"I have no idea what I'm doing, and I never will!" Hello I'm Kim, aka SupaGoGoMan, aka A Guy Named Kim Who Isn't Korean. Here I will blog about random things about myself or VIDEO GAMES but for the most part it's dumb reblogs now. Feel free to ask dumb questions.
My thoughts on the Star Fox 2026 announcement (Why do they look like that?)
The other day, Nintendo dropped a surprise announcement in the form of a Nintendo Direct stream almost out of nowhere. The big reveal? A brand new Star Fox game. The catch? It's a remake of Star Fox 64, taking the exact same levels from the original game from 1997 and adding a modern graphical overhaul. Immedietly the internet was abuzz with hot takes and opinions, mostly focused on two main issues:
Why another remake?
and
Oh god why do they look like that?
Well, as a bit of a Star Fox fan myself, I guess I will too will give my thoughts on the matter and throw them into the pile of other internet opinions. Let's begin with the new look:
Oh god why do they look like that?
I think it was a bold decision to put Fox McCloud in the new Mario Galaxy movie, and also include the entire animated short giving the backstory of Fox McCloud and his crew from said movie at the start of the direct (thank you, Miyamoto, for doing that btw, hearing they had a 2D Star Fox animation was the only thing that interested me about the Galaxy movie and now that they showed that part in the direct I don't need to see the movie anymore), and then immedietly after show the new designs of the crew just to make the contrast between the two designs even more drastic and jarring.
DLSS5 off vs DLSS5 on.
They've clearly gone more "realistic" with the designs, and on first impression it's a little uncanny, especially with the human-like eyes. The most noticable things are their faces, but also their feet, both of which are more closer to the original animals they're based off of. For me, the legs are probably the part I find the most contentious. I would argue their fancy space boots were a pretty iconic part of their design (they even mention the boots specifically in the Mario Galaxy Movie!!), but now their animal feet no longer fit into regular human-like shoes. Even going by fantasy space furry designs, I feel like these are pretty unusual. I'm no furry, but I've seen many a furry drawing during my time on the internets and even I know that, normally, furries emphasize the size of the feet or elongate the legs for these kinds of characters, so Fox in particular feels pretty stumpy.
If you crop out everything below the belt he's actually pretty cool.
Falco now has actual bird feet, and he looks a little shrimpy in this particular shot.
Imagine the sounds as he clacks around the Great Fox on his freakish bird talons.
It's not even consistent either. Slippy, for some reason, still seems to have the normal shoes. Real frogs have pretty long legs, so Slippy is the only one so far that feels a bit stylized and cartoony compared to the others, which feels incongruent with the rest of the cast.
Slippy: "mom I frew up"
Dispite these issues I have, I think I have already grown to the new designs and I don't dislike them. My immediete reaction to the direct was one of mild disgust but after seeing some of the key art renders I think the designs aren't too bad, with the potential to show a lot of personality. I'll probably have to see them in motion a bit more before I can form a full opinion.
I guess it doesn't matter too much, though, as most of the time they'll be stuck in the cockpits anyway and you won't be looking at disgusting furry feet whilst actually playing the game. While playing Star Fox 64 it's not like I was sitting there thinking constantly "Gee I sure wish I could see their feet".
It's another remake!?!?
I also wasn't thinking "Gee I wish I could play Star Fox 64 but with more cutscenes" but that's apparently what Nintendo is cooking up with this release. It's the exact same games and levels, but with overhauled graphics and additional cutscenes between missions. I feel like if something like this was announced during, say, the GameCube days, when new graphics were actually impressive, when we were wowed with the Resident Evil 1 remake and were all aiming for games to be more cinematic, this would have held a bit more appeal to me, but I can't help but feel lukewarm about the announcement because it is the same game I've replayed a billion times. Star Fox 64 is an arcade style game, designed to be replayed multiple times to aim for high scores. Arcade style games normally avoid long cutscenes to avoid disrupting the flow of the game play, so for me, these cutscenes will probably be viewed once then skipped every single time henceforth.
