Just another Tumblr account

this really really negative/annoying guy | reblogs mostly | my english is hardly B2

[3m0g1rlyyy]

i genuinely want to relapse so bad like it’s not even funny.

[so-fucking-valid-uwu]

🥰✨🐬🧚‍♀️when you’re finally in active addiction ✨🐬🥰🧚‍♀️

[iceyrukia]

the whole commenting that men do when talking about a foreign country is annoying : “ their women are beautiful” “ x country has the most beautiful women in the world”.

Like all of this might seem innocent and lighthearted at the surface but it really shows that men see women as tourists attractions and objects/resources that belong to a nation ( another group of men). They’ll list all these defining cultural aspects of a country and places for sightseeing and then BOOM, the inevitable “ beautiful women” comment because they can’t restrain themselves from reminding everyone and themselves that women are meant to be LOOKED at.

And then you’ll see the casual debates and compliments that men have with each other over women that’s extremely nauseating. The entitlement that men have in thinking that women first and foremost for their own gratification makes me see red I’m sick and tired of men.

[so-fucking-valid-uwu]

wtf is going on. my only friend has been dating my biggest enemy (the word's too strong but that's how I feel) for 10 months. and I found out about it just now. like what the fuck, really, what the fuck. I have such mixed feelings. the dude talked the worst shit about me, tried to bully me and triggered my dysphoria, and now he and my friend are dating.

I'm shocked, angered, crushed and humiliated at the same time.

I thought about it a little bit, and now... I fucking understood what angered me. WHY IS SHE CHOOSING SOME DUDE WHO BELITTLED HER FRIEND AND SAID THE MOST BRUTAL FUCKIBG SHIT ABOUT THEM, OVER ME? why the fuck does she think it's okay to just talk to that person - let alone dating???? not gonna mention that he's an edgy wannabe nazi who watches loli hentai. I'm disgusted.

[so-fucking-valid-uwu]

update, several years later; THAT DUDE IS DEAD HAHAHA yay!!

[cheermeupthankyou]

#when insecurity kicks in hard

[so-fucking-valid-uwu]

I've seen more violence than I've seen body hair on women.

and this is not okay

[cheeseanonioncrisps]

You know what sex ed lessons for girls really need to do more on?

Body hair.

Like, from what I remember, we pretty much just got told as part of our puberty lessons that we were going to start growing hair on our armpits and pubic area and then it was on to the periods and breasts— because it’s not like there’s anything else to talk say about hair, right?

Things they didn’t cover:

You are going to have to shave your legs and armpits regularly from the age of about 11 until the age of about seventeen when you are finally allowed to drop PE.

If you don’t, all the girls in your PE class will tell you you are too hairy and ask you when you last shaved.

If you tell your Mum you want to start shaving your armpits, she will give you a razor and show you how to do it. If you then attempt to shave your legs as well, you will immediately stab yourself in the leg because you have no idea what you are doing. Your parents will come running when they hear you screaming about all the blood on the bathroom floor.

(Shower water dilutes blood, making it look like there’s way more than there is. You are fine.)

When you go swimming in the Summer holidays aged 13, your 11 year old little brother will feel entitled to tell you you need to shave your armpits.

We lied to you about how much hair you’re going to grow. Armpits and legs and privates are just the start.

Some girls get unibrows, some girls get moustaches, some girls get stray hairs on their breasts or chins. A lot of girls get hair on their stomachs or backs— if you’ve got dark hair, you might end up with noticeably hairy arms.

No matter what configuration of hair you’ve got on your body, society will treat you like a freak who needs to either shave or go live in the woods with the other animals— because at some point we all just decided that all women are naturally hairless except for their heads, eyebrows and eyelashes, and now you better damn well jump to meet that standard.

If you don’t want to shave, you may find yourself covering up instead, wearing clothes that are really too warm for the weather because the alternative is letting people see your body.

Body hair is perfectly natural, but the whole world is going to tell you it isn’t.

