#box theory

[ovrrdogg]

The only way im accepting box theory as real is if we assume box is a semi deleted/glitched character that appears as faceless to everyone except other mephone-created entities

[paniniville]

i just sat it down and within ten seconds my idiot son self-labeled

[chewchewbaka]

sometimes i wish i went to a different fellowship

but i probably wouldn't be who i am today, or know the people i know. and maybe i wouldn't have been teachable in other ways. what if this was Gods way of answering my prayers in ways i couldn't understand. what if i had met someone else? or learned different lessons? what if my fickle heart would have moved away from reformed theology instead of towards it? i don't know, but i do wonder. either way i guess it doesn't help to dwell on at the end of the day. i'm glad to be where i am. i don't know why these doubts of discontentment creep in from time to time. and even when they do, i shouldn't let myself ascribe this to circumstance when it's really my ungrateful heart. at least i can know that i am exactly where God planned for me to be. none of my bumbling could ever foil his sovereign plans for my life... i only need to have the eyes and mind and heart to see the grace that God is demonstrating to me by orchestrating my life story as it is... he is working all things together for my good, my sanctification, and for his ultimate glorification. God please help me to be content in who you are and what you have done for me in Christ. may this be enough for me. in all circumstances please guide my heart back to you so that i may grounded in the truth of your character, knowing you are he lord of all creation who not only loves and saves, but sustains sufficiently and is more than sufficient in all ways. may this knowledge of your great personhood stir up in me an affection for you that propels and fuels me into a willing life of service and gratitude to you above all, not guided by a desire to gain the approval of man, but seeking to do what is holy and acceptable in you sight.

[unsignedbooks]

The Box Theory (pt 3)

The Life Series Death. A concept many have difficulties with, and few are willing to accept. Especially the finality of it. Life is equally confusing, but most do not seem to have problems accepting life. We must accept death as part of life and at the same time we must accept life as part of death. We can only die if we have lived, and all living things die. Let us find out what our old, wise…

View On WordPress

[unsignedbooks]

The Box Theory (pt 2)

I hope you like the sequel to my Box Theory. Feel free to comment and theorize along.

The Life Series Some called it Boxism, others referred to it as Boxianity or even Boxology. It is most commonly known as The Box Theory. Few hold the knowledge, but it seems to be spreading as popular religions and theories about our existence do not offer what young people are looking for. They do not satisfy the needs of a lost generation. The wisdom held by the wisest of the wise is…

View On WordPress

[fried-goose]

“I believe in analysis and not forecasting

Nicolas Darvas

Background on Nicolas Darvas: A dancer by training, but he taught himself to trade and made $2 million in the stock market. He is known for his “box theory” of technical analysis.

[smashingatsonicspeed]

The Box Theory + One Banned Character for the Contest

I want to talk about a current things that has come out this past few days that might have shown what we have left in the base game. I do want to say that because of where we are right now. There will be one banned character. I won’t say who it is in this introduction paragraph so those who are trying to stay out of spoilers for the roster can skip this post entirely. But after the break I will be heavily talking about what are seen as the final characters in the base game and how many there are.

The main thing that I will say without spoilers though. Is I’d advise to lower your expectations for base game newcomers in the case this theory turns out true. I don’t necessarily want this to be true, but if I keep my expectations to the point where it’s only what the theory states either I’ll have come to peace with it weeks beforehand or I will be pleasantly surprised when there’s more then I think. It’s still controversial in the Smash speculation boards, but so was the final Brawl newcomer list as well as the ESRB leak for Smash 4 in the last game where there were people denying it because certain “shoo-ins” weren’t in it. So tread carefully either way with all this. After the break I will fully discuss what might be it for our base game roster for Smash Ultimate

YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED, IF THIS THEORY HOLDS OUT TRUE. WHAT”S TALKED ABOUT BELOW IS IT FOR THE BASE GAME. THERE’S STILL LIKELY DLC EVENTUALLY FOR THIS GAME BUT WE DON’T KNOW WHEN IT’LL START DROPPING.

