F1 grey wolf x poodle crosses bred by Erik Zimen as part of a study on dog domestication.
Footage from BBC Horizon, 1969
art blog(derogatory)
Not today Justin

oozey mess

#extradirty

★

PR's Tumblrdome
Stranger Things

JBB: An Artblog!

Andulka
let's talk about Bridgerton tea, my ask is open
Misplaced Lens Cap
Acquired Stardust
DEAR READER
One Nice Bug Per Day
dirt enthusiast
YOU ARE THE REASON
PUT YOUR BEARD IN MY MOUTH
i don't do bad sauce passes

izzy's playlists!
2025 on Tumblr: Trends That Defined the Year
seen from United States
seen from Germany
seen from United States
seen from United Kingdom
seen from Brazil
seen from Chile
seen from United States

seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Germany
seen from Italy
seen from United Kingdom

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from United States

seen from Australia

seen from United States

seen from Singapore
@thepoodlepack
F1 grey wolf x poodle crosses bred by Erik Zimen as part of a study on dog domestication.
Footage from BBC Horizon, 1969
Full offense but if you believe asexual people don’t belong in the LGBT+ community you can fuck off my blog
Hey guys, this isn’t dog related but I figured some of you guys are losers like me, and so I wanted to let yall here know that I started running a discord server for one of my non-dog hyperfixations, Batman and his family. We’d love for you to join us!
https://discord.gg/5ThVpFveaj
the most effective means of preventing dog homelessness are 1) providing material support to impoverished and marginalized pet owners and 2) preventing and addressing behavioral issues before they become cause for relinquishment
but that’s far less fun and takes way more effort and human compassion than self-righteously chirping “adopt don’t shop!”
there are a lot of people in the notes of this post making really condescending comments about spaying and neutering pets, and like, all else aside, i want to show you guys one thing.
this is a map showing the ratio of puppies ending up in shelters and rescues by state (x). it is a useful metric for measuring which areas are ending up with a surplus of unwanted puppies. yellow states have a high ratio of unwanted puppies, blue states have a low ratio of unwanted puppies.
this is a map (x) showing the percentage of people living in poverty in each state. darker-colored states have a higher percentage of people living in poverty.
do you notice any similarities between these two maps?
smug lectures on social media are not a meaningful solution to the underlying issue here.
if you want to address dog homelessness, please consider supporting organizations like Beyond Fences, Kane’s Krusade, and other local resources that are providing non-judgmental, material support to dog owners in need.
Cuddle buddies
How do you go about finding a certified trainer? I’ve tried and it feels like theres so many certifiers I’m not really sure which ones to look for
Alright, well, you don’t have to be certified to know what you’re doing, really. But you should have experience that you can show, and getting a certification is a great way to do that.
You’ve got your classics like CPDT-KA and CPDT-KSA which you can learn about here.
Also there’s the CGC Evaluator qualification which will also get you some clout, and that’s here.
A cert is not everything! Don’t trust trainers just based on a certification. It’s simply notable that “famed” dog trainer Cesar Millan doesn’t have one.
What's wrong with goldenpoodles? I'm genuinely curious because almost all of my dogs are mixed breeds and behave fine. So I'm curious if there's something else I'm missing
jeez this feels like bait but u kno what, you got me
alright, so it goes like this. the doodle really began with a guy in australia being like i need the temperament of a lab for a guide dog but these ppl are allergic to dogs, so i need a poodle bc they have hair, not fur. so he bred em together. years later he’s like damn that was a mistake.
now, why, exactly? alright so first of all he only needed that mix bc labs on average tend to adapt better to situations that are largely exclusive to service dog work than poodles do. i can go into what this means at a later date, but that’s basically how it is. but either way, people jumped on this creation and it kinda spiraled out of control. soon, poodles were being bred by everyone and every breed. suddenly, they were a marketing scam more then they were a dog breed.
oh theyre hypoallergenic! all of them, all the time cause zero allergies! look theyre so much better than poodles! theyre friendly and easy to train, not like poodles of course, just like labs! they’re better than labs bc none of them shed, ever! they’re super healthy bc breeding labs and poodles together wipes out all their health problems, of course!
lies, lies lies. the aussie guy, whose name i’m not going to look up bc i’m lazy but who you can find if you google creator of doodles, straight up says that even the first litter(s) of labradoodles he bred had puppies that the people he bred them for were allergic to. he very carefully tested the litter and the reaction the person had before placing a puppy that was not going to hurt them.
