hello vonnie
Love Begins
ellievsbear
Sweet Seals For You, Always
❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
The Stonewall Inn
Doug Jones
Game of Thrones Daily
blake kathryn
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
No title available
taylor price
YOU ARE THE REASON
Not today Justin
EXPECTATIONS
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
#extradirty
shark vs the universe
NASA
roma★
seen from Switzerland
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Colombia
seen from Spain
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from Spain
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Türkiye
seen from Colombia
seen from Argentina
seen from Spain
seen from Canada
@starryy-berryy
First in my bloodline to witness mahabharat memes.
Cred: Pinterest
iska sticker banao @zeherili-ankhein
LMAOLMAO YES
Also another version with Karn and Ashwatthama in place of Shakuni and Krishna respectively
and shalya in place of ashwatthama
a random day in a forest Bharat: *crying screaming throwing up* Lakshman: *displays murderous intent towards bharat* Shatrughna: *a hallucination* Ram: be a big brother, they said. it will be fun, they said.
tumblr users checking someone's blog before following back
Hot take: I cannot see Radha and Krishna as romantic lovers.
Probably cause they're 10 year olds who won't know the difference between romance and friendship? I mean, they are gods but still children.
I see them as platonic soulmates, but for romantic soulmates, Rukmini x Krishna has my heart
IKRRR IKRRR Like they are besties who did shenanigans together to annoy the parents and that's what they were nothing more nothing less.
Exactly. It gives me the ick to see people ship them when they were CHILDREN. They were 10.
but thats the thing. in later puranas, i think krishna is aged up, plus a more playboyish(?) persona is attached with him. idk how to describe it but it feels so icky to see him described like that knowing that he was a child in the harivamsha.
radha-krishna give me heavy platonic soulmates/bestie vibes. plus the ashtasakhis being besties along with dau and krishna's other frens. someone make a series abt them doing fun shits pls.
@starryy-berryy That's another side to it. I've seen people hate on krishna for being a "playboy". He was not. Radha and the ashtasakhis/gopis are his FRIENDS. his wives are all lakshmi, and majority of them were rescued/offered in marriage to him (except rukmini but that's a different story)
I don't like it when texts describe him as a playboy teen with radha. When I studied krishnakarnamrtam, there are slokas that describe him that way and I was like 🥸
+1
I hate it. It feels like the sexualization of someone who was supposed to be a child, but because a child cannot do such activities, he was aged up for plot purposes. I love the gopis being friends of Krishna, and him doing kiddie stuffs, since it has very sweet vibes tbh
like i do support folk customs and retellings but this specific thing always gives me the ick.
thats why i like little krishna the most out of all shows on krishna, because radha and krishna don't really have a romantic relationship in it, plus all the characters are shown as CHILDREN.
@starryy-berryy and krishna aur kans. They were children in that also.
One mention of smth in that weird krishnavataram movie, krishna and radha were shown as adults, the raas leela was shown to be romanticized and krishna was shown stealing the gopis clothes as an ADULT. 5-6 year old krishna is reasonable, he did it as a prank, but a 30-smth guy shown on screen stealing women's clothes? JAIL. even if he's a God.
Sure, people say it's bhama's imagination, but to show an adult playing a child was fucking weird.
oooh, i have not watched krishna aur kans yet (planning to watch it tho)
i didnt watch krishnavataram either because the trailer felt a bit weird to me tbh. and yeah. why the fuck is a grown up guy doing shenanigans that a KID did? like butter stealing, breaking pots, stealing clothes and all? he was a CHILD. that's why those things feel endearing. it becomes creepy when a grown ass guy does it on screen. idk why ppl dont understand this because it looks hella weird.
(camera pans to random baba log behaving like kids and saying omg we are behaving like krishna. not to mention the ppl who grope women in vrindavan especially in holi and say we are doing rasleela like krishna did.)
like stop using him to defend your shit behavior ToT
@starryy-berryy PEOPLE DO THAT? EW. No wonder I got the ick from the place when I went
I'm not hating on Vrindavan, the area and people now give me the ick.
I was treated like shit and hated on once for MENTIONING Dwarkadish Krishna...
wait what?
they hated you because you mentioned Krishna was Dwarkadhish? wtf?
....
BRUH.
Vrindavan used to be so peaceful (in the videos of the 60s and 70s) but idk whats happened to the place now. every year i see instances of women getting groped in holi there, one girl was even groped right in front of the idol of Krishna in the main temple there.
