We as a society need to get chill with stealing art again because I really miss those amvs to Linkin park and Cascada what were like 100 fanarts someone found of Sasuke on the internet all separated by different transitions

Discoholic 🪩
untitled
The Stonewall Inn

Jar Jar Binks Fan Club
noise dept.

❣ Chile in a Photography ❣
Monterey Bay Aquarium
No title available
icyghini twinkie
Show & Tell

shark vs the universe
"I'm Dorothy Gale from Kansas"
art blog(derogatory)

Origami Around
d e v o n
todays bird
he wasn't even looking at me and he found me

pixel skylines
Keni
Cosmic Funnies
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Malaysia
seen from United States
seen from United States
seen from Egypt

seen from United States
seen from Singapore

seen from Malaysia
seen from Türkiye

seen from United States
seen from Chile
seen from Ukraine
seen from United States

seen from Uruguay

seen from India

seen from Malaysia
seen from Italy

seen from Singapore
@thosemintcookies
We as a society need to get chill with stealing art again because I really miss those amvs to Linkin park and Cascada what were like 100 fanarts someone found of Sasuke on the internet all separated by different transitions
Ok so my two cents on the vampire show having watched S3 is like
I very much liked it. I read the first book but otherwise I'm show-only.
It's a vast departure in tone and pov because we're getting it from Lestat's pov. Not to mention after 77 years of being pretty much alone and probably on the internet way too much.
Are we forgetting all of s2 where Louis' memories are unraveling and we see where he was also selfish and seeing lestat through rose tinted glasses? Where the whole 2 seasons Claudia was begging to be prioritized, where here stories and feelings were editorialized? Where her memory was used to recraft her tragedy and neglect into something that absolves Louis of his own guilt, when he knew he was dooming her to a volatile existence? As was explained to him at her turning and several times after?
I understand that there may be more of a desire to have seen some relationships developing, and I totally understand the desire to have more screentime with Armand, letting Daniel be more clever, people not getting what's going on with the Great Conversion - these are also threads that were planted in iwtv and if there was more of a focus on the modern day and rumination on the past, centring trauma and abuse it's because these are the things haunting Lestat.
In this continuance we have the framing device of the failures with Daniel on the road with them filming a docu. It's a separate thing, which will highlight different aspects of the characters but I don't see any where these characters were entirely butchered?
I even liked Gabriella and her weird little boy mom/gf angle. I liked that she was unlikeable and I love the concept of her character where she was unable to escape her life and tired of being a mom by like her 8th pregnancy. She is a groomer but her possessiveness is complex. It comes from also Lestat being codependent for too long and wanting to have her around, which neither of them are equipped to deal with what with Gabriella never having been able to choose anything for herself and Lestat not having been able to see himself beyond his belittled existence in his human family. I would have wanted to see her tmasc swag but I also think that as she uses sex to control her son, it's still a compelling enough abuse/codependency angle. The reckoning with the grotesquerie of it was a really powerful scene, and relatable to me as someone coming to terms with control-telated trauma from.my own family which was not sexual, sure, but it's always hard to admit when the people you love have harmed you.
Its also not uncharacteristic for the Chronicles. In iwtv we are also introduced to this sort of thing -grooming and incest. Tuan and Quang Pham are having threesomes with each other. There is a lot of implied child sexual abuse going on. There is even a remark where Louis had a 16 year old lover when he was "older" than that. People speculate on Claudia being Louis' child bride, which in the book is kind of a thing. This was a temperature gauge in how we will handle abusive sexual relationships in future explorations.
The accusations of racism are strange to me as well. In the first 2 seasons we had Claudia referring to Louis as a slave already. We had Louis being made to act like a valet for Lestat. He had racist violence being depicted in the show. We even had Madeleine having a sexual history with a Nazi? There was always racial weirdness and to be honest, it's era appropriate where selfish people make relationships with flawed people as it benefits them. Geopolitically, socioeconomically, the first 2 seasons were entirely set in Dubai which in the real world is run by exploited slave labour, something Louis is never made to contend with.
Louis as a beneficiary of exploitation was always part of him as a capitalist - where he was a beneficiary of a sugar plantation then a brothel, and later in real estate and fine art, a part of him we see realized in the present day as one of the richest people in the world. In the damn 70s he was picking up queer men and draining them. He's not in it for community and we can see that he never was. This is not to cancel him, but it's an alluring aspect of his character and a central tension with Armand as was elaborated on in the finale. This is part of his failure to understand and care for his own, another central aspect to his distancing himself from his human family. Claudia was always a prop for him to feel redemption from his past failures and sins and he constantly failed her.
