Are Books with Pan Rep Popular? (and how often is the pan rep talked about?)
Last year a book with canon pan rep got quite popular, but the pan rep was rarely brought up, but when it was, it was mislabeled as bi. This happens a lot, and it got me wondering how many books with pan rep could be considered “popular”, and how often the pan rep is talked about in comparison to how often the book is talked about.
So I took to Goodreads. I don’t know if there’s a consensus on what constitutes a “popular” book, but I decided at least 10,000 ratings. The pan rep I’m including in this is canon (stated in or out of text) pan main characters, love interests, and side characters.
18 books fit this. 5 books are standalones, 2 books are from one duology, 4 books are from one series, and 7 books are from one series. 3 characters are main characters, 2 are love interests, and 5 are side characters. All but 2 books have out of text confirmation.
I break it down by ratings; highest to lowest. I include date, ratings, reviews, reviews that mention pan rep. (Some might argue older books will have more ratings, but while the ratings consistently descend, the publication dates do not consistently ascend.)
City of Bones by Cassandra Clare (2007) has 1m+ ratings. 66k+ reviews, 1 mentions pan.
Six of Crows by Leigh Bardugo (2015) has 557k+ ratings. 64k+ reviews, 13 mention pan.
The Invisible Life of Addie LaRue by V.E. Schwab (2020) has 408k+ ratings. 63k+ reviews, 113 mention pan.
Crooked Kingdom by Leigh Bardugo (2016) has 369k+ ratings. 44k+ reviews, 3 mention pan.
City of Heavenly Fire by Cassandra Clare (2014) has 337k+ ratings. 25k+ reviews, 1 mentions pan.
Every Heart A Doorway by Seanan McGuire (2016) has 89k+ ratings. 15k+ reviews, 5 mention pan.
The Bane Chronicles by Cassandra Clare (2014) has 81k+ ratings. 7k+ reviews, 1 mentions pan.
The Upside of Unrequited by Becky Albertalli (2017) has 71k+ ratings. 9k+ reviews, 300+ mention pan.
Tales from the Shadowhunter Academy by Cassandra Clare (2016) has 55k+ ratings. 6k+ reviews, 1 mentions pan.
Chain of Gold by Cassandra Clare (2020) has 65k+ ratings. 10k+ reviews, 0 mention pan.
Radio Silence by Alice Oseman (2016) has 51k+ ratings. 10k+ reviews, 25 mention pan.
Down Among the Sticks and Bones by Seanan McGuire (2016) has 38k+ ratings. 6k+ reviews, 9 mention pan.
The Red Scrolls of Magic by Cassandra Clare (2019) has 36k+ ratings. 5k+ reviews, 9 mention pan.
Beneath the Sugar Sky by Seanan McGuire (2018) has 29k+ ratings. 5k+ reviews, 1 mentions pan.
Ghosts of the Shadow Market by Cassandra Clare (2019) has 27k+ ratings. 3k+ reviews, 3 mention pan.
I Wish You All the Best by Mason Deaver (2019) has 25k+ ratings. 5k+ reviews, 25 mention pan.
Solitaire by Alice Oseman (2014) has 18k+ ratings. 3k+ reviews, 4 mention pan.
Come Tumbling Down by Seanan McGuire (2020) has 16k+ ratings. 3k+ reviews, 3 mention pan.
Clearly, pan rep just isn’t talked about or celebrated, even when the book is “popular”. Even with The Upside of Unrequited having the highest number of reviews that acknowledge the pan rep, it’s still under 5% of all the reviews.
I’ve heard “you can’t blame people for saying a pan character is bi if it wasn’t said in text” before, but when you stop treating bi (or “bi/pan”; the majority of the pan mentions for some of these books are “bi/pan”) as the default mspec identity and stop labeling based on assumptions instead of actually checking for confirmation, this “unavoidable” pan erasure goes away.
With The Invisible Life of Addie LaRue, both Addie and Henry are canonically pan, but neither is stated on page. Yet in the reviews that mention pan, the understanding is Henry is pan and Addie is bi. Seemingly because Henry’s attraction is described as not being about gender (paraphrasing) and Addie’s is described as being toward any gender (paraphrasing).
This conclusion drawn by readers shows that mspec expression in general is automatically bi, but when specifically described as “regardless of gender”, then it’s more acceptable to suggest pan. Aside from that being restrictive, there isn’t a single, universal/innate description for each label.
Since I checked how often pan rep is acknowledged in “popular books that happen to have pan rep”, I checked the same for “books that are popular for having pan rep”. For this, I Googled “books with pansexual characters”. The pan rep is on-page in all but 2 books, main characters in 9 books, and love interests in 2.
Seven Ways We Lie by Riley Redgate (2016) has 1,130 reviews, 159 mention pan.
Ship It by Brita Lundin (2018) has 865 reviews, 50 mention pan.
In the Ravenous Dark by A.M. Strickland (2021) has 718 reviews, 201 mention pan.
Verona Comics by Jennifer Dugan (2020) has 2k+ ratings and 572 reviews; 27 mention pan.
Final Draft by Riley Redgate (2018) has 481 reviews, 81 mention pan.
Miss Meteor by Anna-Marie McLemore and Tehlor Kay Mejia (2020) has 467 reviews, 92 mention pan.
The Brightsiders by Jen Wilde (2018) has 463 reviews, 42 mention pan.
Crownchasers by Rebecca Coffindaffer (2020) has 390 reviews, 20 mention pan.
Out on Good Behavior by Dahlia Adler (2016) has 218 reviews, 62 mention pan.
The Melody of You and Me by M. Hollis (2017) has 175 reviews, 55 mention pan.
Soft on Soft by Mina Waheed (2018) has 155 reviews, 24 mention pan.
While the percentage of reviews that acknowledge the pan rep in these books is higher than the “popular” books, it’s still not even half of the reviews. Even the books that are consistently recommended for pan rep, some of which have been for years, significantly lack reviews that discuss said pan rep.
How can a book be widely known and recommended for pan rep, and still lack acknowledgment and conversations about the pan rep?
Why is pan book rep in general just not talked about?