@starryy-berryy bro, I went only 4 years ago. trust me, Vrindavan is not safe anymore. There's litter everywhere, monkeys and men steal your stuff and there's literally no sense of hygiene. I hope they make efforts like how Ayodhya was done.
the only place I ever felt safe there was in front of Banke Bihari...
thats sad tbh. vrindavan is like, one of the most imp places for krishna bhakts, and the current state is unfortunate but kya kar sakte hain. i js know im not planning to visit vrindavan anymore.
First in my bloodline to witness mahabharat memes.
Cred: Pinterest
iska sticker banao @zeherili-ankhein
Spy x Family is fundamentally an adoption story.
Obviously Anya is adopted. We all know this. She knows this. She loves her family but knows it is incredibly fragile.
But unlike most adoption stories (say Natsume Yuujinchou) Anya is not adopted into a loving functional family who's main goal is to support and love her until she heals from all the hurt she has been through.
Because Everyone in their family is adopted.
Yor enters thinking she is entering an existing family dynamic of a man and his daughter. She is the step mother, eagerly wanted but a definite outsider. She does not know about how they lost Loid's first wife. They both Never mention her but Anya clearly has Huge feelings about her Mommy that she cannot touch. Because Loid refuses to acknowledge her. Which means she's not allowed to.
She's a wife brought in to solve a problem. The fact she adores Anya and loves Loid (eventually) doesn't make her any less of an outsider from her perspective. To Yor she's the adopted family member.
Meanwhile Loid, the one who brought them all together almost instantly finds himself on the outside of the family. He works too much and doesn't make it home for dinner frequently. He struggles to connect with his 'daughter' and wife. Can't understand either of them despite constant efforts. Something incredibly distressing for him.
Yor instantly connects with this child when he struggled to hold her hand in public. In his eyes Yor and Anya are a family and he is the outsider only there for the mission. The man who is destined to Not be there. He too often fills the role of the outside child brought into a happy family. One he constantly feels he is fumbling or failing. (If I'm not good, if i'm not perfect- my family will leave me. So I have to be. I have to figure out how to be better)
They are a family of adopted members all holding so tightly to each other. Each one of them chooses the others over and over again. Struggles against their own limitations and fears to be a part of a family they're all terrified to really call their own.
But it is that choice that makes them a family. Not blood or marriage or any certificate. That they all keep trying to be a family to the others. I'll be a good girl and study hard Papa. I'll be a good wife, I'll play my role well so don't abandon me. I'll be a good father and husband, I will try to be a good husband and father if you both will just stay with me. Please. I will figure out how.
Spy x Family is an adoption story.
The Forgers!
Hot take: I cannot see Radha and Krishna as romantic lovers.
Probably cause they're 10 year olds who won't know the difference between romance and friendship? I mean, they are gods but still children.
I see them as platonic soulmates, but for romantic soulmates, Rukmini x Krishna has my heart
IKRRR IKRRR Like they are besties who did shenanigans together to annoy the parents and that's what they were nothing more nothing less.
Exactly. It gives me the ick to see people ship them when they were CHILDREN. They were 10.
but thats the thing. in later puranas, i think krishna is aged up, plus a more playboyish(?) persona is attached with him. idk how to describe it but it feels so icky to see him described like that knowing that he was a child in the harivamsha.
radha-krishna give me heavy platonic soulmates/bestie vibes. plus the ashtasakhis being besties along with dau and krishna's other frens. someone make a series abt them doing fun shits pls.
@starryy-berryy That's another side to it. I've seen people hate on krishna for being a "playboy". He was not. Radha and the ashtasakhis/gopis are his FRIENDS. his wives are all lakshmi, and majority of them were rescued/offered in marriage to him (except rukmini but that's a different story)
I don't like it when texts describe him as a playboy teen with radha. When I studied krishnakarnamrtam, there are slokas that describe him that way and I was like 🥸
+1
I hate it. It feels like the sexualization of someone who was supposed to be a child, but because a child cannot do such activities, he was aged up for plot purposes. I love the gopis being friends of Krishna, and him doing kiddie stuffs, since it has very sweet vibes tbh
like i do support folk customs and retellings but this specific thing always gives me the ick.
thats why i like little krishna the most out of all shows on krishna, because radha and krishna don't really have a romantic relationship in it, plus all the characters are shown as CHILDREN.
@starryy-berryy and krishna aur kans. They were children in that also.
One mention of smth in that weird krishnavataram movie, krishna and radha were shown as adults, the raas leela was shown to be romanticized and krishna was shown stealing the gopis clothes as an ADULT. 5-6 year old krishna is reasonable, he did it as a prank, but a 30-smth guy shown on screen stealing women's clothes? JAIL. even if he's a God.
