Sweet Seals For You, Always

titsay
untitled
NASA
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
Keni
tumblr dot com
todays bird
macklin celebrini has autism

Love Begins
Sade Olutola
The Bowery Presents

#extradirty
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
taylor price

pixel skylines
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
TVSTRANGERTHINGS
d e v o n
official daine visual archive
seen from United States
seen from Colombia

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Argentina
seen from Argentina

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
@stonehouse1406
"It's completely out of touch and is an insult to the American people and their lived experience!" -Luigi Mangione
"I say I am yet too young to understand that GOD is any respecter of persons. I believe that to have interfered as I have done, as I have always freely admitted I have done, in behalf of his despised poor, I have done no wrong, but RIGHT" -John Brown
Do not let Mangione become martyred like John Brown did. Deny, Defend, Depose!
I know this pissed the Christian right off
Pascal wager is an excellent example of religions being allergic to logic.
If no god or afterlife exists, no harm no foul.
But what happens if you are worshipping the WRONG god? There are more than 3000 deities recorded, and who knows how many have been forgotten- how do you know you aren't worshiping one of the false gods?
Even worse- how do you know if the new testament is real? What if the only god is the god of the old testament, who would be sickened by your worship of a mortal?
The price of your sin is far greater than mine.
I have headaches nearly every day, because if I dont raise my eyebrows to an alarming height, everyone in the world wants to believe that I must be angry or that I need to talk about my problems.
I'm just so tired having to constantly apologize because I had the luck of being born ugly
And EVERY time it turns into this long drawn out and unnecessary conversation about why I "look like somethings wrong"
And people must think they are some sort of shaman because they consistently try to convince me that im lying when I tell them I have no fucking clue what they are talking about.
I will never shy away from the word goon. goon is the only way to describe a particular type of henchman, lackey, or thug. look at these guys. they're goons.
Encounter: skategoons
I'm so tired
The only thing I want is silence
Just the pure silence of being alone
I have headaches nearly every day, because if I dont raise my eyebrows to an alarming height, everyone in the world wants to believe that I must be angry or that I need to talk about my problems.
I'm just so tired having to constantly apologize because I had the luck of being born ugly
What many misunderstand, is the nature of what hatred truly is.
It is a wide held belief that hatred is a burning passion with explosive outpourings of emotion.
But truly, hatred is patience.
Hatred will burn in silence for eternity, because time is hatreds true ally.
(ID in ALT text) its been a while since i posted some outfit doodles. not like these are new. they are from last year. but i never know where and how to upload these so here we go. at least the third ones pose is a bit funny hahah.
side note sokkas outfit in the third image is inspired by Victoria Kakuktinniq 2020 New York Fashion Week Ukiaksaq collection
Idgaf! Nothing nor anyone in this world will ever convince me that it is okay to shoot and kill a literal CHILD over a bottle of water. That baby's life was worth more than that and most importantly his life mattered.
Rest in Power Cyrus Carmack Belton 💖
I totally agree with you.
Would you agree that if Cyrus Carmack Belton pointed a loaded 9mm gun at someone, that would justify someone shooting him?
How many politicians have been assassinated by conservatives? Because that number ain't zero.
How.many times have you caucasian conservatives tried to assassinate your own president? Because that numbers not zero.
Tell us about the following people who pointed loaded guns at people.
Kyle Rittenhouse. Daniel Perry. Kenneth Pilon. Robin Westman. Devin Kelley. They were all taken alive after they committed multiple murders, and you started asking what the victims did to "set him off"
Sitting down before you fall down
Ah, Stonehouse, my old friend. I hope you are well. I'll gladly answer your questions as soon as you answer mine.
Weird how you assume he deserved being shot in the back. Normally a sign of someone leaving.
It sounds suspiciously like you are advocating for the execution of any "open-carry" proponents.
Its adorable that you only ever ask "what if he deserved it" when the dead body is a minority.
