the broader feminist movement probably will not recognize that “sex work is work” was not intended to improve working conditions for trafficked women, but rather to reduce stigma and make it easier for sex buyers, until like the 2040s
This is so so so sick I actually want to throw up. By naming your daughter with something that is DIRECTLY associated with a porn star…isn’t that sexualizing your daughter since birth?!? Someone help I’m gonna drive up the walls
A) he watched so much porn he had a "favourite" porn star
B) his wife just went through labor and birth and he actively WANTED to piss her off in this vulnerable situation
C) he wanted to name his daughter after a porn star, meaning he just sees women as sex objects, EVEN HIS NEWBORN DAUGHTER. And everytime he says her name, he'll think of sex (absolutely disgusting)
D) he actually told his daughter about who she's named after, probably wanting to humiliate her and "put her in her place."
"The ruling-sex acts as the wasteful, destructive rulers of survival, while relying entirely on the labor of women to clean up, manage, and
"In the villages, coastal regions, and agricultural heartlands of the Third World, environmental collapse is the daily, agonizing, and physical destruction of life. As prolonged droughts turn fertile earth to dust, as erratic floods wash away entire generations of crops, and as rising sea levels poison the freshwater table with saltwater, the male class does not adapt by altering its consumption. This visceral breakdown is clear in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam, where rising sea levels push saltwater miles inland, permanently poisoning freshwater tables and destroying the rice paddies that local women rely on to feed their families (Dang et al., 2024). It is equally devastating across rural Pakistan, where catastrophic floods obliterate generational agrarian infrastructures, forcing families into desperate, climate-induced cycles of sex-based domestic violence and the forced marriage of young daughters (Haider, 2024). Global climate data confirms that these escalating eco-catastrophes do not cause the ruling class to alter their insatiable resource habits; instead, they shift the entire physical weight of this planetary crisis directly onto the shoulders of women (IPCC, 2023).
Women carry the burning burden of this environmental breakdown. Men designate women as the sole caretakers of life; they must walk miles each day across scorched terrain to find clean water. This concept is written directly onto the woman’s body—found in the permanent ache of her spine from carrying fifty-pound jerrycans under a blistering sun, the dust that coats her throat, and the raw blisters that score the soles of her feet. They must perform impossible domestic acrobatics to stretch diminishing food supplies to feed their children, often starving themselves so that others can eat. A woman’s stomach remains empty so that the patriarchal family unit can survive another day in the ruins. They care for the sick, the elderly, and the dying as climate-driven diseases spread and public infrastructure rots. As imperialist capital bleeds nature dry, the physical energy and labor required to sustain human life expands exponentially. The more the planet burns, the harder women must work just to keep their families from sliding into the grave. Yet, the male ruling class hoards and violently tightens their grip over wealth and resources through their domination of capital accumulation. Female labor performs the work that keeps the species alive, while men monopolize the authority that dictates the conditions of that survival. They have made women the shock absorbers of a burning world while they sit safely atop the wreckage."
"As the land dies and can no longer support agriculture or human habitation, displaced populations are forced to flee, migrating into border zones, urban slums, and crowded refugee camps. This material expulsion is accelerating across planetary frontlines like the Central American Dry Corridor, where multi-year droughts have collapsed subsistence farming, and the Lake Chad Basin, where rapid desertification has completely erased agrarian livelihoods, turning millions of farmers into climate refugees (UNEP, 2023). This mass displacement is a deliberate, engineered containment strategy. The phallocracy constructs these borders to serve as a cage, locking away the human victims of its own ecocidal destruction so that the centers of imperialist and colonial wealth accumulation remain undisturbed.
Within these camps and externalized border zones—such as the Western-funded militarized interception networks and informal containment points across North Africa—survival is fully militarized, bureaucratized, and weaponized. Armed guards, border officials, humanitarian directors, and police officers—architectures dominated entirely by men—control access to life itself. They hold food rations, life-saving medicine, basic shelter, and vital legal paperwork behind endless bureaucratic lines, checkpoints, and discretionary permit systems (Gerard & Pickering, 2014). A woman’s survival in these spaces is reduced to repeated, degrading, and dangerous encounters with male authority. Because men hold absolute, unchecked power over the bare necessities of life, compliance to them becomes the literal price of staying alive.
