This piece is for everyone tired of selective justice dressed up as “international law.”
Yes, a tribunal for aggression against Ukraine makes sense. The ICC can’t easily prosecute the leadership crime of starting the war, so a new court is being built to close that loophole. But here’s the problem: the same European and Global North leaders cheering “accountability” for Russia go quiet, hedge, or enable impunity when the victims are Palestinians, when coercion targets Venezuela, and when bombs and strike threats hang over Iran.
So I’m asking the uncomfortable question out loud: Is international law a universal shield or a weapon used only against enemies? If aggression is the “supreme crime,” it can’t depend on geography, race, religion, or political ideology. Either we prosecute aggression consistently, or we admit the “rules-based order” is just branding.
Read it, share it, argue with it — but don’t look away. READ THE FULL STORY HERE:↓
“The West’s Ukraine Tribunal Exposes Its Hypocrisy on Palestine, Iran, and Venezuela”
Reblog, comment and subscribe to my Medium Blog.