Sitting down before younfall down, idiot
I haven't assumed anything. I agreed with OP that nothing could convince me that a child deserves to be shot over a bottle of water.
I then posed a hypothetical question, which no one has answered. I doubt if you'll answer, but I'll pose my hypothetical question again.
Would you agree that if Cyrus Carmack Belton pointed a loaded 9mm gun at someone, that would justify someone shooting him?
Should George Zimmerman have faced death for stalking and assaulting a child? Because you applauded him.
Should Kyle Rittenhouse have been executed after he was observed threatening people with a rifle multiple times? Because you applauded him as well.
Ashli Babbitt physically attacked officers and broke into a federal building. You called it "excessive force".
Your question is posed in bad faith. Because you have no consistent internal logic to defend any available answer.
Try harder, dum dum.
It's not at all a bad faith question, I honestly have no idea whether Cyrus Belton pointed his gun at anyone. This is why I pose it as a hypothetical question.
You accuse me of having no consistent internal logic, but I am at least willing to answer questions you pose to me. All I ask is that you do the same and answer my question.
Cool
Then with the earlier examples in mind, tell us why Karmelo Anthony was not allowed comsidered self-defense
Very well, even though you refuse to answer my question, I’ll answer yours. First off, I’d like to see if we can at least agree on the facts of the case. I’ll start with what is known, then move on to what has been reported based on testimony. Karmelo Anthony and Austin were both at a track meet. When it started raining, Anthony took shelter in a tent set up by Metcalf’s team. An argument ensued which resulted in Anthony stabbing Metcalf in the heart. Anthony did not suffer any injuries from the incident. I’ll get into more detail regarding the argument, but are we in agreement of the facts so far?
LoL.
Conveniently leaving out that there were 4 dudes coming at him after multiple run ins in which multiple witnesses identify metcalf as the aggressor.
Your pathological need to Villify ONLY the minority in EVERY case you discuss is a symptom.
Yes, I've left a lot out, i just want to get agreement on the basic facts before we move on to more detail.
Are we in agreement of the basic facts?
Lol, youre following a very familiar pattern.
Cherry picking data to construct a narrative that justifies your racist idealogies. Over yhe years the only argument you haven't made is Phrenology, and even then you have come perilously close to outright eugenics theories.
Every single time its a minority you construct a hypothetical so you can believe that they deserved whatever happened to them, while with caucasians you invariably follow the "23 year old child " line they try to use to excuse people like Brock Turner.
"Bad faith argument" is your only ally, son
I believe you are projecting your own biases onto me, and I think I can demonstrate this. Here's a challenge. You give me an example of a real life, high profile, interracial confrontation where you side with the white person. I’ll give you a real life, high profile, interracial confrontation in which I side with the minority. We can do this over and over, and I’ll start.
I side with George Floyd against Derek Chauviin. George Floyd was not committing a violent crime, he was suspected of using a counterfeit bill at a store. Floyd was already handcuffed when Chauvin knelt on his neck, with Floyd pleading that he couldn’t breathe until he was dead. In fact he knelt on his neck even after Floyd was dead.
Derek Chauvin is where he belongs, in prison. I feel nothing but sympathy for George Floyd, who did nothing to deserve the treatment he was given.
Ok, your turn. I know of many examples where I side with the minority individual in high profile confrontations with white individuals, but if i’m right, you will be unwilling to give a single example where you side with the white individual.
Please, prove me wrong.
LoL, as if on cue you are now tapdancing backwards hoping someone else will validate your "position" when you've already proven both where your arguments originate from and why they hold no factual value.
Why would I engage in your bad faith argument when you previously engaged in hypothetical situations too justify the shooting of an 11 year old? Not to mention when you tried to convince yourself it was the minorities fault for defending themselves when police attacked the wrong address.
Bad faith arguments are your only weapon because you lack anything resembling a consistent internal logic.
Next you'll launch into denials and accuse me of either misrepresenting or misunderstanding your previous position, before claiming I'm "refusing to engage" with your bad faith arguments.
https://www.grammarly.com/blog/rhetorical-devices/bad-faith-good-faith/
There's a refresher for you!
