#cupio

[luminousluxanna]

Pride Userboxes Ი ᰍ ݃ ݁ᣟ݂

࣪ ִֶָ☾. Happy Pride Month - Pride Userboxes ݁ ˖Ი𐑼⋆

࣪ ִֶָ☾. 𖹭 + ⟲ if you use ݁ ˖Ი𐑼⋆

࣪ ִֶָ☾. Credit appreciated but not needed ݁ ˖Ი𐑼⋆

࣪ ִֶָ☾. Do not repost ݁ ˖Ი𐑼⋆

࣪ ִֶָ☾. Link back to me if asked ݁ ˖Ი𐑼⋆

[whimsy-flags]

Cupiosexual and Genderfae emojis for @sentientvolcano! Enjoy :3

[chaosisorderao3]

Made a zine fuelled by my sheer spite at the aphobic gatekeeping I keep witnessing

[gray-ace-space]

advice for my acespecs struggling with impostor syndrome: whenever you start to doubt your asexuality, all you have to do is closely socialize with allosexuals for a bit, and the doubts will dissipate.

[arthurs-regime]

Demicupio ( Valerie) Flag !

Happy Valentine's Day! We present to you our self-indulgent coining of the demicupio flag

Flag Definition

✧ . Demicupiro & Demicupix - someone who desires relationship, yet does not experience any attraction until after emotionally bonding with someone * can be fully spelled out as Demicupioromantic or Demicupiosexual. It can also be referred as the Valerie Flag * updated flag on 2-20-26

Color Meanings

cyan & purple - fluidity through alloromantic & aromantic attraction white - developed attraction after close bond has been made yellow - fluidity through platonic and other attractions peach - fluidity through allosexual & asexual attraction

Bonus - Flag Recap

Demisexual \ Demiromantic - someone who only feels sexual \ romantic attraction after having emotionally bonded with someone Cupiosexual \ Cupioromantic - someone who does not experience sexual \ romantic attraction but still desires a sexual \ romantic relationship

Extra

yes, we've seen other demicupio flags, so just call this a redesign or an alternate version! this flag can of course be paired with any other term - Ex: demicupiro-queer, demi-pan-cupix, etc.

[this-is-anti-subtliden]

Since the comment that called you biphobic pissed me off af: I don't understand why people can't grasp the concept that somebody could be in any type of relationship with somebody when they're not attracted to them, if it's not a-spec (sometimes they don't even understand why people on a-spec would be in relationships if they're not attracted to another person, though). I mean, more people can understand cupio- aspecs but when it comes to e.g. cupiogex & cupiohex identities [these two terms I was able to find. There are possibly more, but looking for them would be hard], they're getting angry and can't grasp the concept. Why e.g. people can understand that an aromantic (cupioromantic) person could be in a romantic relationship with somebody, but they can't grasp a concept of hetero (cupiohex) person in a relationship with someone of dissimilar gender or a gay man (cupiogex) in a relationship with a woman???

Why only a-specs can be in a relationship with someone they feel no attraction to, but when you feel attraction you can only be in a relationship with somebody you feel attracted to???

I hope I wrote it clearly (if anything isn't clear, just say that and I'll clarify it).

This is anti subtliden

[cookiekat-blogz]

halfway through my pride pfp and I’m realizing I might be cupiosexual… 😕

happy pride month especially to the aroace-specs who are still struggling to find an identity that fits