Armand loved the 60s and 70s not for the clothes or the music, because it was when all the fucked up psychological experiments were happening and he thought they were neat

seen from China

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Malaysia

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Panama
seen from Sweden

seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Ireland

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from Slovakia

seen from United States
seen from Japan
Armand loved the 60s and 70s not for the clothes or the music, because it was when all the fucked up psychological experiments were happening and he thought they were neat
scratching at the walls of scientific institutions and universities like let me innnn let me IN you cannot stop my spiral of psych and sociology research in its tracks like this, let me IN let me IN please please please i want to Learn i want to Expand my Knowledge please please please please
THE MILGRAM EXPERIMENT
Gravity Falls 196X, two young men freshly out of Backupsmore University's college have started working on a new experiment
Other versions
so uh milgram fans are we ready to talk about this yet?
the fact that the real subject of the “experiment” of milgram is Es, not the prisoners? and how beyond the story, the true subjects are actually us, the viewers?
Milgram experiment - Wikipedia
Overall thoughts on Milgram
The Stanley Milgram Experiment is a series of psychological experiments so damaging and unethical that it can never legally be recreated--but it CAN be creatively reimagined and re-enacted as an interactive transmedia story game. The easiest misconception you can make about the Milgram Project is that the prisoners are the subject of this experiment. In reality, our reactions and the decisions we make position us as the real participants. The question Stanley Milgram sought to answer in his experiments was to what extent ordinary people would be willing to inflict harm and possibly death to an unseen (but not unheard) stranger in an adjacent room if instructed to by an authority figure. Similarly, in the Milgram Project the question is not so much "are the prisoners guilty" but rather "would you vote them guilty if there is a chance it would kill them?" meanwhile an omniscient Jackalope eggs us on to embrace the harsher punishment. Since we already know that the prisoners are fictional, we are encouraged to get to know them and become attached, in order for our decisions to still carry an emotional weight for us. We are meant to grapple with the gravity of sentencing someone to death and go back and forth about what the right thing to do is, forgiveness or punishment. We are meant to think about whether the judgements we make in Milgram are consistent with our morals and how we judge others in the real world. We are meant to struggle with the responsibility of it, or to shift responsibility to Milgram itself instead. Truly the best addition is the decision to make the characters prisoners. In this way they changed the dynamic to be an examination of attitudes towards punitive vs restorative justice itself, rather than random chance and our capacity for cruelty. As someone who first became fascinated by the Stanley Milgram Experiment over a decade ago, it has been so cool to participate in Milgram over the last couple years.
YOU’RE TELLING ME PROJECT DIVA PREDICTED MILGRAM?
istg this is where deco got the idea to name it after the Milgram shock experiments I’m calling it now
Hot take: all prospective civil servants should have to undergo the Milgram Experiment to see just how much of a bastard they'll be when ordered by a superior. Anyone who gives a lethal shock should not be hired.
“Where do you go in your free time?” Where do people usually go?