This is your reminder that COVID was a psyop.
seen from China
seen from Germany

seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from Türkiye

seen from United Kingdom
seen from Malaysia

seen from Germany
seen from United States

seen from Australia
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from Philippines

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Australia

seen from China
seen from United Kingdom
This is your reminder that COVID was a psyop.
At this point can we all agree it was a bioweapon?
“At this point can we all agree it was a bioweapon?”
A Brief Word on Mandates
In 1936, President Franklin Roosevelt won 60.8% of the popular vote—the second highest percentage in modern America—and won 98% of the electoral votes. His party won 56% of the House seats and held 75% of the Senate. This was a clear mandate for the New Deal, a program meant to rescue Americans from the Great Depression.
In 1964, President Lyndon Johnson won 61.1% of the popular vote—the highest percentage in modern America—and won 90% of the electoral votes. His party won 68% of the House seats and held 68% of the Senate. This was a clear mandate for the Great Society, a program meant to expand the New Deal and civil rights.
In 2024, President Donald Trump won 49.8% of the popular vote—not even a majority—and won 58% of the electoral votes. His party won 51% of the House seats and held 53% of the Senate. These small majorities signify, at best, broad disappointment in both parties’ candidates and agendas.
There is no popular mandate here. If there were, Congress would have passed more than one bill already.
The Covid-19 pandemic should teach Americans to never defer to “experts” who promise that granting them boundless power will keep everyone else safe.
Read More: https://thefreethoughtproject.com/government-corruption/five-years-later-we-remember-how-politicians-unleashed-covid-tyranny
#TheFreeThoughtProject
Sega mandate one by one - what I think
Game characters cannot have relatives unless they're established in the game canon (Cream the Rabbit, Battle Kukku XVI, Eggman and Shadow the Hedgehog being the only exceptions, as they're the only game-related characters to have physically present parents (Black Doom, Great Battle Kukku XV, Gerald and Vanilla)). (SatAM characters are unaffected by this mandate, which may explain why Tundra Walrus aka the post-SGW version of Sherman Walrus is a thing)
I can live with this... Though I like Uncle Chuck
Sonic cannot get overly emotional (which is often paraphrased or misinterpreted as "Sonic can't cry."), since Sega considers it completely out-of-character for Sonic to act like that. (Though we did see Sonic cry in some instances such as Scrapnik Island #4 (albeit with Mecha MK. II's tears) and Archie STH #254).
This one is a bit extreme if not too much extreme. Crying Sonic happened in games (SA2), Sonic X, Sonic Prime... the issue is that eyes had to stay dry (even if this don't make sense). Or that we could not be allowed to see his face. This applies on Japanese media too (and is not a Japan issue since lots of character cry in japanese media, is just Sonic)
Sonic seems to be allowed to cry only when he does it comically
I don't say Sonic must pull his quills when desperate, that would be stupid. But if the contexts requires him crying, he should.
I strongly disagree with this mandate.
The planet cannot be named, as "Mobius" cannot be spoken or mentioned as the name of the planet, and it is not allowed to be called "Earth" either—The only name SEGA confirms that it's simply "Sonic's world". (Though Mobius is used in the Paramount universe)
I'm neutral about this. But Moebius is a nice name, it should stick around the fandom.
Characters restricted to one of the two different time periods cannot appear in the other time period and vice versa. As Mighty, Ray, the Hooligans, Trip, Battle Kukku Army, and possibly even Tails Doll and Metal Knuckles are restricted to the classic time period and are banned to appear in modern material. And even though the infamous "Two Universes" mandate being retconned since November 2022, the characters restricted to certain time periods are STILL unable to appear in the other time period and vice versa.
This one is fair. There are already too many characters in the sonic franchise, most are not even interesting. I would even cut off more characters (In reality I would do nothing with this , that would be unfair toward the fans)
Sonic always has to win. Even if Eggman does get the upper hand for a short period, Sonic has to immediately overcome him.
It is not what happens in most stories? (not only Sonic's)
None of the game characters can have a steady relationship, and Amy cannot like anyone but Sonic. Sonic and Amy cannot date at all as they would lose their dynamic. (SatAM characters are unaffected by this mandate)
This is fair.
Characters and material from other licensed properties and past incarnations of the franchise (Sonic the Comic, Sonic the Hedgehog (Archie Comics), Adventures of Sonic the Hedgehog, Sonic the Hedgehog (SatAM), Sonic Underground, the OVA and Sonic X) cannot be used. This is due to a combination of legal issues (at least in the case of the nasty legal battles regarding the Archie Sonic comics, since their entire character roster and the SATAM cast are now hanging in legal limbo) and, per word of Ian Flynn, Sega simply not being keen on giving attention to past incarnations of Sonic that aren't their own and wanting to keep the focus on Modern Sonic product, and have thus forbidden using them. Elements and characters from the Paramount films and even the Sonic Boom universe (except Sticks) are also forbidden.
This is also fair, too much is too much. (personally I would save uncle Chuck and Stone, but here things are more complicate than just mandates)
No characters can be killed-off.
Fair
None of the cast are allowed to change their wardrobe or wear any different wardrobe at allunless approved.
At least they should change according to the outside temperature.
According to Ian Flynn, Sega says that Team Dark are not a consistent thing and the name is strictly a marketing term. In other words, the three of them are not an organized team and often spend most of the time doing their own things, and seem to work for G.U.N. as freelancers as opposed to agents in their employ. Shadow apparently also doesn't consider Rouge and Omega "friends" (though Sonic Battle shows that he prefers to call them his "allies" instead, given his emotionally distant personality).
Disagree. They, at least Rouge and Shadow, have been shown to be friends. Rouge in games tried to cheer up Shadow many times and to stay on his side in his bad moments. Shadow also did something like this once.
Omega is a machine that is learning how to recognize emotions. in Snic 2006 he felt guilty when he aknowledge what the would do un the future.
Male characters that aren't humans, can't wear pants.
Quite extreme.
Naming the animals Mobians is banned.
Already talked about Mobius. Same applies here
Characters and elements from Sonic Chronicles: The Dark Brotherhood are off-limits too, likely due to a combination of the game taking elements of the Archieverse, the game being non-canon, SEGA keeping Knuckles as the last echidna, the lawsuit of Electronic Arts/EA and SEGA by Ken Penders from 2011 and to not to get into trouble with Ken Penders despite him not owning the characters.
Fair. I liked Sonic Chronicles personally, but Penders seems to be uncontrollable over the echidnas. His stories in Archie often get a little bit too weird.
Respecting the People's Mandate: A Call for Swift Confirmations
Members of the United States Congress,
We, The American People of these United States of America.
Monday, January 06, 2025