As a person of colour, I do understand this is the white boy season, and we see less of our faves who are characters of colour we have grown to love and appreciate. That being said, I think it makes sense with who is telling the story, and I would rather have these characters be treated with the messy nuance of being imperfect and horrible people. It's necessary that POC aren't automatically taken as perfect beings who will always act rationally for themselves and others of their communities and in-groups. Maybe it should have focussed on another character and have been an entirely different project. But we aren't judging the imaginary juggernaut we think this should have been in the safety of our minds.
Like are we mad that our faves weren't fucking enough? Yeah it's fun to watch these people having sex and that's great and all but there's plenty of messy gay drama and I am out here having fun. Hell I even like the corny music and how much of a loser Lestat is, as he is in his own mind.
My only other take is that Delainey is the actress ever and deserves everything. Regina does a lot of the heavy lifting for me in terms of showing that the show at least understands that black women and especially sex workers are like. Human and on the whole deserve a lot better
Ok so my two cents on the vampire show having watched S3 is like
I very much liked it. I read the first book but otherwise I'm show-only.
It's a vast departure in tone and pov because we're getting it from Lestat's pov. Not to mention after 77 years of being pretty much alone and probably on the internet way too much.
Are we forgetting all of s2 where Louis' memories are unraveling and we see where he was also selfish and seeing lestat through rose tinted glasses? Where the whole 2 seasons Claudia was begging to be prioritized, where here stories and feelings were editorialized? Where her memory was used to recraft her tragedy and neglect into something that absolves Louis of his own guilt, when he knew he was dooming her to a volatile existence? As was explained to him at her turning and several times after?
I understand that there may be more of a desire to have seen some relationships developing, and I totally understand the desire to have more screentime with Armand, letting Daniel be more clever, people not getting what's going on with the Great Conversion - these are also threads that were planted in iwtv and if there was more of a focus on the modern day and rumination on the past, centring trauma and abuse it's because these are the things haunting Lestat.
In this continuance we have the framing device of the failures with Daniel on the road with them filming a docu. It's a separate thing, which will highlight different aspects of the characters but I don't see any where these characters were entirely butchered?
I even liked Gabriella and her weird little boy mom/gf angle. I liked that she was unlikeable and I love the concept of her character where she was unable to escape her life and tired of being a mom by like her 8th pregnancy. She is a groomer but her possessiveness is complex. It comes from also Lestat being codependent for too long and wanting to have her around, which neither of them are equipped to deal with what with Gabriella never having been able to choose anything for herself and Lestat not having been able to see himself beyond his belittled existence in his human family. I would have wanted to see her tmasc swag but I also think that as she uses sex to control her son, it's still a compelling enough abuse/codependency angle. The reckoning with the grotesquerie of it was a really powerful scene, and relatable to me as someone coming to terms with control-telated trauma from.my own family which was not sexual, sure, but it's always hard to admit when the people you love have harmed you.
Its also not uncharacteristic for the Chronicles. In iwtv we are also introduced to this sort of thing -grooming and incest. Tuan and Quang Pham are having threesomes with each other. There is a lot of implied child sexual abuse going on. There is even a remark where Louis had a 16 year old lover when he was "older" than that. People speculate on Claudia being Louis' child bride, which in the book is kind of a thing. This was a temperature gauge in how we will handle abusive sexual relationships in future explorations.
The accusations of racism are strange to me as well. In the first 2 seasons we had Claudia referring to Louis as a slave already. We had Louis being made to act like a valet for Lestat. He had racist violence being depicted in the show. We even had Madeleine having a sexual history with a Nazi? There was always racial weirdness and to be honest, it's era appropriate where selfish people make relationships with flawed people as it benefits them. Geopolitically, socioeconomically, the first 2 seasons were entirely set in Dubai which in the real world is run by exploited slave labour, something Louis is never made to contend with.
Louis as a beneficiary of exploitation was always part of him as a capitalist - where he was a beneficiary of a sugar plantation then a brothel, and later in real estate and fine art, a part of him we see realized in the present day as one of the richest people in the world. In the damn 70s he was picking up queer men and draining them. He's not in it for community and we can see that he never was. This is not to cancel him, but it's an alluring aspect of his character and a central tension with Armand as was elaborated on in the finale. This is part of his failure to understand and care for his own, another central aspect to his distancing himself from his human family. Claudia was always a prop for him to feel redemption from his past failures and sins and he constantly failed her.
