So I think it was you (I follow a couple therapy blogs) that mentioned they won't see any patients while they're in an altered state (non-prescribed drugs, alcohol, etc) for ethical reasons. Can you explain the reasons for that (is it, patients might not have their proper boundaries and do things they'll regret in session, or what?) and is there a hard line or a bit of a judgment call (if I fuck up and forget I have an appointment and have a beer before going, do they have to send me home)?
There was a delay in answering this because I had to pull out my law and ethics textbook and poll some of my therapist friends. Because this had been part of my licensing exam and I was looking for justification. See this is why I love getting these asks - it keeps me sharp. Not seeing intoxicated clients happens for a lot of reasons and Iâll go through them.
1) Itâs a judgement call. Usually. If you are working for agency or a hospital (like me), then you may be bound by the rule of the agency or hospital. Because we work primarily with minors, we are not allowed to see intoxicated clients. Have I probably had a session with a kid who smokes weed before school when Iâve seen them at lunch? Yeah sure - but Iâve been seeing most of my caseload at the agency for a while so they will tell me even though they know I will stop the session. So because of where I work, I donât have the wiggle room I have in private practice.
2) It is unethical to do therapy with someone who canât consent, barring emergency, lifesaving treatment. So if you show up to therapy off your tits drunk or high as a kite - you arenât really consenting to therapy because you arenât able to consent period. Just before we have gotten informed consent in prior sessions - itâs not consent forever. One of my therapist friends who I think is a total baller said, âA lot of therapy is about intention and accountability. I think if someone is so intoxicated they canât be intentional or accountable - or theyâre avoiding those two things through their intoxication - thatâs a problem. Even if it helps with disclosure, that disclosure needs to be intentional and accountable, or you have little basis to move forward.â And I 100% agree. She summed up my thoughts pretty perfectly. Disclosure that you can only share when you are really drunk means that the therapist needs to work on the safety of the room and relationship and have patience.Â
3) It can be physical safety concern if you are visibly intoxicated. What is this person like when they are drunk? Are they going to get angry and put themselves or me in danger? Another colleague spoke about a client who would consistently attempt to run through traffic when intoxicated. So thatâs dangerous. Are you so drunk you are going to lose consciousness? Throw up and choke? Will we have to call 911 because youâve stripped to your undies and are throwing chairs in the lobby? All of those actions have consequences that could take weeks or months to sort out. You are just unpredictable when you are intoxicated and your reaction may change. Itâs also a physical safety concern for us. Clients experience maternal/paternal transference as well as erotic transference. With erotic transference, alcohol may lower a clientâs inhibitions and they may try to touch/kiss/etc (a colleague I trust had this happen to him - he was an agency in a group office setting so he was able to get out but it effectively ended the therapy between the two. The client was enraged that he refused her sexual overtures and he was worried about being sued.) Each therapist has their own history and aggressive or sexualized behavior may not bother them. But it would bother some of us. Â Â
4) Substances can make you more emotionally volatile too. Reactions can be bigger and more intense which if you are dealing with someone who is suicidal or at risk in other ways is a problem. If you are in a group setting, you could be triggering other clients struggling with either sobriety or recovery from trauma inflicted by another while drunk.Â
5) Seeing intoxicated clients is an enormous liability issue. Therapy on the therapistâs side isnât just about the relationship with client and all that good stuff - itâs also about managing risk. You want to protect yourself in your records and because of the issues mentioned above you could be putting your license at risk. If they canât remember the session and are assault after session, that puts in you a bad position. And like I love my clients but I need my license to make a living and still owe a fuckton of loans so Iâm not going to risk it.
6) In some states, if you are too intoxicated to drive but have driven to therapy, your therapist may be required to report you the police if you are planning to get back into your car (due to credible harm to other). I am really uncomfortable with this but thatâs the state law where I live and I think itâs kinda gross. I would rather lyft/taxi the client home and pro-rate the fee to them.Â
Lastly - The consensus from people I know who work in recovery, addiction or chronically homeless population is in favor of seeing people when they are intoxicated provided they are with it enough to understand whatâs going on. In some programs and community mental health settings, refusing to work with intoxicated people would have resulted in many people not being served. Another friend stated that âAlso, everyone is stoned CONSTANTLY in post-2015 Washington. So thereâs that too.â Which should also be considered.
Iâm not touching on deliberate, planned intoxication - because that is something very different. There is some great PTSD trials right now regarding a day long therapy with a client who takes drugs (I want to say it was ecstasy) in your presence and then you go at the hard stuff.Â
TLDR; if you have a beer before therapy, itâll probably be fine as long as your therapist/agency doesnât have a 24 hours prior sobriety clause in the informed consent. If you are worried, find out where your therapist stands. Talk about it.Â