Shares of SpaceX soared 24% in their Wall Street debut, making the rocket maker’s founder and CEO Elon Musk the first-ever trillionaire.
First Trillionaire is an African American.
Just remember what programs he cut to make that happen
https://nchv.org/veteran-homelessness/
Idgaf! Nothing nor anyone in this world will ever convince me that it is okay to shoot and kill a literal CHILD over a bottle of water. That baby's life was worth more than that and most importantly his life mattered.
Rest in Power Cyrus Carmack Belton 💖
I totally agree with you.
Would you agree that if Cyrus Carmack Belton pointed a loaded 9mm gun at someone, that would justify someone shooting him?
How many politicians have been assassinated by conservatives? Because that number ain't zero.
How.many times have you caucasian conservatives tried to assassinate your own president? Because that numbers not zero.
Tell us about the following people who pointed loaded guns at people.
Kyle Rittenhouse. Daniel Perry. Kenneth Pilon. Robin Westman. Devin Kelley. They were all taken alive after they committed multiple murders, and you started asking what the victims did to "set him off"
Sitting down before you fall down
Ah, Stonehouse, my old friend. I hope you are well. I'll gladly answer your questions as soon as you answer mine.
Weird how you assume he deserved being shot in the back. Normally a sign of someone leaving.
It sounds suspiciously like you are advocating for the execution of any "open-carry" proponents.
Its adorable that you only ever ask "what if he deserved it" when the dead body is a minority.
Sitting down before younfall down, idiot
I haven't assumed anything. I agreed with OP that nothing could convince me that a child deserves to be shot over a bottle of water.
I then posed a hypothetical question, which no one has answered. I doubt if you'll answer, but I'll pose my hypothetical question again.
Would you agree that if Cyrus Carmack Belton pointed a loaded 9mm gun at someone, that would justify someone shooting him?
Should George Zimmerman have faced death for stalking and assaulting a child? Because you applauded him.
Should Kyle Rittenhouse have been executed after he was observed threatening people with a rifle multiple times? Because you applauded him as well.
Ashli Babbitt physically attacked officers and broke into a federal building. You called it "excessive force".
Your question is posed in bad faith. Because you have no consistent internal logic to defend any available answer.
Try harder, dum dum.
It's not at all a bad faith question, I honestly have no idea whether Cyrus Belton pointed his gun at anyone. This is why I pose it as a hypothetical question.
You accuse me of having no consistent internal logic, but I am at least willing to answer questions you pose to me. All I ask is that you do the same and answer my question.
Cool
Then with the earlier examples in mind, tell us why Karmelo Anthony was not allowed comsidered self-defense
Very well, even though you refuse to answer my question, I’ll answer yours. First off, I’d like to see if we can at least agree on the facts of the case. I’ll start with what is known, then move on to what has been reported based on testimony. Karmelo Anthony and Austin were both at a track meet. When it started raining, Anthony took shelter in a tent set up by Metcalf’s team. An argument ensued which resulted in Anthony stabbing Metcalf in the heart. Anthony did not suffer any injuries from the incident. I’ll get into more detail regarding the argument, but are we in agreement of the facts so far?
LoL.
Conveniently leaving out that there were 4 dudes coming at him after multiple run ins in which multiple witnesses identify metcalf as the aggressor.
Your pathological need to Villify ONLY the minority in EVERY case you discuss is a symptom.
Yes, I've left a lot out, i just want to get agreement on the basic facts before we move on to more detail.
Are we in agreement of the basic facts?
Lol, youre following a very familiar pattern.
Cherry picking data to construct a narrative that justifies your racist idealogies. Over yhe years the only argument you haven't made is Phrenology, and even then you have come perilously close to outright eugenics theories.
Every single time its a minority you construct a hypothetical so you can believe that they deserved whatever happened to them, while with caucasians you invariably follow the "23 year old child " line they try to use to excuse people like Brock Turner.