And let's face it, if you're a Star Fox fan, you're likely a fan because of Star Fox 64. It's the one game everyone universally likes (along with the SNES Star Fox game maybe). If you're a super hardcore fan, you've probably bought the game again on Virtual Console, on the Switch online service. Maybe you even played the 3DS port, or even tried that decomp. By now, you know the game like the back of your hand, have perfected your runs and know the best routes and tricks to get the highest score, have all the medals, and are probably starving for a sequel with NEW levels to sink your teeth into, but if this is a true remake then you probably won't be getting that itch scratched any time soon as it'll be the same levels again. Say what you will about Star Fox Zero, a game universally slammed for it's motion controls and rehashed story, but at least that game had new levels and remixed concepts.
Perhaps I can understand the appeal of doing another remake, though. It is THE Star Fox game that people like. It's the one with the memes everyone remembers. Every other game since then has struggled to recapture the original appeal. I even remember back in the day, people would complain that we never got a proper sequel that was in the classic on-rails style of Star Fox 64, so going back to that probably makes some sense from a marketing perspective, at least in the view to bring in new fans of the series and roping in the new interest drummed up by the Mario Galaxy Movie. That said, I think most people would have preferred a game in the style of Star Fox 64 but with new levels, instead of literally the same game again.
To me, this feels like a lost opportunity to use aspects they could take from other games to enhance the experience. On top of adding new stages, they could implement the mechanics from Star Fox Zero, which I felt were a pretty good evolution of that from 64. Like 64, where using charge shots nets bonus points, Zero also let you earn bonus points from shooting downed enemies again. The charge shot also was more powerful if a shot was fired the moment a lock on activated, and hyper lazers allowed you to lock on to two enemies at once. These would probably fit nicely into any new Star Fox game, but as these are new mechanics that were not part of the original game, we'll likely see these mechanics tossed out, which is a bit of a shame.
Maybe this reboot will work this time?
Star Fox Zero was intended to be a reboot for the franchise. After Star Fox Command, a game with like a billion different story endings, it probably makes sense to go back to basics. The Zero reboot never went anywhere though, I wonder wh-
Oh...
These days I'm pretty jaded on remakes and re-releases, I'm old enough to have played most of em when they came out. I have no desire to play Silent Hill 2, Resident Evil 4 remake or MGS3 Delta, because I still own the originals of those games and can readily play them at any time I desire.
That being said, I do hope this new Star Fox sells well. If it does, we can hope to enjoy sequels that build upon the mechanics of the game with new levels, new story and new characters. If it bombs, well I guess we'll see another remake in ten years or so.
On another note, when all the twitch streamers start becoming Star Fox vtubers using the game chat feature, know that I was doing it first.
*Wriggling around on the lab floor* I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute. I’m so cute.
Trying to move to Linux Mint - aka Dumb Moron tries to avoid using Windows 11 for as long as possible
Recently I've been making the gradual transition to move from Windows to using Linux. This is something that I'd been meaning to do for some time but always put off because I was lazy. However, the official end of Windows 10 support and all the bad things I'd been hearing about Windows 11 had me thinking it was probably best to make the switch sooner rather than later.
As someone who'd used been sticking with Windows since Windows 95, it was a little daunting moving over. I've essentially had the 'same' PC since my student days in 2007 - not literally the same PC, but my files and system have stayed pretty much since I built my first PC all those years ago and moving to a new operating system would be a big change up to my usual work flow.
Still, about a year ago I finally decided to install Linux Mint, which I heard was a pretty good Windows-like system and worked pretty well as Baby's First Linux. I've been hopping on and off it since about a year ago, and right now I am happy to report my Linux set up is more or less set up for daily use. It wasn't exactly a smooth journey, though. There were a couple of issues that I haven't yet managed to overcome, and I kind of felt like rambling about it a bit.
The PCI Capture Card saga
In the past, I used to have a PCI capture card that had S-video and composite input. This is how I used to capture footage from my consoles back in the day, and how I recorded some of my old Youtube videos - from capturing Monster Hunter 3 footage from my Wii, to recording my playthroughs of Shenmue 1 and 2 for my old Let's Play, that little thing certainly brought life to my YouTube "career". At some point, I did an overhaul of my setup and got a new motherboard, and unfortunately this board lacked the regular PCI slots needed for this device - it only had those smaller PCI-e slots. So I went and purchased a different capture card that was compatible. Bad news, though - it didn't have S-video input, and for some reason it only supported PAL50Hz input.