think of the punnet squares we all learned about in 5th grade science class. you draw the squares and one parent has two fur genes and the other parent has two hair genes and what do you get? well if you have four puppies, one might have hairhair and the next one might have hairfur and the next one might have furhair and the next one might have furfur. and so guess what? only hairhair pup is going to be the best choice for allergic people. additionally, you can see why the non-shedding thing can be bullshit, and that in particular is also a guessing game. you may be able to test allergy sufferers against the pups, but that does not necessarily mean they won’t shed. hairfur, for example, may be a good choice for some allergic people, but perhaps they’ve got just enough fur to shed anyway. also, lets look at salukis (and frankly, most long-haired sighthounds). salukis are still considered dogs with fur, not hair. they also still shed, even though it’s just a little. and yet they’re still considered good for allergy sufferers.
(ps poodles do actually shed. but they shed like humans shed. your hair comes out, doesn’t it? like, esp folks with long hair, aren’t people always complaining how you clog the shower drain? yeah, like that. ALSO obviously the situation is more complicated then super simple punnet squares and as an ex-groomer i have something to say about doodle coats but i’m going to save that for later, put a pin in it.)
oh and wait a hot minute there. i said best choice, didn’t i, not hypoallergenic. well, that’s because no dog is hypoallergenic. poodles, and a few other dog breeds, they have hair, like we do. but the thing is both humans and breeds with hair still produce the dander, though they’re different kinds. breeds with hair happen to produce the least amount possible that dogs can produce, which is why they’re a better choice for allergy sufferers, but that’s still not a guarantee. my roommate Dakota is allergic to dogs. if i don’t wash my dogs for an extended period of time (which has never happened, ever, in my life, idk what ur talking about), thus giving the chance for the dander my dogs still produce, he will have a very, very mild reaction when touching them. it can be countered by him washing his hands after touching them and also me just giving them a fucking bath, i need to stop forgetting, but still, there you go. ALSO people might not be allergic to dogs bc of their dander. they might be allergic to the saliva of dogs, which poodles or any other breed with hair still produces about the same as other dogs. so, yeah, not hypoallergenic, not at all.
the people who taut their hypoallergenic dogs for sale largely don’t do the testing required to check if they’re actually providing a dog to someone who won’t react to it. not acceptable at all.
so, labs are friendly and easy to train right? not at all like poodles, right? no. absolutely incorrect. some labs are friendly and easy to train. some labs, a lot of them when they’re puppies, are nightmare fuel. personally, i have a theory that everyone’s vision of labs in their heads are either a) service dogs or b) those old labs who are slightly pudgy (or morbidly obsess, which is a different topic) and who are graying in the face and just want to lounge around because they’re seniors now. alright, so here’s why thats bad. labs are a working breed. a retrieving breed. they’re supposed to be bulky and strong and driven. service dogs are highly trained, to a point that most pet dogs will never see, and if you see them with their actual disabled handler, they’ll probably be around 2.5 yrs of age and out of their most wild days. old labs are well. old. sleepy. maybe a bit achey. and well out of their most wild days. oh, and it’s the same type of thing with goldens by the way, the other most popular doodle type. poodles are also easy to train, especially if their parents have a decent temperament. they’re all about equal if you actually start training them when they’re puppies and just pay for some training classes, like everyone should. in the puppy classes i’m in right now, Euphoria is leaps and bounds ahead of doodles, goldens, and labs that are her age or older. I train her properly and she’s got amazing parents. that’s it, that’s the trick. not breed, not necessarily, and def not in this case.
I am once again going to say that labs and goldens are more often used as service dogs than poodles because of their adaptability, but it’s the ability to adapt to situations that most pet dogs will never have to worry about.
jeez this is a long post. i’ve still got more to cover too. alright, on to super healthy, or “hybrid vigor” as the nerds call it. uhh, it’s bullshit. thank u for ur time.
okay, but actually why on gods green earth would breeding two completely different breeds with little to no research make them super healthy? now i want to preface this with i’m (generally) pro-outcross projects. Euphoria’s dad is half mini poodle and half standard poodle, which isn’t technically an outcross bc all the variations are of the same breed, but if we’re going by genetic diversity alone minis and standards are different enough to actually be different breeds.
