tumblr dot com
Stranger Things
Keni
macklin celebrini has autism
Aqua Utopia|海の底で記憶を紡ぐ
almost home

Kaledo Art

No title available

⁂
Xuebing Du
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her

#extradirty

oozey mess
NASA

No title available
dirt enthusiast

Love Begins
$LAYYYTER

JVL
No title available

seen from Colombia
seen from United States

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
@stevencloud
Spacebase 003 #illustration #drawing #space #spacebase #truck #spaceship #plants #art #robot #agriculture #tree #trees #moon #cloud #cactus
Spacebase 003 (detail) . . . . #illustration #drawing #space #spacebase #truck #spaceship #plants #art #robot #agriculture #tree #trees #cactus #cacti
Spacebase 003 (detail) . . . . #illustration #drawing #space #spacebase #truck #spaceship #plants #art #robot #agriculture #tree #trees
Spacebase 003 (detail) https://www.instagram.com/stevencloud.drawings
This is 1/3 of a series of restaurant placemats I drew for kids. Unfortunately, Shoney's and Denny's passed on theses. Oh, well! (2012) . . . . #bigfoot #sasquatch #moon #butterfly #caterpillar #hair #placemat #dennys #shoneys
Dream house. . . . . #agriculture #treefarm #spacebase #space #spaceship #drawing #illustration #art #ipadpro #applepencil #tree #trees #dome
Changing it up today with a #Chupacabra I drew a couple years. #chupacabra #illustration #drawing #art #monster #fable #ledgend
Spacebase Detail (2015) #agriculture #treefarm #spacebase #space #spaceship #drawing #illustration #art #ipadpro #applepencil #tree #trees #mountain
Spacebase (2015) #agriculture #treefarm #spacebase #space #spaceship #drawing #illustration #art #ipadpro #applepencil
Spacebase Tree Farm (2015) #illustration #drawing #space #spacebase #helicopter #spaceship #plants #art #trees #robot #agriculture #treefarm #farm
https://www.instagram.com/stevencloud.drawings/
Spacebase 001 - Detail #illustration #drawing #space #spacebase #truck #spaceship #plants #robot #art
More drawings here: https://www.instagram.com/stevencloud.drawings/
Proposed Council Pay Raise Would Move Salary from Top 2.3% to Top 0.3% of All NYC Employees
Today, the City Council will hold a hearing on pay raises for certain elected officials, including themselves. They are also proposing some other bills that are meant to increase transparency and reduce conflicts of interest within the body.
One bill that caught my eye seeks to “require the financial disclosure forms of elected officials to be made available for public inspection on the conflict of interest board’s website.” At first blush, this sounds great. But I noticed something was missing… The bill included no mention of the data being released in a machine readable format. I see PDFs in our future!
I’m disappointed to see that the council routinely drafts bills without this important caveat. Transparency without machine readability is not real. Take, for example, the Citizen Complaint Review Board- an agency designed to provide oversight and transparency over police complaints. Want to know the monthly number of complaints filed against the police each month for the last four years, or what percent of those ended in charges? No problem just open 48 PDFs one at a time and scroll until you find the appropriate table, which will have the monthly value you seek. Don’t have time to do that? Either does anybody else.
You see, PDFs are where information goes to die, rather than to be used. Despite this, New York City continues to use PDFs to release so much of its own data and the Council does not seem to include this important caveat in so many of its important information sharing bills.
With the hearing coming, I set out to find more information on NYC salaries to understand the context of the proposed Council salary increase. While doing research, it came as no surprise that I could only find the data in our city budget– in PDF format. Luckily, there are talented people out there that can extract the data, and in this case Chris Whong and other members of BetaNYC wrote a scraper and released a copy of the Salary portion of the City Budget.
The budget shows average salaries for each job title in the City, as well as the number of positions needed with that position. A list of the positions with the highest and lowest salaries can be seen below.
Note that Council Members are not on this list. In fact, the budget shows 6,404 people with 316 unique job titles that have base salaries more than the Council Members, or 2.3% of all city workers. If the salary increase is approved, that number would dramatically drop to just 816 city employees with higher salaries, putting Council Members in the top 0.3% of city employees. In short, the Council Members would be jumping ahead of the 87% of city employees who currently get paid more than them. The jump would be from red bar to green bar in the histogram below.
The list of job titles with average pay higher than the Council Members is varied, and I’ve listed the most common titles below. Those in red would still be paid more even after the raise while those in black would fall behind.
