
Love Begins
trying on a metaphor
I'd rather be in outer space šø
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year

⣠Chile in a Photography ā£
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
NASA

if i look back, i am lost

#extradirty
No title available
Monterey Bay Aquarium

Origami Around
No title available

ellievsbear
Show & Tell
EXPECTATIONS

shark vs the universe
official daine visual archive

No title available
Jules of Nature
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Lithuania
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Türkiye

seen from Türkiye
seen from United States
seen from Russia
seen from France
@sufferingandasense
sighhhhhhh sure would be a shame if i showed my new casper photocard (thatisntproperlydecoratedyetbecauseihaventfoundanystickers) which was drawn by @axelotlkaui ššš and people saw how obsessed i am with him sighhhhhhhhhh
OUHHHhhh there it goes š and i deffo didnt buy him charms and ignored my budgeting obligations ,,,, ouhhmygodd..
every miku is canonā¦..
With my hands, I created what no man's mind or woman's womb could ever hope to achieve. This is blasphemy!
ok so the pitch is like, the myth of prometheus but they're both girls and- no, prometheus and the eagle. yeah. they're both women and they're gay and the eagle sucks her off crazy style. no its just a regular eagle, why? i mean she can talk and consent and everything. prometheus is the one who lowkey can't consent on account of being tied to a rock and all. anyway the eagle sucks her off and- no i mean her guts still get eaten its just after the beakjob, and it's symbolic and shit
everyone shut da fuck up this is the only thing that matters
Oh My God Damn
very š„°š„°š„° when musicians leave bits in songs where they're saying 'is this thing on?' or 'it's still recording y'know.' chairs scraping, retuning guitars, saying 'let's do that bit again', 'was that take any good?'
idk man sometimes i like it when video game writers are allowed to plan a series of events that happen in a specific order and affect each other in turn to become an overarching narrative, and i donāt mind trusting those writers to take me through those events in the order that is emotionally effective. i donāt really care if a game forces me to go through the forest area first before i can attempt the icy area because maybe thereās things that happen in the forest area that inform later scenes in the icy area. maybe we don't need more superficial player choice open world concepts if it comes at the cost of the ability to write a story with actual significant plot events and character development in each section
omg please (only if you want of course) expand on what you said about omegaverse being Wrong about dog sex
well there's a few different things but here's my primary objections, based on my personal experience assisting with dog breeding:
- knotting itself REALLY does not seem fun for most dogs (Glimmer disagrees but she is. an outlier in my experience.) they definitely are compelled to mate, and I think that must be enjoyable, but once the tie happens most dogs are immediately like "goddammit" and just stand around in a state of chagrined regret for twenty minutes. the most extreme version of post nut clarity. some of them REALLY hate it and you have to grab the bitch to prevent her from trying to run off with the dog's dick still in there bc she could potentially really hurt him. so there is a lot of comedy potential there imo. firstly you're stuck together for half an hour and it's deeply inconvenient. what if one of you needs to get up and grab something off the dresser. imagine the stupid little shuffling walk they'd have to do. and then also imagine if there was a very real danger that someone would freak out and try to Escape your dick in a blind panic and you'd have to try to keep them calm so they didn't give you some sort of dick injury? very funny.
- on a more social implications level, I think it is cowardly to not do a left hand of darkness thing where when someone ISN'T in heat, sex simply Does Not Occur. Ever. as in it is physiologically*not possible* to have sex outside of heats, and no one has any interest in it. that would change human society SO much & is a really fascinating world building scenario, imo, and I think it's really weaksauce that ppl aren't exploring it. heat cycles exist because of a very very different model of ovulation cycles that result in pretty extreme physiological and therefore social differences re: sex, and I think that's interesting to think about in terms of human social structures and how much they would be changed if our reproductive cycles worked more like dogs!
anyway. obvious disclaimer that I have not Read Every Omegaverse Fic and I'm sure some people are exploring things thoughtfully because the world is full of a diversity of human experiences. but IN GENERAL, in the most prevalent media depictions, there is a profound intellectual laziness that I simply cannot respect. i understand that it's just about being horny. but please can't ppl try to be horny in a more thoughtful and interesting way. incurious horniness is nothing to me
I was googling pictures of foxes and found this one. It has definitely made a good attempt at ruining sexy fox fics for me. Look at them. They hate their lives. They're making the world's worst small talk. They are both imagining how great it will be to go home to their own bed. They are counting down the seconds.
YOU GET IT!!!!!!
Hey, Im the train. I decided it would be fun to stop moving for an undisclosed amount of time just before we arrive at the station. My idea..
