
Origami Around

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
occasionally subtle
The Bowery Presents
No title available

bliss lane

shark vs the universe
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
$LAYYYTER
The Stonewall Inn
Game of Thrones Daily

No title available
No title available
EXPECTATIONS

★
Sade Olutola
h

PR's Tumblrdome
Show & Tell
seen from Argentina

seen from Germany
seen from Germany

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Colombia
seen from Tunisia
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Argentina

seen from Türkiye
seen from Bulgaria
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia

seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from Türkiye
seen from Ecuador
@soleminisanction
I love how "Sinners" didn't villify the sinners in the movie. Sammie's father told him that playing music for "drunkards and philanderers who abandon their family responbilities to sweat all over each other" was a sin. And he was right about the kind of people going to the juke joint: Delta Slim is an alcoholic, and Pearline a cheater. It would have been easy to villify them, but the movie tells us that despite their flaws, they are humans worthy of love, respect and freedom.
Delta Slim drinks because he's traumatized by the horrors Black people of his time face. And he's kind and compassionate, encouraging and reassuring Sammie, and sacrificing himself to save everyone else.
Pearline literally saved Sammie's life and sacrificed herself to protect him, a boy she had only known for a day. It shows her kindness because she could have easily stayed back when Remmick tried to bite Sammy and not endangered her life more than necessary.
The movie shows us that preachers blindly condemning those sinners are wrong: Sammie is only alive because drunkards, philanderers and gangsters (Smoke) gave their lives to protect him. They are people, with flaws and qualities.
I love how nuanced the movie is: Sammie's father is not wrong about the kind of people Sammie wants to associate with and their potential bad influence, but he's wrong about them being evil and not deserving of respect.
Jason went from humid Louisiana to Seattle 😭?
After rejecting an offer from Nightwing, the next generation of the Teen Titans have chosen Red Hood as their mentor! But does the harrowed former boy wonder have what it takes to control these impulsive heroes of tomorrow? The clock is ticking to save their missing friend as the kids take their team out of the chat rooms and onto the streets of Seattle for their first stake out and attempt to infiltrate Ascend.
twitter is having pedophile jason todd discourse
whats that one about the commons and the goose
The law locks up the man or woman Who steals the goose off the common But leaves the greater villain loose Who steals the common from the goose.
The law demands that we atone When we take things we do not own But leaves the lords and ladies fine Who takes things that are yours and mine.
The poor and wretched don’t escape If they conspire the law to break; This must be so but they endure Those who conspire to make the law.
The law locks up the man or woman Who steals the goose from off the common And geese will still a common lack Till they go and steal it back.
17th century english anti-enclosure poem
there’s just something so awesome about a character you love getting really badly hurt
The irony of positioning system-obsessed gearheads as the ideological opposite of Collaborative Storytelling wonks who think all tabletop RPGs ultimately have identical creative goals from which the actual text is a mere distraction is that if you actually talk to both, the second guy is considerably more likely to be the one who's never heard of any tabletop RPGs other than Dungeons & Dragons.
Like, you can totally see how one would get there. If you start with the false assumption that collaborative storytelling is the central creative goal of all tabletop RPGs, and compound it with the false assumption that all tabletop RPGs are essentially similar to D&D, "the text of tabletop RPGs is unrelated to their goals" is the inevitable conclusion – but you'd have to be tremendously incurious to just let that conclusion stand rather than thinking "hey, wait a fucking minute".
I LITERALLY CANNOT BELIEVE IT
Today I was at the summer event like festival with my sisters and a cousin AND MY ELDEST SISTER FOUND IMPULSES COMIC OMGOMGOMG IM SO DEAD DUDE
like I was literally in every corner of comic shops of my city in which isn’t a lot of DC Comics where I barely could even find general thin comics (also there’s no Superman, Flash, Wonder Woman comics like AT ALL)
BUT THERES IMPULSE IN ENGLISH AND MORE THAN JUST 1 ISSUE??????? That’s absolutely insane like how much are the chances?? Also today I’ve met my aunts and uncle!! ALSO SM OF MY COUSINS there was like 10 of us
Today was such a good day I was so happy😭😭😭 oh joyous day
DC announced Vixen's first-ever ongoing series and Static's return at San Diego Comic-Con 2026, marking a major moment for Black superheroes
People have such a big problem with the concept of abusers loving the people they abuse
Both the depictions of
"This character is an abuser and therefore is incapable of real love toward the person they abuse" (I acknowledge they are abusive, and that makes them a monster)
and
"This character loves that other character so they can't possibly be abusing them" (I acknowledge they aren't a monster, and therefore they aren't abusive)
Are collectively the most harmful ideas to spread about abuse
Because the core concept (abusers can't love you or be good to you genuinely) is so connected to getting trapped an abusive cycle. They love them, they aren't always bad. It's a very defensive feeling. "I love them and they love me and you have to admit I'm a difficult person sometimes, so it's not what you think it is. They aren't like that. Not really."
For @steamberrystudio 's Daaz💖✨️
Bat Hawk (Macheiramphus alcinus), family Accipitridae, order Accipitriformes, Sabah, Borneo
photograph by William Ko
Here's my read on Jack Drake, as a freestyle personal interpretation:
