#twitterstorians

[mycandlesblog]

Why Are UK Conservatives Called Tories?

The Conservative Party in the UK is known colloquially as the Tory Party. Its supporters are generally called Tories. Why?  Many Americans m

[imperium-romanum]

Perspective | When bad actors twist history, historians take to Twitter. That’s a good thing.

When bad actors twist history, historians fight back on Twitter and other nonacademic platforms. It's necessary.

History can be a weapon or a shield. Almost since the first historians, politicians for good and ill have tried to manipulate the past to support their agendas in the present. The first Roman emperor, Octavian Augustus Caesar, appealed to a sanitized version of history to cloak his dictatorship as a republic — a tactic also adopted by Mussolini. In ancient Egypt, Thutmose III hated the pharaoh Hatshepsut so much that he literally attempted to erase her from history by destroying her images and cartouches. More recently, the Southern myth of the “Lost Cause” distorted historical fact to try to rehabilitate a war fought for the right to own others and to justify continued racism. And then there’s Donald Trump. He is, as Eric Alterman put it in the New Yorker, the “king not only of lies but also of ahistorical assertions.”

Historians have been complicit in these misuses of history, but more often they have held the line against simplistic politicization. The Internet age makes this challenging. The abuse of history for present aims is dangerously ubiquitous, and false and manipulated versions of the past can spread easily. It was inevitable that the abuse would migrate to Twitter, a free-for-all of digital lawlessness. Historians have not stood idly by, however. Their Twitter threads have emerged as a response, with scholars countering abuses in multiple series of linked tweets that provide the actual history, context, sources and often additional reading. The phenomenon has grown visible enough that there’s even been a backlash, most recently expressed in an opinion piece in the Chronicle of Higher Education by a literature professor who dismisses public engagement by historians as “pedantic.” It is not. It is a valuable public good, a way to “show the receipts” in something close to real time.

Continue reading

[mbhagavan]

It. Is. Here.  Prepare yourselves. 

https://www.amazon.in/India-Cold-War-Manu-Bhagavan/dp/0670092592/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=manu+bhagavan&qid=1565356541&s=gateway&sr=8-1

[sassy-cicero-says]

🗓74/100✔ . No amount of concealer can conceal how tired I am 😴 I spent the afternoon at the law library on campus helping move books onto new shelves. It was a good workout, that's for sure! I think I'll sleep well tonight and will hopefully be refreshed and ready to tackle more work around the house tomorrow. . . . #classics #phdlife #phdchat #work #twitterstorians #selfie #rareselfie #me #makeup #hudabeauty #tartecosmetics #shapetapeconcealer #sotired #stillhappy https://www.instagram.com/p/B1d8KGRhXdU/?igshid=xnuor56ph7ae

[fyeahsharonrooney]

Barbara the rubbish soothsayer and her dodgy pals are heading back to Munty for a third series of Zapped!

And my suggestion to the writers (and a couple of my favourite telly historians - one of whom had a cameo in the last series) went down a storm, I’m pleased to say!

[navyhistory]

The full 3-part series on "Tweeting" the Quasi-War is now available to view. We hope you enjoyed reading some tweets, laughing a little, and learning a little naval and political history in the process.

http://www.usnavymuseums.org/tweeting-naval-history-quasi-war/

[mycandlesblog]

The British Monarchy and the Media in Historical Perspective

Writing in The Independent  16/12/22 Sean O'Grady refers to the revelations of the new Harry/Meghan Netflix series as "a tsunami of princely

The British monarchy and the mass media have long existed in symbiotic relationship. The royals benefit in popular opinion from the sentimental rubbish the tabloids spew forth on an almost daily basis. 

On the downside for them, the media can turn rogue when it promises to boost their profit margins. For the tabloids there is no downside. Stories about the royals sell, toadying or tacky. Harry blames the media for Meghan's miscarriage. Accurate or not, it wouldn't be the first time media coverage made royal lives miserable. Rail against it all you like. Nothing is likely to change.

[mycandlesblog]

Hunting the Feejee Mermaid: from Charleston to London

I took a trip across London not long ago to visit the Horniman Museum and Gardens. The Horniman contains much of interest in its natural hi