I can imagine reasons for Cayde being for and against its use (after all, give a Hunter a new toy and they can scarcely stay away), but what do you think Andal's view would've been on Stasis? Or Tevis? I know we know comparatively little about them, but I'm curious to hear your two cents about it.
HMMM MK interesting thought
SO imma take this one boy at a time:
So from what I can gather about the type of man Andal was, I feel like he’d take the same sort of stance that the rest of the Vanguard did:
He’d be hesitant about using Stasis, but understand that it can be used for good.
One of those ‘I’ll let them use it, but I’m not gonna be super happy about it’ kind of situations. After all, “…he was always more… I think "diplomatic" is the word?”
Now with TEVIS, I feel like, as a Nightstalker, he would be the most lenient about the use of Stasis. After all, using Void Light carries a similar risk, because it “…doesn’t matter how good you are—you stay out there too long, you're not coming back. Not the same way you left, anyway.”
Nightstalkers already have to tiptoe the line between Light and Dark as it is, how is Stasis any different?
It’s funny though—and I’m just musing here a little—just thinking about how the most probable reason as to why Cayde would be as against Stasis as he would (and why he’s against using Darkness in ANY capacity), is because he’s probably seen glimpses of the destruction Darkness can cause; Exos are haunted with fragmented memories of their past lives, and Cayde’s mentioned having memories Pre-Collapse and possibly DURING the Collapse.
Andal and Tevis don’t have that weight.
I wonder, would their opinions change if they did have similar memories of the Collapse as well?
Or, is it just that Cayde is SO terrified of loss, that messing with Darkness is one gamble he’s just not personally willing to play?
Just some food for thought