"Bad faith argument" is your only ally, son
I believe you are projecting your own biases onto me, and I think I can demonstrate this. Here's a challenge. You give me an example of a real life, high profile, interracial confrontation where you side with the white person. I’ll give you a real life, high profile, interracial confrontation in which I side with the minority. We can do this over and over, and I’ll start.
I side with George Floyd against Derek Chauviin. George Floyd was not committing a violent crime, he was suspected of using a counterfeit bill at a store. Floyd was already handcuffed when Chauvin knelt on his neck, with Floyd pleading that he couldn’t breathe until he was dead. In fact he knelt on his neck even after Floyd was dead.
Derek Chauvin is where he belongs, in prison. I feel nothing but sympathy for George Floyd, who did nothing to deserve the treatment he was given.
Ok, your turn. I know of many examples where I side with the minority individual in high profile confrontations with white individuals, but if i’m right, you will be unwilling to give a single example where you side with the white individual.
Please, prove me wrong.
LoL, as if on cue you are now tapdancing backwards hoping someone else will validate your "position" when you've already proven both where your arguments originate from and why they hold no factual value.
Why would I engage in your bad faith argument when you previously engaged in hypothetical situations too justify the shooting of an 11 year old? Not to mention when you tried to convince yourself it was the minorities fault for defending themselves when police attacked the wrong address.
Bad faith arguments are your only weapon because you lack anything resembling a consistent internal logic.
Next you'll launch into denials and accuse me of either misrepresenting or misunderstanding your previous position, before claiming I'm "refusing to engage" with your bad faith arguments.
LoL
Every one of your arguments has been the equivalent of "but I have black friends"
And then you wonder why no one is impressed by your bad faith arguments.
The only person you can lie to is yourself, my son.
Idgaf! Nothing nor anyone in this world will ever convince me that it is okay to shoot and kill a literal CHILD over a bottle of water. That baby's life was worth more than that and most importantly his life mattered.
Rest in Power Cyrus Carmack Belton 💖
I totally agree with you.
Would you agree that if Cyrus Carmack Belton pointed a loaded 9mm gun at someone, that would justify someone shooting him?
How many politicians have been assassinated by conservatives? Because that number ain't zero.
How.many times have you caucasian conservatives tried to assassinate your own president? Because that numbers not zero.
Tell us about the following people who pointed loaded guns at people.
Kyle Rittenhouse. Daniel Perry. Kenneth Pilon. Robin Westman. Devin Kelley. They were all taken alive after they committed multiple murders, and you started asking what the victims did to "set him off"
Sitting down before you fall down
Ah, Stonehouse, my old friend. I hope you are well. I'll gladly answer your questions as soon as you answer mine.
Weird how you assume he deserved being shot in the back. Normally a sign of someone leaving.
It sounds suspiciously like you are advocating for the execution of any "open-carry" proponents.
Its adorable that you only ever ask "what if he deserved it" when the dead body is a minority.
Sitting down before younfall down, idiot
I haven't assumed anything. I agreed with OP that nothing could convince me that a child deserves to be shot over a bottle of water.
I then posed a hypothetical question, which no one has answered. I doubt if you'll answer, but I'll pose my hypothetical question again.
Would you agree that if Cyrus Carmack Belton pointed a loaded 9mm gun at someone, that would justify someone shooting him?
Should George Zimmerman have faced death for stalking and assaulting a child? Because you applauded him.
Should Kyle Rittenhouse have been executed after he was observed threatening people with a rifle multiple times? Because you applauded him as well.
Ashli Babbitt physically attacked officers and broke into a federal building. You called it "excessive force".
Your question is posed in bad faith. Because you have no consistent internal logic to defend any available answer.
Try harder, dum dum.
It's not at all a bad faith question, I honestly have no idea whether Cyrus Belton pointed his gun at anyone. This is why I pose it as a hypothetical question.
