what

seen from United States
seen from Algeria
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Guam

seen from United States
seen from Singapore
seen from United States
seen from China
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from France

seen from United States

seen from United States
what
Not to get into community discourse, but I’d like to share a point.
Mind you, I have seen multiple sides to this “debate” as I like to have rounded knowledge before I say my piece, about ANYTHING political or discourse-y.
The statement I’ve seen again and again, in multiple places, is the sentiment that there aren’t bills directly targeting transmascs, or hatred directed specifically at transmascs, or anything else under that umbrella directed at transmascs.
Obviously there have been a lot of good counters to these statements, and I’m not going to repeat something that’s been said better or more eloquently by others.
However, I have yet to see anyone talking about something that, in my opinion, really should be referenced more.
The concept of “Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria” (ROGD).
ROGD as a concept was legitimately created to theorize why, all of a sudden, transmascs were coming out and attempting to transition.
Rather than acknowledging the blatant truth- tranness, to these people, was limited to AMABs, and even then, for the longest time “trans healthcare” for ANY trans person was just discouraging transition altogether- they decided to make up a narrative that suited their needs.
That their precious “daughters” were falling victim to a new disorder. Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria.
Rather than help their sons feel comfortable in their own bodies, masses of parents flocked to this idea. Politicians flocked to this idea, and used it as a BASIS for many anti-trans bills.
Need I cite the hopefully infamous book? “Irreversible Damage: The Transgender Craze Seducing Our Daughters”? The INFAMOUS book written elaborating this idea? The book used as evidence for countless transphobic bills?
That one concept (which, by the way, ROGD has been discredited by NUMEROUS health organizations worldwide, just in case I needed to clarify that) led to COUNTLESS transmascs facing abuses at home, in school, and elsewhere.
IDK, just food for thought. I think it’s odd that, in all my searching and read throughs of this discourse, NOBODY has mentioned this, even though it’s a pretty good example of transmasc specific oppression.
not to be uncharitable. but im about to be uncharitable.
"T ruined my singing voice!!" <- this person was never a good singer to begin with
like. yeah. relearning how to sing with a new voice is work. but also. singing. in general. being a good singer is WORK. if you weren't putting in work before. well you were probably. decent. but you weren't. good.
sorry.
imagine thinking that trans men are inherently bad or evil or predatory on the basis of gendered privilege and societal power structures. cringe
Yikes, there’s a lot of discourse going on in the trans masc tags today, it seems. I’m gonna rant so just block/mute if you’re tired of hearing it.
I feel like a lot of transmasc folks on here (especially white transmasc folks) are more interested in playing oppression olympics than actually uplifting other trans and queer people. And no, this is not just limited to “transmasc v trans femme, who is more discriminated against” because first of all that’s fucking garbage. Some of you lack the basic readings comprehension skills to understand that there are different types of discrimination that apply to both trans men and trans women—visibly or invisibly—and that they are ALL considered transphobic and violent. Sitting here and typing out how you’re more oppressed than trans women is fucking stupid, and I say this as a trans masc person.
Which brings me to point 2. A lot of you don’t know that there is a time and a place for your personal dysphoria. LET ME BE CLEAR— no one is telling you that you can’t make your own posts, tiktoks, etc describing your personal gender dysphoria and how you deal with that. I am SPECIFICALLY talking about when you hijack someone else’s post/tiktok/etc to derail or invalidate it with your own personal dysphoria.
I saw a lighthearted tiktok about a transmasc dude making a joke about how he can eat whatever he wants before bottoming (implying he is not only ok with vaginal intercourse but also making a nice comment about his body and experiences). You bet your ass his comment section was filled with people snarking like “ok but MY dysphoria” “couldn’t be me” “I can’t even look down there” OK?! No one asked you. This tiktok wasn’t FOR you. It was for other transmasc folks who are ok with their vagina. Keep scrolling, have that conversation in your own tiktok. I see plenty of them from dudes who have similar body opinions of themselves.
There’s a lot I could say about these same transmasc folks policing who is and isn’t trans due to the level of discomfort they feel on a daily basis, and it’s bullshit. That’s classic cis shit. You don’t have to prove you’re trans by showing how much you hate the gender you’re transing out of, or by how well much you perform cis ideas of male/female. I did too much time pretending to be a hyper feminine woman to turn around and pretend to be a hyper masculine man.
Y’all complain transmasc folks don’t have communities, but every time I’ve tried to join one of them it’s filled with people trying to play oppression and suffering olympics. Being trans is already hard. It doesn’t have to mean suffering. Don’t alienate yourselves from other trans masc and trans folks. Don’t alienate yourselves from queer folks.
discourse time again, woohoo.
(atp my blog is for discourse so. hit me.)
please please please. i’m looking at a specific group here.
stop taking intersex terms and claiming them as yours. “cagab” is an intersex thing. it refers to being surgically altered as an infant or small child to fit into a false sex binary. it refers to lifelong medical trauma.
and while we’re at it, regular old “agab” too. fuck off.
signed, an really fucking tired intersex transman.
"transmasc discourse" its discourse to you. The otherness of being trans in a cisnormative society, the disconnect between what's expected of you based on your sex and how you actually feel about yourself regarding gender and the struggle to express yourself and finally be happy as transgender reads just as well to me from a transmasc perspective as it does from a transfem one.
The idea that transmasculine people benefit from patriarchy and misogyny is bunk when you consider that transphobia manifests as people not taking trans people as the gender they present as, and transphobia tends to be a default in cisnormative spaces. I would wager that transmen are still often victims of misogyny due to that expression of transphobia. The idea that transmen transition, become one of the guys and kick down the ladder for other queer identities because they assimilate as "oppressors" and inherently become a part of the problem is absurd and deranged.
Transmasc people are as queer as gay people, bi people, transfem people, non-binary people, pan people - they are a part of the queer community, and I'm absolutely against othering them or turning them into intra-community "oppressors".
If we're talking about assimilationists, they exist along all axes of queerness and aren't inherent to the transmasc experience. If we're talking about misogyny, transmasc people tend to suffer from it due to transphobia. I've heard for years about bi people and ace people and trans people "harming the community", I'm not about to roll over and see the same thing happen to transmasculine people.
In closing:
[ID: A screenshot of a post by tomohawk12345 that reads "This sexual minority isn't part of the sexual minority group", with two emojis with buck teeth and glasses after the text. End ID.]
yk theres a good reason i dont engage in identity discourse beyond just "i dont wanna". its because trying to make an argument about someone's identity-- especially when that someone isnt you-- makes you run the risk of misunderstanding and misidentifying the specific identity youre trying to argue about. the easy-- and correct-- answer is very simple: "not my circus not my monkeys". stay in your goddamn lane and let people do their thing. it doesnt need to involve you.