0 -> 0 GOE to 4Lz (very good height and very good length, steps before the jump/unexpected or creative entry -2 deduction for weak landing)
important note: ive heard there's some debate on whether or not the 4Lz is q/<, but, based on my footage, it's landed between the 45° and 60° mark, so it's cleanly rotated
+2 -> 1.6 GOE to 3A (very good height and very good length, steps before the jump/unexpected or creative entry, element matches the music, -1 deduction for weak landing)
+2 -> 0.52 to CSSp3 (good speed and/or acceleration during spin, effortless throughout, element matches the music, -1 deduction for traveling)
important note: the sit spin lost a level because the first position after the change of foot lacked revolutions in a valid position with the upper leg at least parallel to the ice
FCSp3 0 -> 0 to FCSp3 GOE (element matches the music, -1 deduction for slow or reduction of speed)
important note: the camel spin lost a level because the knee was not above the hip during the last spin position
0 -> 0 to 4F+3T GOE (very good height and very good length, eement matches the music, -1 deduction for weak landing, -1 deduction for long preparation)
+3 -> 1.17 to StSq4 (deep edges, clean steps and turns, element matches the music, good acceleration and deceleration)
+3 -> 1.05 to CCoSp4 (good speed and/or acceleration during spin, effortless throughout, element matches the music)
for a total GOE of 4.34 and a TES of 53.36
this basically just confirmed my suspicion that jason should be leading after the short program
if anyone has an informed reason to disagree (especially on the spin levels, because i admittedly had to consult the technical panel handbook several times to rescore those), please tell me lol.