While looking at Council pay, it was also interesting to see that Council Member’s staff (outside of the Speaker’s office) are not listed as salary items in the budget. I found an alternative source for that data and learned that Council Member’s staff are paid significantly less than most NYC employees. The median salary for Council Member staff is around $35,000. This is less than one fourth of what the Council Members are proposing as their new salary. It’s also less than 87% of all New York City Employees and its about half the median income of all New York City Employees.
City Council Members play a vital role in our city, as the boots on the ground that interact with and represent all New Yorkers. Given that, there is reason to believe that a raise may be justified for them (and one day for their staff). But what is not justified is the continued lack of machine readable language in transparency bills. If we are going to have intelligent debates about the future of our city, we will need the data to back them up.
Sources/Tools: -Analysis done in Beaker Notebook -Tables made in Excel -Raw Data for City Budget is here -Raw data for Council Staff Salaries scraped from Empire Center Website.
Caveats: -Budget only provides Average Salaries per title. For this analysis, I assumed each person got the same salary given their title though there may by some variance there. -City Council Pay includes some part time workers but they are not specified in the data. However, if you conservatively remove the salaries that are less than 25K, the median only goes up to 40K. So the analysis is not greatly affected. Of course if we were not scraping this data, we would be able to do this more carefully. -Rankings are based on Fiscal 2015 budget (latest available), while Council Staff salaries are form Fiscal 2014 budget (latest available).
On the grotesque obsession with accomplished women's fertility
Rebecca Solnit is a brilliant writer whose essay Men Explain Things to Me sparked the discourse about “mansplaining” and whose 2009 book A Paradise Built in Hell is one of the best history books I’ve ever read – so why do so many interviewers want to talk to her about the fact that she chose not to have babies?
In her latest Easy Chair column for Harper’s, Solnit describes several incidents in which interviewers insisted on drilling her on the topic, and notes that the phenomenon isn’t limited to her alone: during the Q&A on a talk she gave about Virginia Woolf, the audience were fascinated by the question of why Woolf chose not to become a mother. This is curious, Solnit notes, because “many people have children; only one made To the Lighthouse and The Waves, and we were discussing Woolf because of the books, not the babies.”
Solnit investigates the phenomenon with her characteristic brilliance, linking it to pop philosophical notions of happiness, and noting that discussion of Snowden’s actions were dominated by the question of why someone would leave a good job and a nice home in Hawaii and a relationship with a smart, beautiful woman to reveal the criminality of the US government and its partners.
http://boingboing.net/2015/11/22/on-the-grotesque-obsession-wit.html
Some suggestions for sad, rich people
My take: systems of oppression are terrible for everyone, even the people they nominally benefit. That’s what makes them such wicked problems. If you’re rich, you need a story to tell yourself about why you deserve so much more than everyone else, and that story is inevitably about some innate superiority that you possess relative to the 99.9% who trail so far behind you.
Once you’ve concluded that your wealth is a result of your worth, you’re left with the intractable problem of the people who are wealthier than you. Remember that late capitalism’s wealth distribution is a power-law curve: the 0.1% are much richer than the 1%, and 0.01% are even richer – the gap is comparable to the gap between the bottom 50% and the 1%.
If you’ve convinced yourself that your money reflects your worth as a human being, then what are you to make of people with much, muchmore money than you? Surely their existence is proof that you are very nearly worthless, relatively speaking. This is why rich people profess poverty: because they are so focused on the even-richer, they genuinely feel poor. Not “poor” in the sense of going hungry or worrying about the mortgage, of course, but sweating and precarious nevertheless. Rich people are prone to burning their money in status displays, purchasing extravagances that even they can barely afford in order to front the kind of wealth that they aspire to.
I think it’s fruitful to look to gender theory here, specifically the problem of toxic masculinity: men get a much, much better deal than women in society, and it still sucks. Profoundly unequal systems make everyone miserable, even the people that they enrich.
It’s a truism that you live your own blooper reel and everyone else’s highlight reel. It’s a truism that no two pains can be compared: the experience of pain is the intersection of circumstances and resilience. In other words: how you feel about your circumstances is determined by how bad those circumstances are, and how good you are at coping with them.
Scalzi’s advice to the rich is very good, but really, if rich people wanted to talk about the problems of being wealthy, they’d be received most sympathetically if they ended their complaints with a pledge to do something about the systems of inequality that produce their misery: “And that’s why I’m donating all my money to fighting for campaign finance reform.”
Read the rest