Sure, people say it's bhama's imagination, but to show an adult playing a child was fucking weird.
oooh, i have not watched krishna aur kans yet (planning to watch it tho)
i didnt watch krishnavataram either because the trailer felt a bit weird to me tbh. and yeah. why the fuck is a grown up guy doing shenanigans that a KID did? like butter stealing, breaking pots, stealing clothes and all? he was a CHILD. that's why those things feel endearing. it becomes creepy when a grown ass guy does it on screen. idk why ppl dont understand this because it looks hella weird.
(camera pans to random baba log behaving like kids and saying omg we are behaving like krishna. not to mention the ppl who grope women in vrindavan especially in holi and say we are doing rasleela like krishna did.)
like stop using him to defend your shit behavior ToT
@starryy-berryy PEOPLE DO THAT? EW. No wonder I got the ick from the place when I went
I'm not hating on Vrindavan, the area and people now give me the ick.
I was treated like shit and hated on once for MENTIONING Dwarkadish Krishna...
wait what?
they hated you because you mentioned Krishna was Dwarkadhish? wtf?
....
BRUH.
Vrindavan used to be so peaceful (in the videos of the 60s and 70s) but idk whats happened to the place now. every year i see instances of women getting groped in holi there, one girl was even groped right in front of the idol of Krishna in the main temple there.
Hot take: I cannot see Radha and Krishna as romantic lovers.
Probably cause they're 10 year olds who won't know the difference between romance and friendship? I mean, they are gods but still children.
I see them as platonic soulmates, but for romantic soulmates, Rukmini x Krishna has my heart
IKRRR IKRRR Like they are besties who did shenanigans together to annoy the parents and that's what they were nothing more nothing less.
Exactly. It gives me the ick to see people ship them when they were CHILDREN. They were 10.
but thats the thing. in later puranas, i think krishna is aged up, plus a more playboyish(?) persona is attached with him. idk how to describe it but it feels so icky to see him described like that knowing that he was a child in the harivamsha.
radha-krishna give me heavy platonic soulmates/bestie vibes. plus the ashtasakhis being besties along with dau and krishna's other frens. someone make a series abt them doing fun shits pls.
@starryy-berryy That's another side to it. I've seen people hate on krishna for being a "playboy". He was not. Radha and the ashtasakhis/gopis are his FRIENDS. his wives are all lakshmi, and majority of them were rescued/offered in marriage to him (except rukmini but that's a different story)
I don't like it when texts describe him as a playboy teen with radha. When I studied krishnakarnamrtam, there are slokas that describe him that way and I was like 🥸
+1
I hate it. It feels like the sexualization of someone who was supposed to be a child, but because a child cannot do such activities, he was aged up for plot purposes. I love the gopis being friends of Krishna, and him doing kiddie stuffs, since it has very sweet vibes tbh
like i do support folk customs and retellings but this specific thing always gives me the ick.
thats why i like little krishna the most out of all shows on krishna, because radha and krishna don't really have a romantic relationship in it, plus all the characters are shown as CHILDREN.
@starryy-berryy and krishna aur kans. They were children in that also.
One mention of smth in that weird krishnavataram movie, krishna and radha were shown as adults, the raas leela was shown to be romanticized and krishna was shown stealing the gopis clothes as an ADULT. 5-6 year old krishna is reasonable, he did it as a prank, but a 30-smth guy shown on screen stealing women's clothes? JAIL. even if he's a God.
Sure, people say it's bhama's imagination, but to show an adult playing a child was fucking weird.
oooh, i have not watched krishna aur kans yet (planning to watch it tho)
i didnt watch krishnavataram either because the trailer felt a bit weird to me tbh. and yeah. why the fuck is a grown up guy doing shenanigans that a KID did? like butter stealing, breaking pots, stealing clothes and all? he was a CHILD. that's why those things feel endearing. it becomes creepy when a grown ass guy does it on screen. idk why ppl dont understand this because it looks hella weird.
(camera pans to random baba log behaving like kids and saying omg we are behaving like krishna. not to mention the ppl who grope women in vrindavan especially in holi and say we are doing rasleela like krishna did.)
like stop using him to defend your shit behavior ToT
Hot take: I cannot see Radha and Krishna as romantic lovers.
Probably cause they're 10 year olds who won't know the difference between romance and friendship? I mean, they are gods but still children.
I see them as platonic soulmates, but for romantic soulmates, Rukmini x Krishna has my heart
IKRRR IKRRR Like they are besties who did shenanigans together to annoy the parents and that's what they were nothing more nothing less.
