#syscourse unaligned

[theinsomniaccoven]

I hate how misunderstood osdd-1a is. I made a post a while ago talking about systemhood with a lack of amnesia barriers like osdd-1b and alters like osdd-1a, and so many ppl were like "so you mean a singlet" no that's actually not what I fucking said. Osdd-1a does not mean "doesnt have alters" it means theyre less elaborated or differentiated, like theyre all fragments or just different "versions" of the same identity, or maybe they all appear the same in headspace but use different labels and names. The best analogy I have for it is all those 2016 sans undertale AU ensembles and comics people would draw, theyre all the same person just different "versions". It doesn't matter if alters aren't that different from one another, if you still hear them in ur head and they still front then they are not just "mood states" like bpd or cptsd.

Osdd-1a systems are still SYSTEMS. They're still PLURAL. If they didn't have alters but still had amnesia barriers then thats not what a fucking system is, that would be diagnosed as dissociative amnesia (which yes, is a separate dx despite being a symptom of osddid!)

Sorry for the rant

[kegrexenine]

Idk I just feel like there were multiple different avenues Amaryllis could have gone down instead of sunsetting and leaving the entire community -- a pretty big chunk of whom are autistic -- frantically scrambling to find alternatives.

[ilkyute]

since we know a good 80% of my followers are plural/plural-adjacent in some way, here is your reminder that simplyplural is shutting down the servers soon, please make sure you've ported all/a good chunk of your information to an alternate site/app/etc!

[webrosestar]

 (ˆ ̳- ·̫ - ̳ˆ)◞❤︎   new post!!   ᜑ

★ refuses to engage in syscourse userboxes

[mycroft-syscourse]

Even if I am syscourse unaligned, I feel more drawn to pro endo spaces because I do not feel this systematic feeling of aggressiveness and miserably. "Endos die" and "endos kys" are common tags with anti endo people, as for now, I never saw an "anti-endo die/kys" tag.

And I do not want to generalise and say X always happens and Y never happens. But I find it hard to see positivity when looking at anti-endo tags versus pro endo or neutral tags.

I do not think we should say to people to die over harmless things.

[mettleplex]

Every time you say "plurality is CDD-only",

a singlet reads a willogenic plural's post,

and incorporates it into their understanding of CDDs.

[sysconversation]

Disclaimer: This blog is completely neutral and does not claim a syscourse stance. We believe there's a lot to be gained from both sides of the community. Our posts are in-good-faith and meant to stir up honest conversation in all syscourse stances and beliefs.

I understand a LOT of anti-endo sentiment and honestly share a few of the beliefs; the endo community can be harmful and spread misinformation about CDDs, they have a tendency to talk over CDDs in certain spaces, some are pro-harassment, some believe in FMSF and Grey Faction rhetoric, etc. Such things are why we can't identify as pro-endo.

The one argument I cannot understand is "Endos are faking a serious traumatic disorder."

Let me explain: From a completely neutral standpoint, people who fake things don't use terminology away from what they're faking. People faking disorders just say they have those disorders, they don't make up new words. If someone was faking a CDD, they would simply just say they have a CDD. So combining that with the vehement insistence from the vast majority of endos that they do NOT have a CDD and are removed from most of that experience, how do you defend saying they're faking our disorder?

[sysmedsaresexist]

Reminder :) the ISSTD says that DID is not rare