismissed. As the court pointed out, that would "significantly diminish" AI Search's stated purpose and it can't be distinguished from Google's business practices/statements as a search tool.

3. Studies have found about 91% of Google's everyday AI responses are accurate, leaving millions of searches per HOUR with potential liability for falsehoods. 56% of correct responses weren't supported by the sources the AI listed. Both of which mean Google is now liable for a LOT more AI "errors."

4. Google was held liable for 80% of court costs in this case and this precedent is expected to reverberate around the world. This is a massive shift from the 3rd-party search provider role Google has previously played and it comes right as they've tied ALL searches to their AI search.

TL;DR Google reeeeeally stepped in it this time.