GRRR DOUBLE POST anywho I redid this fun lil drawing from 2024! Now updated with my most current and actively used OCs!
~ Characters ft.:
Lucas Greene
Quinn M. Maverick
Lani Harwood
Samual Porter
~ Original version below!
Squishy David
With age, he became softer around the edges, much to Angelās delight
They genuinely didnāt think he could be hotter than he already was, but they were sorely mistaken
His chest is softer and more comfortable for Angel to lay their head on
His abs are juuuust barely there, making way for a soft tummy and the perfect amount of squish for Angel to really feel like they can grab him when they wrap their arms around his waist. Before it was rock solid and they had to really cling onto him to keep their arms around him. But now itās like they melt into each otherās embrace, and Angel loves the feeling
His thunder thighs are squishy too. He still has the muscle, but itās rounded out a lot more and so Angel will lay their head on his lap every chance they get
David had cake before, but now heās got a whole bakery back there. He had to size up his jeans just to fit everything, both back and front, in. š
Heās got that Leon Kennedy handsome face, and paired with his hot, sexy, āI can protect you but Iāll also eat cookiesā type body, Angel feels like they get blinded every time they look at him. Heās too radiant
Ofc he still has HUGE biceps, but now Angel can squish it more and they make good pillows for when heās spooning them
His smile lines are deep - much more prominent than before. It almost makes Angel cry when they think about how he rarely smiled back then, and then look at his face and sees his smile carved into his face, especially when he looks at them
@moonkissedyaz š© Iāve been thinking about him all day
you would NEVER believe what I saw on my frickin feed.
ITS LITERALLY HIM AHHHH š¤¤š¤¤š¤¤
Fire Lord Zuko š„
i know you JUST did porter but may i ask for more of him with his hair down.. š³
Lolll. Sure thing. A lil hair down drawing, just for you ā¤ļøš¤
I can imagine him saying somethinā like: āIāll have to keep this preference in mind, Treasureāā
outta curiosity.
How do YOU prefer Porterās hair?
Up in the lil ponytail!
Down š
bald. take his hair privileges away.
So, lately I've been finding myself feeling... annoyed with very modern reimaginings of Greek myths being presented as like the "secretly TRUE versions of the myths before they were warped by the patriarchy."
Like, I don't really have an issue with #GirlBoss Persephone retellings (even if I find them a bit tired because they so often have to rely on villifying Demeter to do so.) But to act like that very modern interpretation of the character and story has any basis in the classical sources is just untrue, and it is frustrating because it refuses to engage with the difficult or uncomfortable aspects of stories that are 3000 years old. It refuses to engage with the cultural differences and history of these stories that still find ways to speak to us today. Instead it just seeks to sanitize and erase the bits that don't fit into our modern sensibilities.
But the one that *really* gets me is Medusa. Because as modern audiences, the idea that Medusa being turned into a monster was *punishment* by Athena for being *raped* by Poseidon is really upsetting. And I've seen people legitimately try to say that *actually* Athena would never do that. Athena was actually *protecting* Medusa by making her a monster so that she wouldn't be assaulted again. #feminism
But HERES THE THING- the entire idea that Medusa was transformed by Athena after being raped? COMES FROM FUCKING OVID.
(Ovid is a Roman writer who HEAVILY REIMAGINED the Greek myths in Metamorphoses because he was working with a Roman world view and political agenda.)
All EARLIER classical (and actually Greek) sources have Medusa being *born a Gorgon.* (whether the Gordons as a rule are beautiful or monsterous varies, and Hesoid does mention in the Theogny that Poseidon and Medusa had a thing, but he doesn't describe it as rape. But that they "lay in a meadow of soft flowers", and theres no description of her being transformed because of this.)
So like.
No.
no.
Obviously, the idea that there is some "true" Canon Orthodox version of these myths just...isn't true. That's just not how that worked.
But no. There is no classical support for any of that.
Thanks.
Side note- speaking of myths that have Athena just wildly lashing out at people- Ovid also may have just... invented the myth of Arachne.
We have 1 reference to Arachne that predates Ovid, from Virgil (Also Roman), and he doesn't name her. "The spider, hateful to Minerva, hangs in the doorway her loose-woven nets."
There is no surviving earlier Greek references or even Greek art depicting Arachne at all, at least that I can find reference to. š¤·āāļø
Which, again, there is no "Greek Mythology Orthodoxy" or anything. Buuuuuuut.
So I just want to let yall know how deep of a rabbit hole I have fallen down.
So here is the question- did Ovid, or at least Romans around Ovids time if not Ovid directly, invent the myth of Arachne? Does it have any basis in Greek oral tradition at all?
And the answer seems to be...we have no idea. The lack of art seems particularly weird to me, right?
But like, ok, I found 1 website (a museum IN GREECE) that claims to have 1 vase from 500BCE which depicts the myth of Arachne.
But this is the vase.
Here is a scan of that image
... why has this been identified as Arachne and Athena? One of the women is larger (the one they have identified as Athena) but she doesn't have any of Athenas traditional iconography- the helmet the shield, even an owl. Anything. And why is that Arachne? There's no spiders, and the tapestry isn't detailed enough for illustrations to be seen. Unless I'm missing something, this is just a scene of 2 women weaving. Maybe with some funky proportions. Why not say it is Penelope and one of her slave girls? Or anyone else? Weaving was pretty popular.