Exactly. It gives me the ick to see people ship them when they were CHILDREN. They were 10.
but thats the thing. in later puranas, i think krishna is aged up, plus a more playboyish(?) persona is attached with him. idk how to describe it but it feels so icky to see him described like that knowing that he was a child in the harivamsha.
radha-krishna give me heavy platonic soulmates/bestie vibes. plus the ashtasakhis being besties along with dau and krishna's other frens. someone make a series abt them doing fun shits pls.
@starryy-berryy That's another side to it. I've seen people hate on krishna for being a "playboy". He was not. Radha and the ashtasakhis/gopis are his FRIENDS. his wives are all lakshmi, and majority of them were rescued/offered in marriage to him (except rukmini but that's a different story)
I don't like it when texts describe him as a playboy teen with radha. When I studied krishnakarnamrtam, there are slokas that describe him that way and I was like 🥸
+1
I hate it. It feels like the sexualization of someone who was supposed to be a child, but because a child cannot do such activities, he was aged up for plot purposes. I love the gopis being friends of Krishna, and him doing kiddie stuffs, since it has very sweet vibes tbh
like i do support folk customs and retellings but this specific thing always gives me the ick.
thats why i like little krishna the most out of all shows on krishna, because radha and krishna don't really have a romantic relationship in it, plus all the characters are shown as CHILDREN.
me when i see the target audience of my post interacting with it
I find it really interesting that the Mahabharata tells us next to nothing abt Yaudheya (son of Yudhishthira and Devika, princess of sivi). Interestingly, there used to be a Yaudheya kingdom, which was near the historical Kuru kingdom (and even controlled some parts of it in certain periods).
Now Im wondering if Yudhishthira gave a part of the Kuru Kingdom to Yaudheya, who named it after himself...
yeah you fuckers dont say anything about the jharkhand protests not aesthetic enough for you is it?
Hot take: I cannot see Radha and Krishna as romantic lovers.
Probably cause they're 10 year olds who won't know the difference between romance and friendship? I mean, they are gods but still children.
I see them as platonic soulmates, but for romantic soulmates, Rukmini x Krishna has my heart
IKRRR IKRRR Like they are besties who did shenanigans together to annoy the parents and that's what they were nothing more nothing less.
Exactly. It gives me the ick to see people ship them when they were CHILDREN. They were 10.
but thats the thing. in later puranas, i think krishna is aged up, plus a more playboyish(?) persona is attached with him. idk how to describe it but it feels so icky to see him described like that knowing that he was a child in the harivamsha.
radha-krishna give me heavy platonic soulmates/bestie vibes. plus the ashtasakhis being besties along with dau and krishna's other frens. someone make a series abt them doing fun shits pls.
the way you police any depiction of devis while calling yourself a hindu leaves me baffled. the mahavidyas doesn't need a low creature like yourself to protect her sanctity. go away clown! tell your master to shut the fuck up!
p.s. the eastern shakta traditions were always misunderstood by the pretentious hindu lot, in fact, some northies. get a life, and some knowledge!
You know, this reminds me of this one time I came across an image in Pinterest of a murti depicting Maa Kali in the Shava Shiva Rudha aspect.
There were a couple comments (in transliterated Hindi) crying about how dare we depict Maa Kali and Mahadev in this manner...
"how dare you show a couple doing couple things!"
Im sorry but some of us don't see the gods doing these kind of acts as something vulgar or inherently bad. And we aren't sexualizing it either (and yes, many of us do see these deities as parental figures.)
why tf are ppl who cannot even differentiate between Chinnamasta and Kali preaching about how she should be portrayed or not? It was a form of art to present the story of the Mahavidyas in the form of a dance play. You want them to change aspects of the story to fit your sensitized version of events?
ATP us eastern indian shaktas and our customs have been villified so much by this people who know shit abt them. we don't go telling you how to practice your customs, do we? then why don't you offer the same courtesy to us?
also, durga puja is coming, so we will again see people shaming us for consuming non veg in this time. well, we will continue to do that. cry harder.
oshur behaviour is always humbled before maa. praying for that <3
i showed that controversial video to my mom, and she was like "yeah and the people who are being offended by this are probably fine with all the actual vulgar acts being performed by hindus rn."
and she is not wrong. wdym that there is a video from the kanwar yatra going on where dancers dressed as shiva-parvati are doing ACTUAL vulgar steps to entertain people?
is that not offensive? oh but yes. a lore accurate depiction of a goddess who is supposed to be naked is wrong. got it.
Laut aao please 🤧😔
OHMAIGOD HONEYPOPS
Got reminded of it's taste the moment i saw its pic #crine
