Some Meta about Damian and Jason
So, I've been seeing some discussions on fandom versus canon and the relationships of Jason, Damian, and some of the other Bats. And I wanted to address some of the issues I see, without spamming anyone, so I decided to make my own post.
First off: Fanon likes to overcorrect for racism and most other kinds of bigotry. A great example of this is with Dick. As a Romani person, I grew up loving Dick Grayson as one of very few Romani characters in comics. I grew up with my mother talking about all the symbolism in the Robin costume, the fact that he had been in a circus for generations, Dick as a a name, and when it was confirmed the nineties by Lian I was over the moon.
Then Devin Grayson happened, and for a lot of people, the very idea of Dick being Rom became about nothing but sexualization and fetishization. Why? Because Devin Grayson confirmed it, even though Lian did in the nineties. Now you get some people who will celebrate it as diversity, while others will get really mad and call you racist if you push Dick as Rom. I, as a half-Rom person, got called racist for using Romani chib/Romanes in a story because omg don't you know that was only Devin Grayson and he's always been white!!!!!
With Damian, there's been a lot of movement to make the Al Ghul's worse for decades within the comics. Talia is supposed to be Dick's age, but instead now she's an immortal and horrible mother that experiments on her son.
The League has strayed so far from what it was originally supposed to be that people don't even know it started for the purpose of protecting nature/the planet. The first uses of the Lazarus Pits were to try and increase endangered and possibly extinct species. Grant Morrison was one of the worst with this.
So, fanon sees the white saviorism in taking the multiracial brown kid out of the hands of the evil ARABS and have Bruce and Dick teach him in ten minutes that killing is wrong, mmmkay.
So, Fanon looks at the historical influences on the League, the old purposes, the Talia who took down Lex from the inside, and combines that with the Talia that was in Lost Days, and shakes out a better, less racist version of a very flawed mother.
If DC can somehow take Nyssa Raatko, a character that literally tortured her little sister for months, repeatedly taking her to the edge of death and then Lazarus'ing her, for not being Al Ghul enough, and turn her into a doting mom who accepts her trans child -- why can't fanon use Old!Talia as a mom and not Icky!Talia?
Now, into this, throw Jason. Jason, who was supposed to come back as a kind of lesson, who was being set up to become Nightwing's big enemy. There are interviews with the writers who were shocked that so many people liked Jason. Not in a "Oh, a hot villain" way, or in the way some people like Joker, but in the "Yeah, I like his view, I respect it," way.
DC did not expect this, and had no idea what to do with it. Batman is DC's cash cow, and they can't have anyone on the good side seriously disagree with him, but if Jason adopts the no-kill rule, then the people who like him for putting down the monsters won't like it, and we start the flip-flop that is still happening. He's following the rule, he's not. He's family, he's not.
So they write the majority of Lost Days, giving us the best maternal relationship Jason gets, depending on your opinions of Nocturna. We see good mom Talia and people love it, up until DC tries to get people to hate Talia by pputting that scene in Lost Days. They had seen how people had turned on Slade and Hal, neither of which were intended to turn people on those characters, so obviously people would turn on Talia, right?
Some did. Most just went: "This is out of character and must be because Nyssa is torturing her every night."
They Bring Red Hood back in, but they need confirm that killing bad, missing again, why people liked him. I'm a survivor of child-on-child SA that the system never punished, because "They are just kids." Do you know how many years I sent letters to Santa, the Tooth Fairy, God, asking them to just make them go away? It is all too common for victims to be told that they need to heal they need to get over it. Red Hood gives victims a hero who is willing to be the monster under the bed who will end the monster hurting you, so they can never hurt you again. That is comforting to a lot of people, in a way that the no-kill rule, and Bruce or Cass's moral code is not.
But Batman is the cash cow, and Robin is Batman's biological son, so he has to become like Batman, and reject the morals of his evil family and his low class maybe-brother in two months.
That's not realistic, so fanon stretches it out, builds connections that make more sense to them, that make the choices seem less arbitrary. They try to explain a Jason who knew Batman had a kill count, who was handed a gun by Bruce, who was told fathers avenge their sons being mad that the rules changed after his death. They look at a Jason who was with the League with Damian and go "They can't have never met."
I'm not saying either side is inherently wrong, I'm saying that they have different understandings of the characters and read it different ways. It's important to allow people to think and to explore, otherwise the fandoms we love would become stagnant.