But this isn't a well known or well studied piece. And I'm not an archeologist. What do I know?
But having proof of the Arachne myth from a Greek source in 500BCE would be super interesting, yeah?
So. What do you do when you're hyper-fixating at 11:30pm on an unknowable historical question?
I emailed the museum and asked.
I'll let you know if I find anything interesting.
So it's been a few months, and...to the best of my knowledge, this is just where we stand on this.
The museum never got back to me. I posed this question to a classics professor on TikTok who said basically the same thing - the references from Virgil and this specific vase seem to imply that there was *some* version of the myth that existed before Ovid.
But even he was like "...yeah, they are identifying this vase as Arachne but... it seems a bit speculative."
He also added that Arachne having a Greek name, not a Latin one, makes it more likely that Ovid was adapting something rather than just making it up himself (since he otherwise might have just used a Latin name?)
So. Unless someone digs up another villa or temple at some point and finds new evidence.... this is just... the state of things.
Which is kind of frustrating, but still very cool. If anything, it kinda hammers home HOW we, as modern audiences, know about these myths, how much of that tradition has been lost to time, and how we always need to be thoughtful about our sources and what assumptions we make based on them.
I find the assumption this weaving scene represents the competition of Athena and Arachne odd, to say the least, so I did some research.
Here is the description of Object CP 2038 by Gladys Davidson Weinberg and Saul S. Weinberg (1956):
See also: Williams, Charles Kaufman, J. Lawrence Angel, Peter Burns, and Joan E. Fisher. āCorinth, 1972: The Forum Area.ā Hesperia: The Journal of the American School of Classical Studies at Athens 42, no. 1 (1973): p. 13. https://doi.org/10.2307/147469.
Here's the description of the same vase from ASCSA: (https://ascsa.net/id/corinth/object/cp%202038)
woman to rt., weaving at vertical loom; long hair to below waist, wearing chiton and necklace; holds 2 rods. At rt. 2nd woman facing lt., standing on stool (?) with shorter hair, unbelted garment, holding 2 forked tools against loom. Loom: 2 uprights and horizontal cross-bar, loomweights holding warp threads, length of woven cloth at top with incised cross-hatching. Surface damaged to rt. of her: 3rd woman facing lt., possibly holding loomweights; 4th woman, very tall facing rt.; small 5th woman facing 4th; behind, 2nd loom like 1st.
As OP notes, there's nothing in this scene to relate it to the contest between Arachne and Athena. There are two looms and five women weaving, one of whom is apparently a child who has to stand on a stool to reach the weft.
Also, an aryballos is a container for perfume. It's hard to understand why such an object would be decorated with a cautionary tale, but makes better sense if the decoration is a domestic scene of women of various ages performing the normal household task of weaving.
I think that the Weinberg's interpretation of this scene is inaccurate.
I checked a few websites (the perseus.tufts.edu Art & Archaeology Artifact Browser, The Beazley Archive Pottery Database, the British Museum, and Wikimedia Commons - okay, not exhaustive, but still) and the only ancient depiction of the contest I could find is a frieze of Arachne and Minerva from the Forum of Nerva (built 85 - 97 C.E):
"Rome, Forum of Nerva, so-called "Colonnacce", detail of the frieze, scene with Arachne's punishment." Image source: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:RomaForoNervaColonnacceFregio2cAracne.jpg Image license: Creative CommonsĀ Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
Interesting commentary on this section of the frieze and Ovid's myth here: https://penelope.uchicago.edu/~grout/encyclopaedia_romana/imperialfora/nerva/colonnacce.html
Good investigative work, OP!
If it's any consolation, I emailed a museum to ask about a particular object several years ago (it had been repatriated from the Getty and I was hoping they a photo) and never heard back from them, either.
Thank you! That's both validating and weirdly frustrating that this is the only Pre-Ovid depiction of the myth, and that it's so inconclusive at that.
I'm so interested in what the pre-Ovid version of this myth might have been like. His adaptations have a very specific thematic slant to them- the cruelty and foolishness of the powerful. As thinly veiled critiques of the political elite, he wasn't shy about radically changing the myths to suit that purpose.
So what would an Arachne story *without* that political goal be?
Thinking about this again.
I wish I could sit down with someone who identified that vase as an Arachne/Athena depiction and just....ask them.
Why was this identified as Arachne and Athena instead of, say Penelope and her slave girls? Which would seem to make more sense with some of the details?
i do in hindsight really love the concept of complaining about adaptational changes in a 3000 year old oral tradition of which there isnāt really a definitive version so much as a surviving one that is also the most adapted story of all time. my chud forebears in Roman Britain throwing rocks at a bard going nah nah nah the last one said some different other shit at that part you gotta do it again is a comforting image to me