[areyoutheregoditsmekatherine]

ask yourself: how often do i see women with hairy legs? hairy underarms? how often do i see being hairy used as a negative quality or as an insult against a woman? how about as an accusation of being unhygienic? unkempt? unsexy? how was shaving brought up to me as a child? how did i feel about it the first time my legs were completely bare? did i feel more mature? more acceptable? how do i feel when i don't shave my legs? unclean? embarrassed? do i wear the same clothes i otherwise would have worn? do i apologize for it if i do? do i know what my legs feel like with the stubble grown out?

[liberatewomyn-blog]

it makes me sad to see girls out here who are having a lot of shitty (as in, their partners are just generally bad in bed) sex and who feel like they have to try so hard to justify it because they truly just don’t know better.

like, i was talking to a girl yesterday who tried to tell me that “the goal of sex is to make a man orgasm”, when really what she meant was “i’ve never been with a partner who has made me orgasm because we always just focus on him”.

i’ve also heard “but you can have good sex without orgasms!” which, yes, true, but what they always mean is “my partner always orgasms but i never do”.

“women’s bodies just don’t work like that!” or “but it’s so much harder for women to orgasm!” vs “the man/men i’m with don’t put in effort or reciprocate during sex”;

“well, i can orgasm on my own but it doesn’t happen for me during sex for some reason” vs. “the guy i’m with has no idea what a clit is and doesn’t understand or attempt to understand how my body works”;

“but i mean, sex is for men, so it’s not gonna be that great for me” vs. “i don’t know that sex can be good for women too because i’ve only been with selfish men and only been taught to cater to them”;

“okay but like, getting oral is weird? i’ll give it, but…” vs. “the society i was raised in causes me to think that i need to give without receiving, and that a man’s pleasure is more important than mine”

the list goes on, really, and it makes me so sad for women and so mad at men & the sexual society that’s been created to make women think that bad sex is so normal and on top of that, the best they can get.

women deserve better.

[captainsamcarter-deactivated202]

Feminism is all fun and games till it actually comes to support females only then it’s misandry:( hurts the mens feelwings:( shut the fuck up

[moved-amphibifem]

Last night I was thinking about feminism has been so watered down to the point where “girl power!” and choice feminism is cheered for in liberal spaces that that’s kinda of what everyone thinks feminism is now. Does that make sense?

Companies are pumping out t-shirts that say “FEMINIST” and girls are posting nudes on Instagram in the name of feminism but if you want to take it one step further and say “hey I’d like to learn about the history of feminism” or “hey I’d like to read some feminist literature” or shit, you even want to talk about reproductive rights, you’re getting into “TERF” territory.

Participating in serious, productive feminism isn’t cute and fun anymore. Once you step past “girl power!!!” into “woman power” or god forbid “female power” you’re not a fun feminist anymore. You’re a mean manhating terf. They’ll even claim you aren’t a feminist. My peers are so confident in their definition of feminism that isn’t accurate.

#1 example I can come up with right now: the biggest feminist protest in recent American history was called transphobic and terfy because of vulva imagery and pink pussy hats.

[orangelemonart]

lets talk about how the gender neutral wardrobe is boyish clothes because feminine clothes aren’t considered neutral

[smallgayworld-blog]

and it’s totally connected with the idea that men are the default

[genderqueergiraffe]

^^^^^^^

[radmenace]

i agree with this but also it’s worth mentioning that the clothes marketed to men tend to be plain and comfortable while clothes marketed to women are gaudy, uncomfortable, embellished, have cutouts or reveal skin, etc. theyre not neutral. people think men = male gender roles so when they see that clothes marketed to men are the “neutral” they interpret that as men are neutral… but actually their clothes are neutral! the fact that clothes marketed to women arent neutral is part of the process of othering women through gender roles.