Why did I give all this background? Well in my testing of Linux Mint, I tested the capture card and to my pleasant surprise it seemed to work completely fine in OBS - no need to fiddle with drivers or propriety software, it worked right out of the box. Not only that, I noticed it was giving me the option to record in 60hz! Splendid! So I recorded some footage of the PS2 Transformers game for a bit as a test, recording in lovely 60hz, only for the capture card to, seemingly, stop working all together. What happened? Did I break it? Was it never intended to record in 60hz? Maybe there was a reason that, on Windows, I wasn't permitted to record in 60hz? Whatever the reason, I no longer have a capture card capable of recording analogue video. Oops!
I Just Wanted to Draw Anime Titties
As you may or may not know, I infrequently draw things digitally, and for the past few years I've been drawing using Clip Studio Paint. Unfortunately, CSP does not have native Linux support (I did find a guide to get it working using Wine but I have not tried yet). No worries, though - Krita is an open-source alternative to CSP that works perfectly on Linux and, from what I've tried, is a perfectly cromulent replacement. Yippie!
However, my weapon of choice to draw is an old display pen tablet - an Artisul D13. I purchased this because I was too cheap for a Wacom, and it has served me well. Unfortunately, this does not seem to have support on Linux, only Windows drivers are available. I've had a peruse on forums around and looked at digimend stuff and there doesn't seem to be an easy solution. The issue is, for some reason, the tablet has no pen sensitivity. There are buttons on the side that act as shortcuts for undo-ing actions or scrolling and zooming, and those work fine, but pen sensitivity doesn't. However, I did find a work around - unputting some digimend command line code (sudo uclogic-probe, if you're wondering) somehow prompts the computer into recognizing the tablet properly, causing pen sensitivity to work. Unfortunately, this has the effect of rendering the side buttons non functional, so I resort to having to undo using ctrl-z on the keyboard, and scrolling and zooming on my canvas using the UI buttons like some kind of cave man. It's fine though, these are relatively minor work arounds and I suppose I'd just have to learn to live this this.
Or so I thought, because on a few odd occasions, my tablet just... works... Fully functional, pen sensitivity and working buttons... and I don't know how or why. It doesn't happen often, some days I switch on my computer, log in, and it's working as it should. Most of the time, it doesn't. I don't know how or why. I am clearly too stupid to figure this one out. I will perhaps research more into this at some point but, as you may remember, I am a Linux n00b, I barely understand how to tie my shoelaces.
In conclusion - Goodbye Windows? (Probably not)
Overall, despite the issues above, I'm pretty happy with Mint - it runs every game I've tried on it perfectly fine, it's clean, loads fast, no bloatware, it's great! I'd highly recommend it to anyone interested in getting into Linux but is daunted by the technical side of things. Sadly, I don't think I'll be able to FULLY migrate from Windows - as mentioned, CSP does not have Linux support. My Elgato HD Capture card (which I use to record HDMI) also does not work on Linux. I've also been getting pretty deep into the VRChat rabbit hole these days, and my Bigscreen Beyond 2 headset also seems to be Windows only. For this reason, I'll keep dual booting with Windows for when I want to hit up VRChat or anything else that I can't figure out on Linux.
Hopefully, I'll be using Linux more often from now. Although it hasn't been entirely free of issues, I can't say the journey hasn't been enjoyable. I've actually somewhat enjoyed trouble shooting my issues. I've also found it refreshing having more customization options - I recently found a theme that changes the appearance to make my desktop look like Windows 95. Although I'm not sure I'll keep using it, I did find it very funny, and it also bought back memories I had messing around with desktops on old Windows. Years ago Nintendo released official themes for Windows XP that drastically changed the look of the GUI. I especially liked the Wind Waker theme. You don't really see that kind of fun in any modern system these days, and I think it's a real shame. We all need a little whimsy and fun in our life, and a lot of whimsy can come in the form of garish, obscene desktop themes and dumb looking mouse cursors.
areudirty
kianamaiart
germansingergirl
ellievsbear
dailybridgerton
pixelskylines
yousharknotpass
origamiaround