You accuse me of having no consistent internal logic, but I am at least willing to answer questions you pose to me. All I ask is that you do the same and answer my question.
Cool
Then with the earlier examples in mind, tell us why Karmelo Anthony was not allowed comsidered self-defense
Very well, even though you refuse to answer my question, I’ll answer yours. First off, I’d like to see if we can at least agree on the facts of the case. I’ll start with what is known, then move on to what has been reported based on testimony. Karmelo Anthony and Austin were both at a track meet. When it started raining, Anthony took shelter in a tent set up by Metcalf’s team. An argument ensued which resulted in Anthony stabbing Metcalf in the heart. Anthony did not suffer any injuries from the incident. I’ll get into more detail regarding the argument, but are we in agreement of the facts so far?
LoL.
Conveniently leaving out that there were 4 dudes coming at him after multiple run ins in which multiple witnesses identify metcalf as the aggressor.
Your pathological need to Villify ONLY the minority in EVERY case you discuss is a symptom.
Yes, I've left a lot out, i just want to get agreement on the basic facts before we move on to more detail.
Are we in agreement of the basic facts?
Lol, youre following a very familiar pattern.
Cherry picking data to construct a narrative that justifies your racist idealogies. Over yhe years the only argument you haven't made is Phrenology, and even then you have come perilously close to outright eugenics theories.
Every single time its a minority you construct a hypothetical so you can believe that they deserved whatever happened to them, while with caucasians you invariably follow the "23 year old child " line they try to use to excuse people like Brock Turner.
"Bad faith argument" is your only ally, son
I believe you are projecting your own biases onto me, and I think I can demonstrate this. Here's a challenge. You give me an example of a real life, high profile, interracial confrontation where you side with the white person. I’ll give you a real life, high profile, interracial confrontation in which I side with the minority. We can do this over and over, and I’ll start.
I side with George Floyd against Derek Chauviin. George Floyd was not committing a violent crime, he was suspected of using a counterfeit bill at a store. Floyd was already handcuffed when Chauvin knelt on his neck, with Floyd pleading that he couldn’t breathe until he was dead. In fact he knelt on his neck even after Floyd was dead.
Derek Chauvin is where he belongs, in prison. I feel nothing but sympathy for George Floyd, who did nothing to deserve the treatment he was given.
Ok, your turn. I know of many examples where I side with the minority individual in high profile confrontations with white individuals, but if i’m right, you will be unwilling to give a single example where you side with the white individual.
Please, prove me wrong.
LoL, as if on cue you are now tapdancing backwards hoping someone else will validate your "position" when you've already proven both where your arguments originate from and why they hold no factual value.
Why would I engage in your bad faith argument when you previously engaged in hypothetical situations too justify the shooting of an 11 year old? Not to mention when you tried to convince yourself it was the minorities fault for defending themselves when police attacked the wrong address.
Bad faith arguments are your only weapon because you lack anything resembling a consistent internal logic.
Next you'll launch into denials and accuse me of either misrepresenting or misunderstanding your previous position, before claiming I'm "refusing to engage" with your bad faith arguments.
Idgaf! Nothing nor anyone in this world will ever convince me that it is okay to shoot and kill a literal CHILD over a bottle of water. That baby's life was worth more than that and most importantly his life mattered.
Rest in Power Cyrus Carmack Belton 💖
I totally agree with you.
Would you agree that if Cyrus Carmack Belton pointed a loaded 9mm gun at someone, that would justify someone shooting him?
How many politicians have been assassinated by conservatives? Because that number ain't zero.
How.many times have you caucasian conservatives tried to assassinate your own president? Because that numbers not zero.
Tell us about the following people who pointed loaded guns at people.
Kyle Rittenhouse. Daniel Perry. Kenneth Pilon. Robin Westman. Devin Kelley. They were all taken alive after they committed multiple murders, and you started asking what the victims did to "set him off"
Sitting down before you fall down
Ah, Stonehouse, my old friend. I hope you are well. I'll gladly answer your questions as soon as you answer mine.