[lap0esie-deactivated20200712]

Men look ridiculous in women’s clothes because women’s clothes are ridiculous

[trichsters-point-of-view]

Having to hide ur ‘real’ physical self 24/7 is so exhausting like I can’t imagine how people wake up in the morning without getting anxious about it

[so-fucking-valid-uwu]

I invented a whole system on how to hold my phone when I’m on it, how to give money to a cashier when I buy smth, how to pass something to my classmates when they ask me to, how to keep my hands when I walk and when I sit, how to gesture so my nails aren’t visible, how to… do anything, actually.

I have to constantly think of a dialogue that I could have if someone will confront me about my nails, have to think of a proper reaction that wouldn’t make me look weird or extremely insecure.

And I feel so free when it’s winter. I can wear gloves and be confident…

[so-fucking-valid-uwu]

Jesus Christ look at this perfect English. when did I become as dumb as I am right now?

[whistlenotes]

[theocseason4]

this is the best news ever

[cyberghoul-deactivated20200921]

[radgoblin]

How refreshing is it that she’s not 22?

[jennifercheckdidnothingwrong]

keanu reeves continues to prove why he’s the only trustworthy man in hollywood

[riverroan]

Why can’t boys hit girls back if it’s in self defense?

[radfem-moira]

It’s fine to defend yourself, but you gotta ask yourself what kind of retaliation is justified. Cause men tend to go overboard in these situations. If she slapped you, the correct response isn’t to drop-kick her, put her in a choke hold, break some bones, etc.

[ms-hells-bells]

males are almost always stronger than women. they very rarely need to employ actual self defence because they can push us away, hold us down, or literally just run away (since they’re usually faster as well). the point of self defence is to prevent yourself from being injured and to remove yourself from the situation as soon as you can. when i woman slaps a man and he punches her back, that’s not self defence, that’s revenge.

men don’t want self defence, they want revenge. 

it is also, like moira said, rarely proportional. when a woman slaps or punches a man, while she shouldn’t, it leaves a scratch or bruise at the most. a single punch or slap in the face from a man can easily break multiple bones in a woman’s face, from the nose to the cheek to the jaw to the orbital bone. 90% of men are capable of killing us with their bare hands. it’s virtually impossible for women to do so. women and men are not the same physically and radfems acknowledge that.

there is also just the plain statistical facts that the vast majority of men who use force against women are doing it as a form of punishment, usually domestic violence, while most women who hit men did it in self defence. this is also reflected in partner murder. the facts are that boys DO hit girls already. violence against girls and women is rampant. the “boys shouldn’t hit girls” thing is a myth, a fallacy, men already beat tens of millions (perhaps ever hundreds of millions, looking at DV stats) of females. this is the current and historical truth. men have been beating women for thousands of years.

[anti-porn-unicorn]

[happibeans]

Performing for, appealing to, and and carrying out misogyny against women for men doesn’t make such men perceive perceive you as an equal.

It never will.

[to-be-deleted-soon-just-wait]

Transmedicalism Master List of Sources:

Scientific/Medical Research:

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]

Articles with their own sources:

[12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25]

Here is a Google Doc with a bunch of Transmedicalist Sources and Citations + Receipts:

[26]

[cruzfucker]

[mpregwizard-deactivated20260125]

bi and pan are very similar, but not entirely the same. the distinction i heard was that bi felt different attraction deoending in gender, and pan did not. i could absolutely be wrong on that, but either way, bi still includes trans people.

source: i am bi and genderfluid

[spectrumtwelve-deactivated20240]

bi is attraction to features that present as male or female typically together in a conventional way. pan is attraction towards any and all gender presenting features regardless of their owner or the combination of them.

[homosexual-means-gay]

it’s a sign you’re wrong when you have to redefine what bisexuality is to validate non-bisexuals. bisexuality is the attraction to both sexes. that’s it. bisexuals can have any preferences. some white westerners decided to use pansexual to advertise themselves as without gender preferences, but they’re still bi. pansexuality is a type of bisexual and that has always been true and even acknowledged by the queer theorists who coined pansexuality.