so, to be clear, outcrosses, given the proper thought and planning: good, results in healthier dogs (see: lua dals). randomly breeding two very different breeds together with no planning other than to sell the puppies to randos who won’t continue the outcross: bad. especially when you’re doing it to cash in and don’t health test at all, or don’t health test the major health problems with both breeds (if you’re doing an f2 breeding or anything like that). no the poodle’s health problems don’t get canceled out by the goldens or labs or whatever the other party’s health problems are, and vice versa. and yeah, i’ve looked at a lot of doodle breeder’s websites and yeah, most of them don’t health test at all, or at least don’t health test properly. do you know i own one doodle and currently live with another? yeah, i got them both from breeders and do you know how much health testing their parents got? if your answer is none, good job, you’ve been paying attention. in my defense, i was like 13, i didn’t know what i was doing.
alright, so those are the big points. this is kinda gonna be just... a mix of my other complaints. here we go, hope you’re ready for more. argument the first: i feel like it’s pretty disrespectful to reputable breeders. now, i actually have two reasons why that is. reason one: most reputable poodle breeders don’t want their breeding stock bred with other breeds, for various reasons. i’ve even met a few who used to be okay with it and then as the doodle scam got bigger and more out of control, they stopped being okay with it, even to the breeders who they had been fine with it in the past. that means a lot of doodle breeders out there have their breeding stock because they scammed poodle breeders into giving them pet quality, not breeding quality, dogs or because they’re getting their stock from non-reputable breeders. i also feel it’s disrespectful to breeders who are actually trying to create new breeds. quite frankly, a breed with the size, strength, and adaptability of a lab or golden that doesn’t shed and that has the train-ability of a poodle, lab, or golden sounds pretty interesting to me. did you know you can actually make that breed? and it wouldn’t be a cross with unpredictable... well, everything. it would actually be a true dog breed.
Look at Silken Windhounds and Biewer Terriers who began both development in the 1980s. Biewer Terriers were recognized by the AKC this year, and Silken Windhounds still haven’t been. And yeah, that’s the problem isn’t it? Making a real new breed takes a lot of time, planning, and care. People would rather just cash in. I think it’s sad and I think it’s disrespectful to the breeders who do work so hard to make actual new breeds.
and finally, unpin being an ex-groomer goddamnit. guess what? doodles are awful to groom! they’re terrible on the grooming tables because people want to have in both ways: they want a dog that doesnt shed at all and they want a dog who doesn’t need to be groomed. well guess what, that dog doesn’t exist and you can have it only one way. and also, bring back the goddamn punnet squares because a lot of doodles have awful coats. if you have hairfur and furhair over there, guess what, their coat fucking sucks bc it’s not meant to be like that. it wants to mat bc hair but also it wants the mats to slide out bc short-ish fur but its too thick for the mats to slide out bc thick hair. and yes its more complicated then this and that means its often more awful then this. its awful, it makes me want to cry. and maybe it’s slightly easier to get away with it with a shorthaired dog like a lab, or, you know what, even a golden, okay, even a slightly long haired dog like a golden but people are doodling akitas? border collies? bernese fucking mountain dogs? i am crying. i am crying right now as i type this.
lets do a sum up to this disaster of a post. look, i don’t go out there attacking or yelling at every doodle or every doodle owner i see, alright? or any of them really. i might engage in conversation to one that’s interested, but that’s it. i love my doodly Isis, okay? shes tiny and she’s adorable and I love her more than life and i will never, ever get another doodle. i don’t like the way they’ve gotten so prolific, i don’t like the reasons they’re now widespread, and i don’t like almost all of the people that create them, including the ones i’ve literally given my (parents) money to in the past. i wish they were better but i just cannot approve of them, especially not in the environment they exist in now. that said, i do support them in their original use case as assistance dogs, and i do not care about them if they’re shelter dogs.
She’s a star
What do you have to support the fact that he abuses dogs? I've never seen him abuse one. Ever.
So is he to just let the dog bite him?
If you loom in an extremely threatening way over anyone, not just a dog, when they are in a vulnerable position, yes you should just let them bite you because you made a very stupid decisions.
