Lets Have Some Fun Tonight!! Tell Me Your Unpopular Opinions About Hellenic Polytheism, the Greek Gods, Greek Mythology, and Ancient Greece! 😁👍🏻
Here’s a few:
The dichotomy between mythology (totally just ancient fanfic) and cultus (the Actual Truth™ about Hellenic polytheism) doesn’t exist. Myths were part of cultus and people absolutely believed in them. A lot of people just can’t fathom something being both religiously informative and not literal gospel truth at the same time. Also, many people try to distance themselves from Ancient Greek misogyny, slavery, abuse (etc) by discrediting mythology; a far healthier approach, in my opinion, would be to recognise that myths hold both religious value and deeply flawed and harmful beliefs inherent to Ancient Greek society. It’s possible to appreciate the former while condemning the latter.
Similarly, the polarisation of views about Ancient Greece (and ancient civilisations in general) between “they were all horrible and irredeemable” and “some people were horrible but actually the religion was matriarchal and peaceful and racism didn’t exist and imperialism was invented by the Romans” is just as incorrect as it is harmful. We can acknowledge the flaws in a society without focusing only on them, or glossing over them. This is particularly important when studying ancient history. Painting an entire society as irredeemable, or claiming it was utopian, both imply there is nothing worth studying and learning from it.
The actual dichotomy, in my opinion, should be between religion and philosophy. Platonism isn’t Hellenic polytheism; it’s the beliefs of one specific Athenian man and his followers. That doesn’t mean philosophy wasn’t heavily influenced by religion (it was), nor does it mean you can’t follow a certain philosophy if it suits you, but reading The Symposium won’t provide you with the Actual Truth™ about the Gods as most Ancient Greeks viewed them.
Speaking of which, there is no Actual Truth™ about the Gods.
Just because you don’t like Homer and just because his epics have been over-studied doesn’t mean there isn’t value in them. Especially for recons whose practise isn’t rooted in 5th century Athens.
Revivalists need to understand that reconstructionism isn’t about inflexibly copying everything the Ancient Greeks did and nothing else. It’s about seeking historical precedent first and foremost, doing one’s best to understand the context behind ancient practises, then adapting it all to the modern world and filling in the gaps with innovation/UPG. What makes the difference between recons and revivalists is prioritisation: both groups use ancient sources and modern innovation, but recons prioritise ancient sources whereas revivalists prioritise modern innovation.
It shouldn’t be okay to insult deities. Disagree with their portrayal by certain authors, sure (hello, Ovid). Point out that certain myths are the product of bigoted and harmful societal views, absolutely. But if you genuinely think that Zeus, Hera or Poseidon is villainous, you shouldn’t be a Hellenic polytheist.
Believing that the Gods are neither perfect nor all-powerful does not equal believing that they are villainous.
Zeus is a wonderful Sky Papa whom I love, and that is a hill I will die on.















