frankie :3 @toesuckler - Tumblr Blog

🐈🧶🐾— we have poor memory, be warned. we encourage anon hate, and general messages

🐈🧶🐾— we are a system, please keep this in mind while talking to or about us and feel free to ask who is fronting. frankie works for all, as frankie isnt one individual person.

🐈🧶🐾—dni if you hate our comically large spoon or seek to limit our icecream intake.

for more information see this post

#ollie rambles #the dogs r me btw

oh thats the word! the pet peeve ive been looking to name is called mixels :-)

#it bothers me a lot especially in sprite art redesigns or fan sprites of things

norahsdove

Hello my name is Dr hotdog. And I'm a woman.

cigarette in hand with a look of utter disgrace.

#what a nonsensical trigger to literally anyone else.#maybe even people who did that wouldnt get it #ugh and now im all messed up in the head over it. jeez.

ganymedeshouse

Grasslands

bungerc0re

i trade money for goods and an amazing digital service

brarchives

palomabarbiezinha

catchymemes

cltoral-hypoplasia

I made a little zine based on my experiences growing up with and figuring out I had clitoral hypoplasia, and the relief I felt when I realized I’m not alone.

This is my first time making a zine, but I spent a ton of time on this and I hope it helps someone else feel a little less alone!

trixthemagemain

The ECHR's updated Code of Practice is going to cause irreparable harm to trans and gender non-conforming people in the UK.

What the Code actually does

The Code is the EHRC’s interpretation of the April 2025 Supreme Court ruling in For Women Scotland v The Scottish Ministers. That ruling redefined “sex” in the Equality Act 2010 to mean biological sex. The EHRC was always going to update the Code. The question was how. The answer arrived on 21 May, and the answer is: badly. The Code defines “woman” as “biological woman.” It defines “man” as “biological man.” For the purposes of the Equality Act, sex means sex at birth. End of. That definition then cascades. Single-sex spaces, the Code says, must be operated on the basis of biological sex. Trans people “should be offered” a third or gender-neutral space. Trans women can be excluded from women-only associations. Trans people are excluded from single-sex competitions for the gender they live in. If a women-only service chooses to admit trans women, it may legally cease to qualify as a single-sex service at all. That last bit goes unsaid in most of the coverage. Read it again. A women’s group that has been trans-inclusive for twenty years, run by women who voted democratically to be trans-inclusive, can now lose its legal protection as a single-sex service because of who its members chose to include. A small group of self-styled women’s rights campaigners can threaten a much larger women’s organisation with court action for being too welcoming. That is the policy. It is being sold as protection. It is, in practice, a way of bullying women out of running the kinds of services women have chosen to run. The Code does not stop at toilets and refuges. It limits access to healthcare. To housing. To social care. To gyms, pools, spas. And then, quietly, it rewrites what “lesbian” and “gay” mean in law. Paragraph 2.50 of the Code says, in plain text: “a trans man with a GRC is a woman and a trans woman with a GRC is a man, for the purposes of the Act.” Paragraph 2.92 then defines sexual orientation: “a person’s sexual orientation towards persons of the same sex (the person is a lesbian woman or a gay man).” And paragraph 2.96 closes the back door: “Gender reassignment is a separate protected characteristic and unrelated to sexual orientation.” Stitch those three together and the consequence is unavoidable. A trans woman in a relationship with a cis woman is legally, under this Code, a man in a relationship with a woman. Heterosexual. Not a lesbian couple. Not protected as one. I had to read that twice. It is in the document the government has just laid before Parliament. You can read it yourself on gov.uk.

Taken from: https://biminibabes.substack.com/p/write-the-letter-babes

I don't tend to write posts like this, but this is something that is going to harm me and so many others in the UK.

Please share this link around if you're not from the UK, and if you are - click on it. It'll give you the link to a petition and it will help you send a letter to your MP asking them to vote against this.

EDM 240 / prayer motion is live. Your MP needs to sign it. Two taps via the coalition tool.

tags: @satan-offical @negativelegend @lostinthewrongfandom @villain-offical @skylar-helsing @unyieldingsilence @no-one-offical @explosions-are-funny @what-even-is-thiss @pukicho @ghostofafruitmain @thatdamhobbit @ihavemanythoughts @thisisexorsexism @thisistransphobia @hi-just-existing @sometimes--i--exist @failed-verification @a-lua-da @yourlocalfandomfriendo @zeenahasarrived @thisisallcameronsfault @em-duckie @ilov3b00kss0much @the-manifesto-of-lily

sport-news-daily

rubber ball leather ball cloth ball wooden ball stone ball glass ball light ball diamond ball missing ball super ball secret ball

pseudomantis

Twin boys

monsterpotion

wire son and cloth son

molabuddy

i love when a character is very clearly going through their own shit badly and is able to be sympathised with yet they are also being awful to others and hurting people who don't deserve it, and the narrative is showing how they got here but not letting them off the hook for being cruel just because they are hurting.

i dont like ☝ what happens when you introduce this type of character to a large fandom

molabuddy

especially if she is a woman