<...>
The conditions experienced by Palestinian women in Gaza vividly expose this relationship with particular severity. The targeted destruction of hospitals, water systems, sanitation infrastructure, and reproductive healthcare facilities has left thousands of women without access to prenatal care, contraception, menstrual hygiene products, or safe childbirth conditions (ActionAid International, 2024; UN ESCWA, 2024). Under these catastrophic conditions, severe shortages of sanitary products have forced many Palestinian women and girls to use torn fabric, old clothing, or even scraps of tents to manage menstruation under forced displacement—routinely stripped of reliable access to clean water, basic privacy, or adequate sanitation facilities (ActionAid International, 2024). The ecological destruction of Palestine demonstrates the convergence of militarized environmental devastation, imperialist-colonial violence, and patriarchal vulnerability. Access to clean water, healthcare, sanitation, electricity, and reproductive safety becomes politically controlled and weaponized through siege, occupation, and deliberate infrastructural destruction. This systematic devastation manifests as what feminist Sylvia Federici (2004) identifies as the ongoing, violent nature of capital accumulation: a structure where the formal economy only survives because the state externalizes the raw cost of physical survival onto the uncompensated, agonizing, and unwaged labor of women. The colonial war machine is not merely asserted through bombs and bullets, but through the deliberate, sadistic engineering of biological squalor. Women’s bodies ultimately absorb the brunt of imperialist warfare through the systematic denial of reproductive care, severe escalation in sexual violence, and acute physical illnesses born from exhaustion and deliberate malnutrition."
"The division is plain: our male relatives sat comfortably in the air-conditioned living room, while the women spent hours hidden away in the kitchen or the backyard, burning over the stove fire to accommodate them. The domestic hearth operates as an unmapped colony, a space where women are drained of their physical energy to maintain the leisure of their male relatives. Power chokes women from both sides in a coordinated, multi-layered vice. Men rule survival externally through “humanitarian” institutions and bourgeois states and their military forces, and internally within the family unit. Men govern the macro-structures of society and the micro-structures of the home, while women perform the exhausting, invisible, and uncompensated physical work necessary to keep humanity alive and society functioning. Across refugee camps and household walls, the logic of climate collapse is absolute and unchanging: men control the resources while women do the work to survive. The ruling-sex acts as the wasteful, destructive rulers of survival, while relying entirely on the labor of women to clean up, manage, and absorb the shockwaves of their destruction."
"Climate collapse cannot be solved through paperwork, international treaties, recycling campaigns, or polite liberal reforms. Those destroying the earth are the same forces that compound women’s subordination. Environmental destruction and the systematic exploitation of women are not separate issues; they are the twin engines of global imperialist extraction. The ruling-sex treats both the earth and the female body as infinite, disposable resources to be mined until exhaustion. They rape the soil and they rape the female body, driven by the same exact phallocratic entitlement that demands total mastery over all living things. We cannot save our earth without dismantling the structures of male domination that govern it.
To stop the ongoing murder of our planet, we must break their chokehold on survival itself. We must refuse to perform the unpaid labor that keeps their dying, ecocidal system running. We must dismantle the financial strangulation of the Third World by the First, the bourgeois boardrooms, and the phallocratic family unit that traps us in states of manufactured dependency. The survival of the earth requires a total, unyielding strike of the womb and the hand—the absolute refusal to make more toxic waste for women and children to sort, the absolute refusal to breed the next generation of exploiters and workers, and the absolute refusal to absorb the shocks of their violence. Our collective non-cooperation is the ultimate weapon, a sovereign reclamation of the future that will starve their global machinery of its fuel. The only path to a living world is the absolute destruction of male rule; to save our earth, we must reclaim ourselves."
I dislike the way that people dance around the oppression of women when it comes to conversations about history. Lots of people acknowledge that women were seen and treated as property, but the horror of that experience is rarely conveyed. When teaching about women's rolls in ancient cultures there is always that comment about women not being able to own property, that they were property themselves, and were expected to be submissive to men. But what does this actually look like?
It looks like rape. Like mothers being seperated from daughters. It looks like being forced to cohabit with and serve an owner who will force himself on you and breed you like stock. It is the sadness of miscarriage and the realisation that your body won't hold up. It's mutilation and violence. It's watching the deaths of your friends knowing that none of them lived a truly happy life. It's watching your daughter grow up knowing that she will be sold into servitude and raped until she dies, the same fate you face. In some cases you didn't even have a name.
Women's oppression is the oldest form of oppression, and yet we are still so strongly gripped by patriarchy that there is a refusal to acknowledge what that actually means. We have barely even started earning our rights in the west, and our sisters still face the terror of what I have described above. Women are always one step away from losing everything, and yet the movement meant to fight for women's liberation is being overun by men and misogynistic women. It's easier for them to uphold the status quo than challenge it.