The question presupposes that the dog is the antagonizer in this situation. The dog is in a position of defense, not attack.
“Should he just let the dog bite him?” is the wrong question. If someone showed a clip of a child playing with his bike, and a stray dog running up and assaulting him viciously, and he began to strike the dog to defend himself, then the question would be valid. What else should the child do, but to begin defending himself?
This is not the situation. Millan presents himself as a power-figure, one to be feared. He immediately presents a threat by positioning himself in a threatening position with his body language. The dog is on the defense, because he wants his food, and he fears it will be taken from him.
Then, Millan strikes. The dog’s fears are affirmed, and he snaps back in defense, and as a warning. But note that as he snaps, HE IS BACKING AWAY. The dog does NOT want this fight. He does NOT want to attack him. He JUST wants to eat in peace and he is backing away, but attempting to defend himself.
In short, if Millan doesn’t want to get bit, he should probably not antagonize a reactive dog.
BOOM
In this gif he genuinely seems to be provoking the fuck out of the dog, violently. He seems to be hitting the dog, and even if he’s just feinting… that’s awful.
I’ve watched Victoria Sitwell (also dogs) and Jackson Galaxy (cats). They both present themselves in the animal’s space to see what reaction they get. But I’ve never seen either of them come anywhere near hitting an animal. Honestly, what the hell is this asshole’s problem.
I’ve only seen Jackson but if the cat is aggressive he backs the fuck off. He does NOT strike a cat. For any reason. Even being attacked or scratched he thinks about how HE made the mistake and how to fix it.
<p>^^^ also this. He’s very good at not antagonizing aggressive cats at all, but when they ARE aggressive he would let a cat bite or scratch him before he so much as touched it, let alone hit it. </p><p> I spent a few minutes on google, to refamiliarize myself with Victoria, because it’s been a while since I watched “It’s Me or the Dog” – but immediately I found an article asking readers to compare these two specifically, and whoa Ceasar is terrible and should stop. </p><p> FYI, Victoria has never been bitten by a dog. Google’s pretty firm on that. And when dogs bite people in the family, she recognizes where the bad behavior is – their adult owners. Ceasar on the other hand appears to be operating on the pseudoscience (and outright myth) of “alpha males”. Victoria uses positive reinforcement, in the casual rather than the literal sense, like treats and figuring out what the dog needs emotionally from its owners; Ceasar intimidates dogs into compliance, which will just deepen the fear and insecurity being displayed by the dog in this gif. </p><p> Here’s <a href=“http://www.animalplanet.com/tv-shows/its-me-or-dog/training-tips/child-dog-safety/”>a very brief post from an interview with her</a>, it looks like, on child-dog safety that illustrates her point of view.</p> <p>Meanwhile Ceasar is apparently a jackass who uses choke collars and shock collars. There’s no excuse for that, ever.</p>
FUCK Cesar Millan.
Wow this is so gross
Okay, so I’m not a dog expert, but I actually watched this episode and I remember it very vividly. You CANNOT JUDGE this situation by the gifs alone, so here’s some background:
The dog is the problem in the situation. She is “the antagonizer.”
The dog, Holly, was hyper protective of food and territory and would not let ANYONE near her food without lunging and snarling at them, and the family had a baby. You don’t have to approach this dog in an aggressive position, she will threaten you anyway. Caesar had spent a good amount of time trying to give and take food from the dog, but it led to this confrontation:
(BLOOD WARNING)
The dog snarls at Caesar so he jabs at the dog’s throat, mimicking warning nips that dogs use. He didn’t hit the dog like the gif suggests and the dog getting aggressive around food has been a continual problem that he’s trying to break her of. When Caesar stands for too long between her and the food bowl, and he’s NOT IN AN AGGRESSIVE POSITION, she lunges and BITES HIM AND DOESN’T LET GO. He fights her off, then stands over her, trying to get her to realize who is in control of the situation. He has a deep puncture wound bleeding and still doesn’t back down.
What this video doesn’t show is that he tells the family he cannot comfortably let them keep Holly while they have a baby, so they allow him to take her to his facility to rehabilitate her. She spends a month or so there, spending a lot of time around calm dogs and getting healthy amounts of exercise to burn off energy. Eventually she becomes friendly with the dogs but ultimately the family did give her up out of concern for their baby.
I have no problem with anyone disagreeing with Caesar’s methods, I go back and forth on them myself, but don’t ignore the entire truth of the situation. Slander only weakens your argument. If you want to argue against Caesar’s methods, then offer suggestions on how to deal with a dog that won’t let you near her food without threatening to attack.