He probably thinks he's a good father because he provides Tim with a comfortable home and a good education, but doesn't put much more effort in than that due to being raised to believe that a husband and father's role is that of a distant breadwinner who gets to enjoy the perks of having a kid to play/bond with on the weekends. While Janet was alive he leaned on her for the majority of the parenting, and after she died he struggles with Tim's independence and disobedience, falling back on boarding school to provide the discipline he can't. That later point is further exacerbated by...
He also probably thinks he's a good father because he doesn't beat his child, but doesn't consider childhood spanking to be the same thing. In his mind, spanking a child is "Necessary Discipline," which makes it okay, while hitting a teenager in anger would be abuse. Screaming at and belittling them before destroying their belongings, though, that's appropriate "discipline" for his teenager.
He probably thinks he's a feminist because he's for universal suffrage and bodily autonomy, would never lay hands on a woman, and was attracted to and married an outspoken go-getter career girl. But he was also disappointed when that career girl, Janet, didn't want to "settle down" and become a good stay-at-home mom after she bore their child. Her outspokenness meant she'd push back against him when he expected to be obeyed as the Master of the House, leading to arguments and, if she'd survived long enough, a likely divorce. And if she had wanted to abort that child so she could focus on her career? He would've blown his top, because it might be her body but that's his child.
He probably thinks he's tolerant because his company had diverse hiring policies and he doesn't personally believe gay people should be stoned to death. But he's not actually the one who instituted those hiring practices, he never would've thought to do so, and also he uncritically believes that the "bad neighborhoods" of Gotham are all the places where people of color live, and that gay men holding hands should be considered public indecency.
As a result of the above, he would probably struggle to accept things when he learned Tim was queer, and while he would probably come around to begrudgingly accepting it in the end, it would only happen after he worked his way through a violently negative initial reaction. I've always thought he'd react exactly the way he did when he found out about Robin -- he'd find someone to blame for "corrupting" his son (likely Tim's boyfriend) and go after that person with a gun with the intent of scaring them off, and then he'd essentially demand Tim go back in the closet and impose a bunch of new restrictions to make sure he stayed there.
(If you want to get extra spicy, Tim only dated Black women after Jack's death. Do you know how many white parents think they're anti-racist until their child brings home a Black partner?)
He would, eventually, be forced to accept the reality of his situation, because he does love Tim and doesn't want to lose him, but it would almost certainly be another thorn in their relationship.
In short, he thinks he's a good person because he gives lots of money to charity. And he does do that. He also self-funds archeological expeditions of dubious ethical origins and thinks the activists lobbying him to stop are a bunch of unemployed hippie losers with nothing better to do than harass him.
He's a typical white conservative American everyman, in other words. Not the world's worst father -- in the DCU, he probably doesn't even make the top 100 worst dads, given all the unethical science-daddies and actually abusive villain origin stories out there. But he's also not a good dad. He's a normal kind of bad parent. Nuanced, human, and normal, but still not great or even good. He's mediocre at his best, and he's usually not at his best.
Real thing that changed how i write: I started asking "what does this character think is wrong with them" and separately "what is actually wrong with them." Those two things are almost never the same. She thinks she's too much. She's actually terrified of being too little. He thinks he's bad at commitment. He's actually just never met someone he trusted enough. The gap between their diagnosis of themselves and the real thing, that's your character arc right there. you don't have to explain it. just write both.
digital selfharm is real. do NOT check up on that ex-partner/ex-friend. do NOT reread those old messages/conversations that you know will hurt your feelings all over again or that will otherwise make you feel like shit. do NOT block evade to see if you’re being talked about. inhale. exhale. let it pass and you’ll be better for it.
When you get amnesia and forget you're trans.
(This is unironically one of the reasons I kept Jay as a trans man in my hc)
i was training a young person at work, and she referred to sexual assault as "SA" out loud, and i immediately was like, "no, it's sexual assault, call it what it is," bc idgaf if the algorithm overlords have taught y'all that you should fear direct language, how tf do any of you expect to ever address real issues with any amount of seriousness if you can't even say the words? imagine an advocate looking a sexual assault survivor in the eyes and asking "did he grape you?" it's absolutely fucking absurd, but these young interns and new hires are coming into an environment where we deal with survivors of all different kinds of abuse, and they're coming with the mindset that the words are as bad as the actions, and that makes them shitty at the job and look juvenile af
i HATE self-censorship for a lot of reasons, but being in crisis work makes it even more frustrating. who are you censoring for? like i am being so fr, WHO are you censoring for? have you even thought it through? people who have been raped know that they have been raped. if someone attempts suicide or is grieving someone who did, saying "sewer slide" isn't going to protect them from any of the feelings. a murder victim's family isn't going to feel better bc you said "unalived" instead of murdered. if anything, it's just extremely invalidating and othering. it's saying "what happened to you is so bad that i won't even say the word," which is NOT trauma-informed care. you are not protecting survivors/victims when you self-censor. the ONLY things you protect when you self-censor are the puritanical ideologies that are being encouraged by rich fascists who want your money and obedience
say the fucking words, guys. just say the goddamn words before i go insane!!!