Apr 21, 2025
Are willogenic systems valid?
Yes
No
Neutral/See Results
Voting ended onApr 28, 2025
seen from China
seen from Malaysia
seen from Netherlands
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Malaysia
seen from Singapore
seen from China
seen from Mexico
seen from Türkiye
seen from Greece
seen from Germany
seen from China
seen from Malaysia
seen from China
seen from United Kingdom
seen from India
seen from Mexico
seen from China
seen from Maldives
seen from Germany
Are willogenic systems valid?
Yes
No
Neutral/See Results
Soulbonding and DNI's
Endos DNI includes soulbonding (anti endo)
Endos DNI doesn't include soulbonding (anti endo)
Endos DNI includes soulbonding (endo)
Endos DNI doesn't include soulbonding (endo)
Endos DNI includes soulbonding (soulbonder)
Endos DNI doesn't include soulbonding (soulbonder)
I have no idea if it does or doesn't/I don't care
I just want the results
Done out of curiosity. Reminder, not all soulbonders are plural and obviously not all plural people are soulbonders.-Yharon
Should anti-endos be considered a hate group?
Yes. They fit the definition.
Yes. They fit aspects of the definition, enough that it should be considered.
Maybe. I’m still unsure on this.
No. They fit aspects of the definition, but not enough to be considered one.
No. They do not fit the definition.
Many pro-endo systems have begun saying that anti-endos should be considered a hate group. I am curious syscoursers thoughts on this.
I'm really curious, because a lot of the time, I find myself assuming that the majority (though certainly not all) of endogenic systems prefer People Based language over Parts Based language. I wonder how much this is the case?
Which type of language do you prefer to use for your system? (For ENDOGENIC Systems)
People Based Language (Treating headmates as individual, fully developed people)
Parts Based Language (Treating headmates as parts of one whole)
A combination of the two is preferred!
I don't use either of these (please elaborate, I'd love to know more!)
See Results (I either don't feel like sharing, or I am not endogenic)
Do you believe in system hopping?
Yes, I have experienced system hopping
Yes, any experience is probably real
Mixed, headmates/alters can travel to other system's inner worlds but not front
No, no form of system hopping exists in any capacity
No, I was manipulated into believing something was system hopping that wasn't an
Complex, system hopping does exist but is not worth the risk of harm
Anti, whether system hopping exists or not it is harmful and shouldn't be practi
Neutral, I have no idea and I don't care
Alternate, "system hopping" is a misnomer for something else (or other alt)
See results/No opinion
submitted – asked not to credit
Are tulpagenic systems valid?
Yes
No
Neutral/See Results
Are endogenic systems valid?
Yes
No
Would you change your stance if research didn't agree with it?
Yes
No