Women need to learn their history, the grim and horrifying reality of it. The truth of our existence under patriarchy. If we don't seek out this truth, then history is doomed to repeat.
I dislike the way that people dance around men and boys oppression of girls and women when it comes to conversations about history. Lots of people acknowledge that men and boys see girls and women as property, but the horror of that experience is rarely conveyed. When teaching about girls and women's roles in ancient cultures there is always that comment about women not being able to own property, that men considered them and girls property themselves, and were expected to be submissive to men. But what does this actually look like?
It looks like men raping. Like mothers being seperated from daughters. It looks like men forcing them to cohabit with and serve a man who will force himself on you and breed you like stock. It is the sadness of miscarriage and the realisation that your body won't hold up. It's mutilation and violence. It's watching the deaths of your friends knowing that none of them lived a truly happy life. It's watching your daughter grow up knowing that your husband will sell her into servitude and her husband will rape her until she dies, the same fate your lover and light of your life grants you. In some cases you didn't even take or make up a name.
Men's oppression is the oldest form of oppression, and yet women are still so strongly gripped by their love of dick that there is a refusal to acknowledge the level of fantasy it takes to orgasm. They have barely even started convincing their man to let them come, and their sisters still face the romance I have described above. Women are always one step away from actually climaxing, and yet the movement meant to fight for women's stimulation is being overun by men and women who like pretending even more. It's easier for them to just say "ahhh oh ahhh" than accept it.
Women need to learn their realty, the grim and dull reality of it. The truth of their pleasure under patriarchy. If they don't get a new hobby or literally anything, then the next date is another dance and he's going for sex when he takes them home.
you ever just think about how across the whole of human history, the window of time where women have been able to choose not to spend their lives cooking and cleaning and being pregnant for men they never wanted to marry is so vanishingly small, and even then that’s not an option for women in lots of areas of the world, and there are girls being taken out of school and forced to marry at 12 years old, and if nothing changes for them then all they’ll ever know is a life of forced servitude and abuse and rape, and how some men just see this as fucking normal
you ever just think about how the gulf between women’s rights in different countries is so massive and there are men working their fingers to the bone to strip back reproductive rights because they look at their society where women can live their lives free from being shackled to men through financial dependence and constant pregnancy and childbirth and think ‘this won’t do at all’
you ever just think about the surge of ‘tradwife’ propaganda and how people are romanticising the vulnerability and dependence that some women would kill to break out of. how women are romanticising their own oppression
"Haha why are people obsessed with trans people they're like 1% of the population!" Great question! On a completely unrelated note, why does society have to completely change how they function and why does the entire LGB community have to lie about their entire history and attraction and include everything and why do women have to completely erase their spaces and language for such a small percentage of the population? If it's such a small percentage of the population that "isn't worth obsessing over" why do you insist everyone obsess over you?
honestly, a lot of problems society has could have been solved if only male opinion wasn't considered valid by default. yk the stuff they have done to women for centuries? like a woman's testimony is worth half that of a man, etc. i mean, considering how much stuff they literally pull out of their ass, like "white women fuck dogs", "lesbians have the highest DV rate, "teenagers are the most fertile" and even historical stuff like "penis envy", "women are emotional and men are rational", i think it's absolutely justified. male opinion should be considered worthless, unless supported by mountains of objective proof 🙂👍
lmao look at this Bad Woman being mocked and humiliated by liberal men. thank god that i, a Morally Good Woman with Correct Opinions, will never be in her place!
Liberal men could never be misogynistic themselves. Homeless teenage girls feel empowered by letting male strangers stick their dicks in them and beat them up for good measure in order to eat. Women and girls in porn (who are not trafficked because they said on camera that it's consensual and there's no way that could be coerced) feel empowered by being deep throated until they throw up and then being forced to drink a mixture of their own vomit and their male co-star's piss. It's fine that these videos are inspiring other men to hit and strangle their sexual partners because having a man simulate raping you is a cure for your trauma from those times a man or boy straight up raped you. It's much more progressive than taking them to court. Going to prison or being put on a sex offender registry would make rapists sad and rapists have feelings, you know! I'm such a Morally Good Woman with Correct Opinions. Why do I still feel so unsafe? It must be all those right wing and centrist antifeminists. I'm not an antifeminist though. I'm a Morally Good Woman with Correct Opinions. Look at those evil man hating harridans being mocked and humiliated by liberal men. thank god that i, a Morally Good Woman with Correct Opinions, will never be in her place!
discoholicmusic
jbbartram-illu
theartofmadeline
kianamaiart
blakekathryn