Weird how you assume he deserved being shot in the back. Normally a sign of someone leaving.
It sounds suspiciously like you are advocating for the execution of any "open-carry" proponents.
Its adorable that you only ever ask "what if he deserved it" when the dead body is a minority.
Sitting down before younfall down, idiot
I haven't assumed anything. I agreed with OP that nothing could convince me that a child deserves to be shot over a bottle of water.
I then posed a hypothetical question, which no one has answered. I doubt if you'll answer, but I'll pose my hypothetical question again.
Would you agree that if Cyrus Carmack Belton pointed a loaded 9mm gun at someone, that would justify someone shooting him?
Should George Zimmerman have faced death for stalking and assaulting a child? Because you applauded him.
Should Kyle Rittenhouse have been executed after he was observed threatening people with a rifle multiple times? Because you applauded him as well.
Ashli Babbitt physically attacked officers and broke into a federal building. You called it "excessive force".
Your question is posed in bad faith. Because you have no consistent internal logic to defend any available answer.
Try harder, dum dum.
It's not at all a bad faith question, I honestly have no idea whether Cyrus Belton pointed his gun at anyone. This is why I pose it as a hypothetical question.
You accuse me of having no consistent internal logic, but I am at least willing to answer questions you pose to me. All I ask is that you do the same and answer my question.
Cool
Then with the earlier examples in mind, tell us why Karmelo Anthony was not allowed comsidered self-defense
Very well, even though you refuse to answer my question, I’ll answer yours. First off, I’d like to see if we can at least agree on the facts of the case. I’ll start with what is known, then move on to what has been reported based on testimony. Karmelo Anthony and Austin were both at a track meet. When it started raining, Anthony took shelter in a tent set up by Metcalf’s team. An argument ensued which resulted in Anthony stabbing Metcalf in the heart. Anthony did not suffer any injuries from the incident. I’ll get into more detail regarding the argument, but are we in agreement of the facts so far?
LoL.
Conveniently leaving out that there were 4 dudes coming at him after multiple run ins in which multiple witnesses identify metcalf as the aggressor.
Your pathological need to Villify ONLY the minority in EVERY case you discuss is a symptom.
Yes, I've left a lot out, i just want to get agreement on the basic facts before we move on to more detail.
Are we in agreement of the basic facts?
Lol, youre following a very familiar pattern.
Cherry picking data to construct a narrative that justifies your racist idealogies. Over yhe years the only argument you haven't made is Phrenology, and even then you have come perilously close to outright eugenics theories.
Every single time its a minority you construct a hypothetical so you can believe that they deserved whatever happened to them, while with caucasians you invariably follow the "23 year old child " line they try to use to excuse people like Brock Turner.
"Bad faith argument" is your only ally, son
I believe you are projecting your own biases onto me, and I think I can demonstrate this. Here's a challenge. You give me an example of a real life, high profile, interracial confrontation where you side with the white person. I’ll give you a real life, high profile, interracial confrontation in which I side with the minority. We can do this over and over, and I’ll start.
I side with George Floyd against Derek Chauviin. George Floyd was not committing a violent crime, he was suspected of using a counterfeit bill at a store. Floyd was already handcuffed when Chauvin knelt on his neck, with Floyd pleading that he couldn’t breathe until he was dead. In fact he knelt on his neck even after Floyd was dead.
Derek Chauvin is where he belongs, in prison. I feel nothing but sympathy for George Floyd, who did nothing to deserve the treatment he was given.
Ok, your turn. I know of many examples where I side with the minority individual in high profile confrontations with white individuals, but if i’m right, you will be unwilling to give a single example where you side with the white individual.
Please, prove me wrong.
LoL, as if on cue you are now tapdancing backwards hoping someone else will validate your "position" when you've already proven both where your arguments originate from and why they hold no factual value.
Why would I engage in your bad faith argument when you previously engaged in hypothetical situations too justify the shooting of an 11 year old? Not to mention when you tried to convince yourself it was the minorities fault for defending themselves when police attacked the wrong address.
