
seen from Malaysia

seen from Poland
seen from Kazakhstan
seen from China
seen from Australia
seen from Switzerland

seen from Australia
seen from China

seen from Malaysia

seen from France

seen from Australia

seen from Germany

seen from United Kingdom
seen from T1

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from Netherlands

seen from Australia

seen from Australia

seen from Saudi Arabia
Close Encounters of the Third Kind came out in 1977. Flight 19 went missing in the Bermuda Triangle in 1945.
If you did a story like that in 2026, it would have the science team find a squadron of planes that disappeared in 1994.
History's revenge.
War by its very nature destroys far more economic value than it creates through innovation. Most economic historians are in agreement here. Truth be told, it’s actually pretty obvious. So why do we think we need violence and death in order to create something new? Sir Henry Tizard was chief scientific advisor to the UK’s Air Ministry and Ministry of Aircraft Production in World War II. As such, he played an important role in the development of everything from radars to jet engines to nuclear power. Sir Tizard’s conclusion, as given in a 1948 speech, was that, with the possible exception of a few specific branches, war didn’t advance science in the slightest. On the whole, he felt that in wartime conditions “the advance of knowledge is slowed.” You blow the world into smithereens, but then succeed in mass-producing penicillin from the devastation. Of course the mass distribution of penicillin was a blessing, but there is no law of nature that states that good can only come of evil in this way. That you must kill six million people to get the Internet—an immense human sacrifice to the gods of technology, who in return reward you with Velcro and radar. Necessity is the mother of invention, the saying goes, but it also helps if she has money. War—or the threat thereof—tends to mobilize states to throw all they have at innovation. Where would we now be had we invested as much into doing something about the climate emergency as we did into the Cold War? Presumably a bit further along the way to a solution. Yet somehow we are mired in this idea that human ingenuity requires some degree of blood and death to kick into action.
Mother of Invention: How Good Ideas Get Ignored in an Economy Built for Men (Katrine Marçal)
This is how French illustrators imagined future technologies in 1924
I've found this picture on the internet and it made me reflect on the contrast between the past and the present. Beck then, people fantasized about the futur, just like we do today but the technology they imagined was very different. In this image, people are connecting with others via massive, strange equipment. In the background there is also what looks like an electric car.
I was born in 1990 and during my childhood there were no mobile phones, computers or electric scooters. I got my first mobile phone in 2006 as a gift from my mom. It only had MMS and SMS with no internet and the camera quality was poor but at the time it felt incredible because we didn't have the advanced gadgets we do now.
Technology has been advancing rapidly. Every year we see new models of phones, better cameras and the internet becoming more powerful. Now, we can not only talk to each other and post on social media but also do countless other things.
Today, we imagine colonizing other planets and people can create images using AI, just as illustrators did 100 years ago with their drawing skills. But now it's simple as typing a few worda and a machine created the picture.
Our descendants 100 or 200 years from now might look at our current creations while sitting on Mars. They'll probably feel surprised and smile, wondering how we could live without the technologies they have in their time.
And what do you think about this?
.
Ghosts in the Machine: The Dead Internet Theory, Cyberpsychosis, and the Decline of Critical Thought
The world of Cyberpunk 2077 has a haunting concept at its core: cyberpsychosis—the mental degradation caused by signal overload and overreliance on cybernetic augmentations. While this may seem like a dystopian exaggeration, the parallels to our own world are striking. In fact, one need only look at the Dead Internet Theory and society’s increasing trust in AI to see how this fiction reflects…
Terrible Fic Ideas #13: Harry Potter, but make it Tudor
As anyone who knows me will tell you, I'm fascinated by domestic history. It's part of why I tend to rewatch Victorian Farm, Tudor Monastery Farm, and the like at least once a year, and why I'm currently reading Judith Flanders' brilliant Inside the Victorian Home.
All of which, naturally, made me wonder: what if the wizarding world really was that backwards? Or more accurately: what if the wizarding world doesn't just look backwards? What if almost everything about it failed to move past, say, the year 1500?
The DARK SIDE of AI : Can we trust Self-Driving Cars?
Read our new blog and follow/subscribe for more such informative content. #artificialintelligence #ai #selfdrivingcars #tesla
Self-driving cars have been hailed as the future of transportation, promising safer roads and more efficient travel. They use artificial intelligence (AI) to navigate roads and make decisions on behalf of the driver, leading many to believe that they will revolutionize the way we commute. However, as with any technology, there is a dark side to AI-powered self-driving cars that must be…
View On WordPress