"we need our movement to be a unified front" -> "shut up about issues between groups in our movement, this isn't the time, the real enemy is all that matters" ❌ both maintains existing problems and shoots itself in the foot. the groups you want to join your unified front won't want to work with you if you do this. firm lose/lose.
"we need our movement to be a unified front" -> "one of the central goals of our movement should be to understand and act on the issues faced by different groups within our movement, even if it means admitting to conflict inside our unified front" ✅ necessary if you actually want to build that unified front. plus now you are working on problems you probably should care about independently. why would you not do this.
this is about queer movements shouting down specific concerns by trans people, trans women especially, queer people of color, really any group that might have intergroup history or power structures that don't stop existing because we're all queer here. this is also about leftist organizing that asks people to leave at the door their struggle for equality of race, gender, sexuality, etc and commit to class struggle only.
unity requires deep solidarity and understanding. you will never achieve a unified front by telling the people inside it to shut up