there's some sort of shill site at guaifenesin.org that's popping up in search results now. i hope ive made it clear on this blog but even when i say some sort of quack therapy like the "guaifenesin protocol" may have some clinical veracity, it always comes with a big fat disclaimer i should always make explicit, that wherever there is any sort of hard-to-treat chronic illness, there are going to be hundreds of predatory, deadly snake oil salesmen waiting to lie to you about it. most quack therapies are founded on research that is either bunk, or is not bunk but has been misinterpreted and then monetized harmfully. this is also the case with "guaifenesin protocol". you should avoid any discussion of taking guaifenesin to treat fibro/me-cfs that isnt ground floor peer-reviewed research, or--and this second type of writing should be regarded with extreme skepticism--stuff from people who are not making money from the situation and also are regarding the subject with extreme skepticism. including and especially MY BLOG. but Mark London the MIT guy is another good example, just in my personal opinion (my opinion being unreliable, im just some guy online, not trustworthy or credentialed), of someone who is skeptical and ambivalent enough about the topic to have his discussion of it worth reading if one is so inclined.