As a person of colour, I do understand this is the white boy season, and we see less of our faves who are characters of colour we have grown to love and appreciate. That being said, I think it makes sense with who is telling the story, and I would rather have these characters be treated with the messy nuance of being imperfect and horrible people. It's necessary that POC aren't automatically taken as perfect beings who will always act rationally for themselves and others of their communities and in-groups. Maybe it should have focussed on another character and have been an entirely different project. But we aren't judging the imaginary juggernaut we think this should have been in the safety of our minds.
Like are we mad that our faves weren't fucking enough? Yeah it's fun to watch these people having sex and that's great and all but there's plenty of messy gay drama and I am out here having fun. Hell I even like the corny music and how much of a loser Lestat is, as he is in his own mind.
So many women are looking for a “masc lesbian” but what they really mean is that they want a top who has their life together lmao
“You got masc vibes even though you are a femme” do I? Or do you just think that confidence and competence are inherently linked to masculinity?
Like if you want someone to top you till you cry then you should just say that. There are many women who can provide, many of them femme.
But also it’s kind of rude to assign gender roles and sexual preferences to someone just because they’re masc. just because she wears a snapback that doesn’t mean she’s a top or able to fix your car or whatever.
if you spoke to lestat or louis about your pain, they would say, "your pain? what about MY pain?" but if you spoke about your pain to armand he would say "let me lobotomize you and you will never feel pain again." he has a solution-based mindset and we could all learn from him.
how do i get people to care about my art??
trying to get people to care about your art is an ultimately fruitless endeavor, you should focus on drawing what you care about. people will care naturally over time.
but if youre still hung up on that, try drawing something people like. like chicks with great big breasts
We all do realize that the worst thing Armand has done is orchestrating a theatrical murder of a black woman stuck in a child's body (disability allegory) who has been sidelined her entire life just as she found an ounce of happiness. Right? And her lover died too?? Like Lestat is not the biggest victim here I fear
in a videos game the Jungle has a Temple which must be a biome specific natural structure and surely means nothing. most times it's abandonedTemple covered by Jungle Vegetation but sometimes, less so since the 90s but still around, youre gonna meet some human or at least humanoid people depicted in a cartoonishly obsolete culturally syncretic racism that surely cant be really racist, guys, theyre not pointing to a real culture plus the people of color that live around me aren't like that. those are Jungle People that live in Jungle and we all know that there's no real life people that live in Jungle
Genuinely cannot get behind past Daniel/Armand. They're not interesting to me at all. Sorry. It's only after 50 years of stalking and manipulation that he can contend with the totality of Armand in his life that makes it compelling. All the divorces and benders and he's had an audience the entire time. The violation. Truman x Christof. My little puppet who started tugging at his strings. My bug escaping his cage. My hamster gnawing off his legs crying for help. You get me
Since the vampire Lestat (music artist) is montréalais I do want there to be a full song in french that would qualify it for the funny Quebecois playlists I get on quobuz music player
There's an attitude I've been seeing more and more of where having any kind of artistic opinion that isn't praise is seen as some kind of faux pas designed to yuck people's yum or whatever, and while I understand the kneejerk response behind it I do have to wonder like. How sustainable do you think it is to foster an environment where even the most casual criticism is met with hoards of defensive with Whoa Mama Mia Cunt Let People Enjoy Things style comments
OK so yes feedback is necessary specifically in art but I have seen people just be full on mean or unnecessarily harsh. There's creative criticism and then there's just being a dick for the sake of it.
Okay. And I'm saying people are allowed to, when they want to, on their blogs, be a dick about things for the sake of it if they feel like doing it. I'm wildly skeptical of the idea that constructive critique is the only kind of feedback one is "allowed" to make in their own siloed corner of the internet, or that insistence on this will somehow create a healthier space for expressing opinions.
Once again. I can understand the kneejerk impulse here, I do. It sucks to imagine, say, a creator scrolling online coming across some needlessly vitriolic post about something they worked on. But anyone is allowed to go "That's dickish" and move on, or people can engage with "I think this is oversimplified blah blah" if they want to but at the end of the day it isn't some kind of crime against the hobby or a fandom or even a singular person if someone just shoots off "This sucked I wasted my night" in their own accounts.
