From Instagram

seen from Malaysia
seen from Brazil
seen from United Kingdom

seen from China

seen from Norway
seen from China

seen from Norway

seen from France

seen from Malaysia

seen from Malaysia

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from Brazil

seen from Philippines

seen from Netherlands
seen from United Kingdom

seen from Singapore
seen from China
From Instagram
Texas voters have listed immigration and border security among their top issues for years, but recent polling found they are less of a prior
I'm gonna elaborate on my take of Scream Street residents begin an analogy for inmigrants
The monsters are keept from the human wordl because they are "dangerous", but the humans are usually the most violent ones. They are keept into small communities with other monsters where conditions are questionable and cheap. Even if monsters existed in the human wordl for centuries along the humans, humans will still get scared of them and will kill them. (Kian and his mother)
G. H. O. U. L is willing to commit the cruelest acts towards its residents, even sending kids into the underlands if they consider then a threat (Dixon, Luke, Cleo, Resus, etc)
Otto, despite hating monsters, will use their money, culture and resources for his own enjoyment . He also thinks that by hating his own kind he will somehow stop begin monster (latinos for Trump)
In the specific case of the series there's McBread who seems to be more responsible and reasonable, he is aware of Otto's corruption but never acts seriously on it or any way to bring some of his power down. (UN)
These communities are poorly developed, have greedy leaders and no voice in important matters. Otto can just turn the city into a circus and it would be allowed. Their budget always goes to his pockets and anyone who is accused of crime will meet a twisted fate begin sent into the underlands (begin deported to a foreign country)
Jobs, family, and the pursuit of better opportunities abroad are driving a steady outflow of citizens, data and experts show.
Over the past five years, 61,116 Malaysians have renounced their citizenship, with women making up the majority of applicants
While the numbers tell one part of the story, the reasons behind this trend reflect a mix of economic, personal, and legal factors. Economic opportunities top the list. Many skilled and educated Malaysians leave because local jobs do not match their qualifications or pay expectations. Singapore is by far the most popular destination, accounting for 93.78% of renunciations, followed by Australia (2.15%), Brunei (0.97%), and other countries (3.1%). "For some, it's about work and income," explained National Registration Department (JPN) Director-General Datuk Badrul Hisham Alias. "It's easier to secure citizenship abroad if they are employed there and have stable earnings, particularly in countries like Singapore."
Family considerations, along with legal and procedural factors, also play a major role in decisions to renounce Malaysian citizenship
Some applicants relocate to join their spouses abroad, such as marrying a foreign national, and choose to adopt their partner's citizenship. The largest group of renunciations is among those aged 31 to 40, followed closely by the 21-to-30 bracket. Women lead the trend, accounting for 35,356 of the total applicants, highlighting a demographic shift in migration patterns. Malaysia does not recognise dual citizenship under its Federal Constitution. Citizens who acquire a foreign nationality and exercise associated rights, such as voting, may face revocation of their Malaysian citizenship. While such cases are fewer than voluntary renunciations, they form part of the broader context. "Every application to renounce or reapply for citizenship is reviewed carefully," said Badrul. "The process ensures that citizenship rights are not misused, and only those genuinely eligible are granted or allowed to give up citizenship."
Experts say this trend underscores the need for Malaysia to address talent retention
They added that Malaysia must create quality job opportunities and improve conditions for skilled workers to prevent a steady brain drain. "People are leaving not just for personal reasons but because the system abroad offers better recognition of their skills and opportunities for career growth," Ahmed Abdul Latiff of Putra Business School noted. "If this continues unchecked, the country could lose more of its brightest minds."
Texas and Florida leads U-Haul's 'Development Index' of in-migration states for 2025
American Property Organization founder Jason Haber unboxes the state of the real estate market and examines Redfin’s news of a ‘wonderful real estate reset’ can be found in 2026 on ‘The Claman Countdown.’ Texas and Florida once more lead the checklist of united state states that one of the most individuals are transferring to, according to an evaluation by U-Haul. The relocating firm, which…
ICE launches “Swamp Sweep” in southeast Louisiana with 250 agents targeting thousands of undocumented immigrants across New Orleans and nearby parishes.
Después de la crisis del 2001, Argentina presentó un proyecto contra-hegemonico y alternativo a lo que estaba sucediendo en otros países. En el medio de la criminalización de los "inmigrantes", Argentina cambió la ley de la dictadura por una fundada en una visión humanitarista y de derechos humanos que reresentó un corte categorico con la lógica de la seguridad nacional.
Dentro del 2003-2004, se reconoció a la migración como un derecho humano esencial, se garantizó la salud, la educación, la seguridad y la reunificación familiar sin importar la situación migratoria de las personas. Además, hubo programas tales como el "programa patria grande" que regularizó la situación de más de 700.000 personas con respecto a los documentos, "Raices" se vinculó y reintegró a cientificos que se habían ido del país, "Provincia 25" se vinculó con argentinos emigrados.
No sólo eso, sino que se hicieron normativas y tratados con el Mercosur para proteger a los trabajadores migrantes de explotación laboral, así como contra el tráfico de personas y la discriminación. Se permitió el voto de los emigrados, se llegó un acuerdo con la residencia.
Translation: After the 2001 crisis, Argentina presented a counter-hegemonic and alternative project to what was happening in other countries. Amid the criminalization of "immigrants," Argentina replaced the dictatorship's law with one based on a humanitarian and human rights vision that represented a categorical break with the logic of national security. During 2003-2004, migration was recognized as an essential human right, and health, education, security, and family reunification were guaranteed regardless of a person's immigration status. In addition, there were programs such as the "Patria Grande", which regularized the documentation status of more than 700,000 people; "Raices" (Roots) program, which linked and reintegrated scientists who had left the country; and "Provincia 25" (Province 25) program, which worked with Argentine emigrants. Not only that, but regulations and treaties were enacted with Mercosur to protect migrant workers from labor exploitation, human trafficking, and discrimination. Emigrants were allowed to vote, and an agreement was reached on residency.