Cartoon by https://www.instagram.com/vulgadrawings
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from China
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Canada

seen from France
seen from China

seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from China
Cartoon by https://www.instagram.com/vulgadrawings
Cartoon by https://www.instagram.com/vulgadrawings
AGGRIEVED ENTITLEMENT
looks like this:
[The single panel comic has a pink background. A white man with short brown hair wearing a white collared shirt and black pants is sitting on one end of a wide wooden bench. His arms are crossed and he is staring straight ahead, his legs splayed out to either side wider than his hips. To his right stands a woman with dark hair and brown skin wearing a green vest over a lilac long-sleeved shirt and black shirt. She is gesturing with one hand at the bench, smiling as she looks sideways at it.]
Woman: I THINK I DESERVE TO SIT ON THIS BENCH TOO!
[Below the first drawing, the woman is now sitting on the opposite end of the bench, her hands on her closed knees. She is looking sideways apprehensively at the man who has fallen onto the ground. His arms are flung out and he looks horrified.]
White man: OH MY GOD I'VE BEEN PUSHED OFF! THERE'S NO ROOM FOR ME ON [Underlined text.] MY [End underlined text.] BENCH ANYMORE!
See also: human conversation.
"Men perceived the discussion as being equal when women talked only 15% of the time, and the discussion as being dominated by women if they talked only 30% of the time."
Beyond Angry White Men: a progressive sociological imagination as an alternative to aggrieved entitlement
Is it just me or is there a smack of aggrieved entitlement in the way people complain about seeing "poly and partnered" on dating app profiles?
"I think it’s a false debate. I think nature and nurture are intimately linked. What we know is that testosterone as a hormone both drives aggression and responds to aggression. It is a really malleable hormone. And I think that you can’t understand the natural biological conditions of violence without understanding the social conditions, and I think you can’t understand the social conditions without understanding the biological conditions. Let me give you two examples. The first: how come men use a biological argument when they are angry and they beat up someone smaller or older than they are or they beat their wives – yet they don’t beat their bosses? I mean, my boss would likely piss me off more than my wife would, right? Why don’t I beat him up? Because you have to feel like you have permission. You have to believe that the target of your violence is “legitimate”. There is a famous experiment by a primatologist at Stanford. He takes five monkeys and measures their testosterone. Then he puts the five monkeys in a cage. The monkeys immediately establish a hierarchy of violence – number one beats number two, number two beats number three, number three beats number four, number four beats number five. Of course, number one has the highest testosterone, and so on. So the experiment is: he takes monkey three out of the cage and he shoots him up with testosterone, off the scale, and puts him back in. What do you think happens? When I tell this story my students always guess that he immediately becomes number-one monkey. But that’s not true. What happens is that when he goes back in the cage he still avoids monkeys number one and two – but he beats the shit out of numbers four and five. So what any reasonable biological researcher would conclude is that testosterone does not cause aggression, it enables it. The target of the violence must already be seen as legitimate. You have a biological argument and a sociological argument. So the answer to your question is that it is never either/or. It is always both. Always."
So You Don't Think White Male Privilege Exists?
So You Don’t Think White Male Privilege Exists?
Well, I got two words for you: Ethan Couch. This young white male got away with killing FOUR people while driving drunk. His defense? I’m a wealthy white dude who was raised with complete entitlement so I don’t know the difference between right and wrong.
The fucking judge bought it. Apparently, Ethan Couch is suffering from a new white male disease called Affluenza. He’s got so much privilege…
View On WordPress