Like. A lot of people are trending towards thinking I'm talking about the importance of constructive criticism and like, sure, I think that is probably a more interesting avenue of analyzing something's flaws, but once again if you're not like, addressing an artist or interested in doing a deep dive that doesn't mean you're Not Allowed to be flippant or quick to judge. It's kind of startling how many times I've seen someone be like, "I can't stand this album" on their blogs, untagged, had that shit shared, only for it to come across someone's feed and for them to respond with "Why? What's wrong with it? People are allowed to like it, why are you being so negative, why are you tearing people down for no reason, this isn't even real critique," as though the intention in the first place ever was or ought to have been substantive critique in the first place.
It's difficult to articulate my feelings on this, but I do increasingly feel that the insistence upon there being a correct form of disliking something that precludes the possibility of making anyone feel insecure or hurt because they like it is significantly more stultifying than an atmosphere where people can shoot off "Fuck this" and be blocked or ignored for it
Having been through art school with a BA as a result let me just stop you there.
OK sometimes you don't like a certain art style. That's fine. Doesn't mean the art is bad, it's just not to your tastes.
That doesn't give you the right nor even a reason to be a dick on the Internet because you don't like something. If you want to be a dick, do it to someone who has time and energy to give it back. Because at that point you deserve shit in return.
If someone is outright asking for constructive criticism, that still doesn't give you the chance to be a dick. It means they want help learning something they're putting time and effort into.
By all means, be a dick, just do it to people who have earned it.
I feel like you're misunderstanding the entire thrust of this conversation.
Why do I need a "right" or "reason" to post anything online? Why is it that my enjoyment of something is intrinsically justifiable, but my lack of enjoyment requires justification? And based on whose standards? If I can thoughtlessly tweet out a "This album rocks," without expecting people who hate it to demand a longform review from me to explain my enjoyment, I'm not sure I understand why I can't say "This album sucks" without having to go into the trenches about its positive qualities and negative ones. Why do I need to formulate every opinion I have in the form of an art school critique addressing nobody at all?
Why can praise be thoughtless but criticism must, at all costs, be formulated in art school constructive form in case the creator happens to see it and get their feelings hurt or a fan finds it harmful? Particularly when someone could very well have their feelings hurt by thoughtless praise of something as well! I'm not even trying to claim a more substantive form of criticism isn't more interesting or more valuable for one's interpretive abilities. I just think this notion that there is a moral obligation in all online spaces-- no matter how siloed-- to tiptoe around the potential hurt feelings of a hypothetical audience that may or may not even be courted, is at best stultifying for any real plurality of opinion and at worst enabling people whose insecurities about their own hobbies lead them to confidently dictate what people say in whatever passes for privacy in an online space nowadays.
I dunno, I've read works of brutal polemic that I've found immensely creatively engaging, thoughtful, and substantial in its knowledge of a particular form or medium. I've read works of praise I've found miserably trite. Why is the former not allowed to exist because of its dickishness? Why is the latter beyond critique itself?
A lot of people seem to be laboring under the idea that this is describing a situation where someone is literally walking up to someone and going "Your shit sucks" and walking off, but I clearly indicated in that first reblog that that's not even what I'm talking about. I'm not talking about how to talk to people who solicit criticism. I'm not even talking about how to talk to creators at all. I'm talking about this ongoing, deeply insecure assumption held by a number of people in a number of spaces where any kind of negative opinion, regardless of who said it, whether no one was tagged, whether they intended this for a massive audience or for two mutuals, is treated as a personal attack on one's identity rather than a (perhaps douchey!) articulation of one's own tastes. I personally would deeply prefer an environment where people can feel comfortable just saying whatever shit they feel like on their blogs/accounts and just getting blocked if someone's feelings are hurt over it than this constant assumption that there's a morally acceptable formatting one must adhere to for fear of reducing some hypothetical reader to tears, IN CASE they were to, by whatever means, encounter that opinion in the wild
there's a common belief that artists know how to make art. this is untrue. i've yet to meet a single artist who has any idea what they're doing
FORBIDDEN FRUITS dir. Meredith Alloway, 2026
has anyone considered that it was probably her house too. where else was she supposed to put her chintz?
It's funny how much the world would be better off if Armand didn't exist. That guy should have killed himself 500 years ago but also since he's here may as well let him be with Daniel so they can circle each other's toxicities for eternity. Sometimes you gotta wait half a millenium for your soulmate BC the universe has to cook up another person who ruins everything and sucks as much as you do. Anyways I'm obsessed. No notes. They're gonna fall in love and be so disgustingly codependent and selfish
Toxic situationship with my biological mommy I guess