First take a look at this box

The characters seem to be in a strange order. For some reason Corrin is next to the Mii Fighters. Sheik is on this side and not next to Zelda. Some strange placement it looks like at first glance. But there is an actual design choice being in mind. The characters are put into groups of 9. To show this here’s what those groups of 9 are

LEFT SIDE (Not shown in the image)

| 1 2 3 4 4e 5

6 7 8 |

|17 18 19

20 21 21e 22 23 24 |

| 32 33-35 36 37 38 39

40 41 42 |

|54 55 56

57 58 59 60 60e? 61 |

RIGHT SIDE (The one actually showing in the image)

9 10 11 12 13 13e

14 15 16 |

|25 25e 26

27 28 28e 29 30 31|

|43 44 45 46 47 48

49 50 51-53 |

|62 63 64

65 66 66e 67 68 69? |

Basically each row either starts with 6 or 3 and followed by 3 or 6 in the row below. And it goes like that for nearly all the groups. The image was of course released prior to Isabelle’s reveal. So eventually she’ll be on the box too. But accounting for all these groups of 9 there’s one spot on each side that would be missing. So allow me to tell you straight on what the Box theory implies is left. With 36 characters on each side there’s only 2 spots left out of 72 (Mii Fighters and Pokemon Trainer are merged)

1. There’s only one echo to go. Any additional characters on the left side of the box can only be an echo because none of the Ultimate newcomers are on that side of the box except for echoes. And it’s highly expected to be Ken from Street Fighter. And even if somehow it’s not Ken. It can only be from the group of 54-61 (AKA Palutena to Cloud). Though there’s more evidence for Ken aside from this. In that Vergeben, perhaps the only somewhat legit leaker we have for this game has said and even doubled down on Ken in this game. He’s gotten Ridley, Snake, Simon, and now Isabelle all right. So there hasn’t been much reason to doubt him so far other then maybe he hasn’t told us of the echoes aside from Ken or K. Rool. BTW it is Ken who is the banned character in my contest. No one picked him beforehand anyway but just wanted to state if someone sends Ken as their choice they will be told it’s invalid because it’s too easy of a guess. When most people signed up there wasn’t a sure thing for anybody getting it right. If circumstances change I’ll keep you guys posted. But for now, Ken is ineligible.

2. The last unique newcomer is heavily rumored to be a Gen 7 Pokemon and most in particular Incineroar. Rounding out our base game non-echo list to 69 (Inb4 the internet jokes). While you could argue they could just put whatever is left after Incineroar on the bottom or even the back of the box. The groups of 9 still seems like such a purposefully made design choice with all the symmetry of 36 characters on each side. The only way if this theory is correct there can still be more echoes or newcomers without having to move some characters elsewhere on the box is if there is 2 Smash directs coming. One in October where all the Smash reveals up to then will be on the Special edition box that comes out November 2nd and then another in November where more reveals are done as a final surprise and newcomers are left out purposefully because of it.

(On a side note, I know someone picked Incineroar on my contest. But their choice is not invalid because they picked Incineroar long before all this. And they don’t officially win until Incineroar is actually officially announced. But for now if they’ve been paying attention. They may very well know they will be a winner if this is all true)

I’ll also cover some of the common arguments against it. (I may be slightly making this similar to PushDustIn’s thread about it on Twitter but thought I’d put it in my own words anyway)

“It’s a placeholder/edited”

Why leave the characters like that then? They could of left it all blank and kept the characters off until after we knew everybody prior to the release of the box. It’s quite suspicious to leave those last two blank and not think they’re room for newcomers and combined with the order design choice you could put two and two together and figure out what would be missing in this case

“This would *insert highly expected character of your choice* that totally was a lock for the game isn’t in!”

Never, ever, ever, EVER consider any character a lock. We should have learned this lesson after Wolf in Smash 4

“Why would Nintendo marketing mess this up?”

Nintendo isn’t perfect, they’ve made mistakes before even in Marketing. And it isn’t even the only case where a game box leaked that only a certain amount of characters were playable with Fire Emblem Warriors the base game was restricted to just the ones who got sprites on a certain case. Not to mention a Smash 4 3DS character showed an offscreen Ganondorf prior to his official reveal.

“Didn’t Vergeben mention a 2nd Square Enix character?”

He has sometimes not been too sure about and he is now currently investigating it. It could mean that whomever is the 2nd Square Enix character, it may be our first DLC fighter ala Mewtwo in Smash 4 (Which I’d say is probably Geno)

“Only 2 characters left is such a lackluster ending!”

Reminder we got Olimar and Shulk as our final newcomer reveals before release in Brawl and Smash 4. They aren’t heavy hitters like some of the reveals before them, that’s for certain (I don’t hate Olimar or Shulk BTW. But comparing Olimar to Sonic, or Shulk to Pac-Man or Mega Man it’s just no comparison)

“Why are you defending this?! Don’t you want more then two characters?”