Bad faith arguments are your only weapon because you lack anything resembling a consistent internal logic.
Next you'll launch into denials and accuse me of either misrepresenting or misunderstanding your previous position, before claiming I'm "refusing to engage" with your bad faith arguments.
Idgaf! Nothing nor anyone in this world will ever convince me that it is okay to shoot and kill a literal CHILD over a bottle of water. That baby's life was worth more than that and most importantly his life mattered.
Rest in Power Cyrus Carmack Belton 💖
I totally agree with you.
Would you agree that if Cyrus Carmack Belton pointed a loaded 9mm gun at someone, that would justify someone shooting him?
How many politicians have been assassinated by conservatives? Because that number ain't zero.
How.many times have you caucasian conservatives tried to assassinate your own president? Because that numbers not zero.
Tell us about the following people who pointed loaded guns at people.
Kyle Rittenhouse. Daniel Perry. Kenneth Pilon. Robin Westman. Devin Kelley. They were all taken alive after they committed multiple murders, and you started asking what the victims did to "set him off"
Sitting down before you fall down
Ah, Stonehouse, my old friend. I hope you are well. I'll gladly answer your questions as soon as you answer mine.
Weird how you assume he deserved being shot in the back. Normally a sign of someone leaving.
It sounds suspiciously like you are advocating for the execution of any "open-carry" proponents.
Its adorable that you only ever ask "what if he deserved it" when the dead body is a minority.
Sitting down before younfall down, idiot
I haven't assumed anything. I agreed with OP that nothing could convince me that a child deserves to be shot over a bottle of water.
I then posed a hypothetical question, which no one has answered. I doubt if you'll answer, but I'll pose my hypothetical question again.
Would you agree that if Cyrus Carmack Belton pointed a loaded 9mm gun at someone, that would justify someone shooting him?
Should George Zimmerman have faced death for stalking and assaulting a child? Because you applauded him.
Should Kyle Rittenhouse have been executed after he was observed threatening people with a rifle multiple times? Because you applauded him as well.
Ashli Babbitt physically attacked officers and broke into a federal building. You called it "excessive force".
Your question is posed in bad faith. Because you have no consistent internal logic to defend any available answer.
Try harder, dum dum.
It's not at all a bad faith question, I honestly have no idea whether Cyrus Belton pointed his gun at anyone. This is why I pose it as a hypothetical question.
You accuse me of having no consistent internal logic, but I am at least willing to answer questions you pose to me. All I ask is that you do the same and answer my question.
Cool
Then with the earlier examples in mind, tell us why Karmelo Anthony was not allowed comsidered self-defense
Very well, even though you refuse to answer my question, I’ll answer yours. First off, I’d like to see if we can at least agree on the facts of the case. I’ll start with what is known, then move on to what has been reported based on testimony. Karmelo Anthony and Austin were both at a track meet. When it started raining, Anthony took shelter in a tent set up by Metcalf’s team. An argument ensued which resulted in Anthony stabbing Metcalf in the heart. Anthony did not suffer any injuries from the incident. I’ll get into more detail regarding the argument, but are we in agreement of the facts so far?
LoL.
Conveniently leaving out that there were 4 dudes coming at him after multiple run ins in which multiple witnesses identify metcalf as the aggressor.
Your pathological need to Villify ONLY the minority in EVERY case you discuss is a symptom.
Yes, I've left a lot out, i just want to get agreement on the basic facts before we move on to more detail.
Are we in agreement of the basic facts?
Lol, youre following a very familiar pattern.
Cherry picking data to construct a narrative that justifies your racist idealogies. Over yhe years the only argument you haven't made is Phrenology, and even then you have come perilously close to outright eugenics theories.
Every single time its a minority you construct a hypothetical so you can believe that they deserved whatever happened to them, while with caucasians you invariably follow the "23 year old child " line they try to use to excuse people like Brock Turner.
"Bad faith argument" is your only ally, son