US Declaration of Independence Tie, Necktie with US Declaration of Independence. Lawmaker gift, Legislator gift, In Congress JULY 4 1776

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Poland
seen from Poland

seen from Australia
seen from South Africa
seen from Netherlands

seen from Australia

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Russia

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Egypt

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
US Declaration of Independence Tie, Necktie with US Declaration of Independence. Lawmaker gift, Legislator gift, In Congress JULY 4 1776
Declaration of Independence, meaning being rediscovered these days...Amen... #declarationofindependence #foundingdocuments #foundingfathers #courage #walldecor #interiors #homedecor #educationalart #giftart #holidayart #usaart #heritageart #fallart #woop #hangthatart (at Rehoboth, Massachusetts) https://www.instagram.com/p/CHEp88bHtPm/?igshid=1n1wrt2bq9pf7
“Preamble...We, the people...” time to revisit these founding documents, crucial to our history, crucial to future... #preamble #wethepeople #usconstitution #foundingdocuments #revisit #crucial #history #future #ushistory #american #americanlore #freedom #liberty #summerlife #americanideals #2020 (at Rehoboth, Massachusetts) https://www.instagram.com/p/CB4SdpAHN4i/?igshid=1lqaz5r1r88fo
Good question.
This article brings up a crucial set of points. It would seem the Constitution can't address what the public mind isn't ready to process. Thoughts?
"With a majority of the public now supporting same-sex marriage (overwhelmingly among Democrats and young people, and even by a slim margin of Republicans under the age of 50), those who believe, as I do, that the Constitution acquires meaning outside the courts are seeing powerful validation. Yet it’s validation with an interesting footnote. When Theodore Olson and David Boies filed their lawsuit against Proposition 8 four years ago, they were met with deep skepticism and even anger from the established gay-rights groups that had refrained from just such litigation. It was too soon to present the Supreme Court with such a big target, the mainstream thinking ran. Let the issue continue to develop. Don’t invite backlash."
It might seem coincidental that the author we're reading (again) for this week took on a controversy currently in play...in 1995...in the New York Review of Books... until we realize that Sam knows everything. Everything...
"Time after time, in dreary expectable ways, the quotes bandied about by Standard Model scholars turn out to be truncated, removed from context, twisted, or applied to a debate different from that over the Second Amendment."
..."In order to make any progress at all, we must restrict ourselves to what, precisely, is covered by the Second Amendment. That is not hard to determine, once the irrelevant debris adrift around its every term has been cleared away. Each term exists in a discernible historic context, as does the sentence structure of the amendment."
Mrs. Hart is not, she said, just some small-town church lady.
“I go to First Baptist,” she said. “I wear a Pentecostal hairdo. I play the organ at the Episcopal church. When I could sing, I was the alto at Church of Christ. I have taught in a Catholic school. I am 77, and I am not a little old lady with a 15-year-old car that has 3,000 miles on it. I sky-dived last summer. I have a life, and I love this class.”
Hannah Pak: The Declaration of Independence
Did you find phrases in the beginning of the Declaration of Independence, "dissolve the political bonds","connect them with one another" and "laws of nature" clever and convincing when you were reading the Declaration? Do you think specific metaphors such as " sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance" were things that people during that time could relate to?