May the love you give to others return to you multiplied and without conditions.
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Australia
seen from Russia
seen from China
seen from United Kingdom
seen from China

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Romania
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Israel
seen from Italy
seen from Netherlands
seen from Canada
seen from China
May the love you give to others return to you multiplied and without conditions.
CONDITIONAL LOVE
p!yandere roommate x gn!older sibling reader x p!yandere family
TW: implied stalking, sabotage, emotional manipulation, disassociation, unhealthy coping mechanism, mental breakdown, and toxic dynamics.
l.name = last name
f.name = first name
You weren't their first choice.
You weren't their second choice nor third– not even fourth!
You were their last choice. Ironic, no?
Well, of course it was, but it wasn't like you knew… the full extent that is. You had an inkling, but they never confirmed or denied it. Not like they would, that at least you knew for certain, but it was fine, you suppose.
Casual
Choke me.
Rip through skin and tell me that I've earned it.
Turn romance into a dirty secret that secretes mutual disfiguration.
A warm smile that asks to bare teeth to chew through innocence.
And when we're done
Entangled in fluid, regret, and each other
The Holy Trinity
Consensual emotional ruin
Because mutual exclusivity isn't needed in war
Emotionally immature parents often do not treat love as something freely given away. Instead love is something that is earned, maintained, or withdrawn based on how well their child complies with expectations and the parents emotional needs. Immature individuals lack a stable inner sense of self, so they regulate their emotions through other people, especially their children. This quietly turns the relationship into a transaction or contract: you get closeness and approval only if you keep me comfortable.
In these situations, affection appears and disappears based on obedience. When the child agrees, performs, or stays in line, the parent is warm and approving. When the child disagrees, shows independence, or behaves in a way the parent doesn’t approve of the warmth turns into coldness, negative comments or insults, withdrawal, or sulking. The child learns love is not stable and safety depends on staying in the parent’s good graces.
Guilt is a common tool. Phrases like, “After everything I’ve done for you,” or “If you loved me, you wouldn’t do this,” teach the child that autonomy is betrayal and that love is measured by self-sacrifice. loyalty slowly becomes synonymous with self-erasure.
Love is also often tied to roles rather than to the child as a person. The “good” child is the one who complies, helps, and doesn’t challenge the parent’s emotional comfort. The “difficult” child is the one who separates, questions, or grows. Warmth and approval go to the role, not to the real person.
Instead of addressing conflict directly, these parents often use emotional punishment: withdrawing affection, creating tension, or acting hurt until the child gives in. Over time, the child learns a damaging equation: love equals compliance. The deeper problem is that the parent cannot tolerate a relationship with a separate individual. For an emotionally immature parent, love is not about mutual respect, but about maintaining comfort and control through the child’s behavior.
My parents love me so much.
I know they would do anything for me.
I know how much they’ve sacrificed
and tolerated just for me.
And I feel guilty. almost ashamed.
that I will never be the child
they wanted me to be.
How sad it is
to love the idea of your children
but not truly your children.
There are no words to soothe the pain
of our sheer differences.
The stark contrast is evident.
There are no words in the world
to explain to them
that I might be a mistake.
a born devil
for their demise.
love should not cost a thing and if its conditional, then its not love. Love is being gentle and careful
On the subject of monetising hobbies, hustle culture really feeds into the commodification of friendships.
I meet someone at a cooking class, we bond over a metal band and 19th c. literature, and we become friends. Even when we don't share in a particular hobby, both of us are happy to listen to the other talk about it.
Then they publish a self-help book, or start selling dog treats or essential oils for extra income. Our dynamic changes from friends on equal terms to include seller and potential consumer.
Our nonmonetised hobbies, shared or otherwise, the very things that brought us together, are affected, too. Common interests were enough when we were bonding over a free activity, but now there's a price attached, the expectation is that a good friend, someone who cares, will pay it.
Is it enough to buy the ebook instead of the paperback? Do I get a pass on buying dog treats if I don't have a dog? If I have no money but I tell five or ten or thirty people about their essential oil range, am I being supportive? If I buy a similar product elsewhere, even if I'd been doing so for years before we even met, am I actively sabotaging their livelihood?
Am I a good enough friend? Am I a good enough consumer?