New information, please read ^^
Okay you very clearly do not know anything about canine body language. That’s fine, it’s not your fault.
What Millan is doing throughout this entire video is actually aggressive by dog body language, which a trainer should know at least a little.
Prolonged eye contact especially with unfamiliar or untrusting dogs can be extremely unnerving. How would you feel if someone you don’t know well or you do not trust, or both, in Holly’s situation, went right up to you and stared straight into your eyes? You would feel extremely uncomfortable correct? Well, that’s how Holly feels.
Look here, she looks away from Millan. This is a calming signal in dogs, something that a dog does when it wants to lessen the arousal state in an encounter.
And then look at this. At this point, Holly is not growling at all but because she is not “submissive” Millan leans over her head. Holly is already in a very vulnerable position. Her head is down, she has no way to defend herself quickly. She just wants to eat. But Millan takes advantage of her vulnerable positions and leans over her, putting her in an even scarier position. Look how tense his body is too. Barking and lunging dogs are really saying “keep away from me, I don’t want you near me.” They’re giving you a heads up that they don’t want you near them, giving you a fair warning. A still, tense dog is much more dangerous than a lunging and barking dog because that dog is conserving energy and is readying itself to attack you. It’s not going to give you a heads up. That is what Millan is displaying right now and Holly can tell.
So Holly has already been intimidated by this unfamiliar, untrustworthy man, he has her in a very vulnerable position and he is displaying all the signs of an attack. So Holly does that barking, growling and lunging thing. She growls, she nips him on the knee, she says “back off I don’t want you near me.”
And Millan strikes her instead.
You might see here that Holly goes right back to eating. She doesn’t want to engage with Millan, her thought process is basically “okay I’ve told him to back off plenty of times right he should just let me eat now.”
He doesn’t.
Here she is again, backing up and showing her teeth. Millan is still tense, still ready to strike. Holly is basically saying “hey you see these things!? They’re sharp, they’re my weapon I can hurt you with them but I don’t want to but stop hurting me! Just let me eat.”
Here she pulls back her teeth and displays more calming behaviors. That paw lift right there? That’s a calming behavior. When it doesn’t work and Millan keeps back her into a corner, she bares her teeth again, in yet another warning.
When her two other warnings aren’t received, she lunges at him. But this lunge is very slow. It’s actually another warning, probably to give another warning nip. Dogs are fast. If she really wanted to bite him here, she would have.
See all this lip licking, looking away and blinking she’s doing? More calming signals. Lying down down is also a calming signal and so is yawning, which she is doing in the last screenshot. Holly actually signals beautifully, it’s extremely upsetting that Millan isn’t reading her signals.
Looking away, lip licking, blinking. Again, more calming signals. She’s still very scared and responsibly too. This man is still in her face and he just hit her.
Millan calls these two shots “relaxed.” They’re not. She’s showing the whites of her eyes, which is a stress signal and she is looking towards her owner, saying “this guy is scaring me, can you help?”
She bites him only after he invades her personal space again. Imagine you just want to eat and an unfamiliar and intimidating man is continuously threatening you and has even hit you already. You try to calm him down with almost every method in the book but it still isn’t working. He is still keeping you away from your food, still very close to you and then he reaches out and pats your cheek. Say you have a knife on you and you haven’t used it yet but this man is still near you, still invading your space and you are terrified. So you jump up and stab him with the knife.
Holly bites him and holds on for only about three seconds before letting go. And make no mistake, despite the fact that he kicked her to get her to let go, she chose to let go herself. The kick he gave her was not strong and if she really tried to hurt him and hang on, she really would have.
After the bite, he stands directly over there and then even has the gall to stand there and say “I didn’t see that coming.” If Millan knew anything about canine body language, he would have seen that coming.
These are some good articles about dog body language and behaviors: click1, click2, click3
And here’s an amazing article written by a professional and certified dog trainer (which Millan is not by the way) on resource guarding, the behavior that Holly is exhibiting.
Sploot
8 week stack photos of Euphie!
Look who’s coming home Friday
Sassy baby
Look who’s coming home Friday
poodle werewolf
Puppy? Puppy? Puppy?
Fun fact I tell Isis she sucks at least three times a day bc she’s a doodle and I hate doodles