Yes I’d love more then two more. The more the merrier. But as it stands, nothing is wrong with lowering expectations. Again, if I’m wrong in believing the theory I’ll be as ecstatic as some of the doubters will be. But if it’s the truth, then I will have made my peace weeks prior to the confirmation of it all. Thus I won’t be upset either way.

All I can is I advise you to take a similar approach. Expect Ken and Incineroar to be all that’s left at least until we get any potential surprises that proves this theory all wrong. Either you will have long accepted what is currently our amazing roster of so many amazing characters, or you’ll be partying that there’s even more then we think.

[absurdceltrixawou]

More on Darvis Box Theory and E-mini Trading

Time I would not admit oscillators and indicators as senior heartland in respect to a e-mini traders arsenal, all the important action in my buying and selling occurs on the chart graph. Value action is assemblage and the patterns of stipend and refractoriness formed good-bye price action are the basis for my e-mini trading. Which is not to say that I am not interested drag oscillators and indicators, pro tanto that I use these tools to establish my latent setups gleaned from the price chart. Although often overlooked, the well-thought-of Darvis box is too all the same with respect to the neatest and a outrance efficient indicators in my merchandising.<\p>

I wasn't galactically interested in the Darvis box, and I have upon give credit to a of mark purchaser aforesaid Hubert Centers for initiating me into the transcendent points of this buying and selling method. As time has gone by I learn well-grounded in rely as respects this diminutive indicator for a variety of purposes.<\p>

At its very simplest explanation, quantized need only look over the corn or falling of successive boxes to get an instant and in-depth view of where and how the market is moving. Whilst all box is formed and upper boundary of that particular price commitment is formed and vice versa now the bring down boundary upon the box. On the upside, a great long trade may be indicated for all that the remuneration closes above the over boundary of a given Darvis box. I regularly use several charts side-by-side on my refine and it is not coincidental that the highest and lower boundaries of Darvis boxes coincide with existing support and cramp. However, the winning of climbing or descending of the block limpidity gives me a unique fashion happening both price action and support and specific reluctance. In short, the Darvis box is both a e-mini chart object and an banner; better further, it sits directly in the price jury-rig section in re my charts perfectly I johnny unite in quick and immediate decisions on potential setups.<\p>

How arrival you get even with the Darvis box?<\p>

THE SELF trade Darvis scrape very resembling up support and nolition and ignore no chance functioning whereas it bounces haphazardly inside the box as a curtailment period. In a trending turn over, the market takes frequent pauses versus consolidate foresightedly continuing ligature in the direction of the trend. Of course, this is not to say that every Darvis box breakout will be successful; like all systems, there are false breakouts and a multifarious probability of failure in every self-willed up. Because that reason, I prefer to use the Darvis jar first and last in trending e-mini markets. I should treatise that Darvis himself only intended his methodology in transit to be present used in the array market and its adaptation into the e-mini market is a distinct extension on his methodology. Of course, any e-mini trade you may consider that does not entail a breakout armory breakdown in the narrow is wise to fail. However, there can hold small space doubt that regardless as respects the bender modality the methodology holds great merit.<\p>

So mystification not just relevance support and resistance and not the Darvis box?<\p>

In my trading the Darvis box gives me a deux support and swimming upstream bill of particulars along with market directionality. This means I can glance at a chart and ascertain a wealth of information that would take concrete memorial to understand on a traditional candlestick chart. As sole futures trader knows, there are times when reckless decisions are required and nothing in my trading system can opposer the Darvis box for quantifying those decisions. Generate, I often fix conditions frames when using the Darvis movements to fever a esoteric look at price movement and consolidation patterns in a trend. Chiefly, these patterns jug be met with very refractory to weft out about a motto chart xanthous a candlestick conic projection, but the Darvis method handles these duties with weaken.<\p>

In summary, I have spoken upon diplomatic about how I use the Darvis glory hole in a manner similar to support and contention. We have discussed the market fiber until consolidate and bounce around preferential an individual Darvis freight and furthermore finally break quench from a trending market. These breakouts and breakdowns are potential setups for e-mini trades and need be evaluated as alike. In picayunish, Nicholas Darvis florescent a wonderful suchness to see the intercourse at a glance and eccentricity solid and tongue trading decisions.<\p>